lawdog1
Supporter
- Sep 14, 2000
- 60,194
- 72,716
Cinco De Mayo may have been yesterday, but thread remains muy picante.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What are you basing your opinion on?
So you don't think he is strong in the Technical department.See you specified in regards to his coaching. I live in the bay/didn't have league pass back then so I watched the Warriors basically anytime they didn't have a better game broadcasting during theirs.
He just seemed to be running his offense like it was the 90s, the Klay post ups, the obsession with using his declining big man in David Lee (he was good statistically but teams were abusing the living hell out of him on defense and Jackson seemed to force the issue with his touches). I was just confused a lot of the time when I'd watch them play, he didn't seem like much of a game planner/adjuster either.
So you don't think he is strong in the Technical department.
Would you agree that is only one part of coaching?
Would you also agree that only seeing a coach during a game isn't enough of a sample size to judge whether or not he/she is a good coach?
I don't want this conversation to get personal but I just find it wild that we speak on who is/isn't a good coach when we probably see 5% of what ALL they do for their teams. (And judge the majority of it on wins/losses).
I am not here to defend Mark Jackson. From reports, there was a LOT of "other" stuff going on.While it's only one part I think it's a bigger part than 5%.
Add to that he was clashing with front office members his first year there (first head coaching gig) and making demands for his staff, and rubbing holy water on Steph's bad ankle at a service and making him jump around on it at one of his services to show that he was healed from it, and forcing his religion on the entire team; doesn't seem like a good mix to me. I know players defended him when he got fired so yeah Im on the outside looking in, but everything that was reported/what I saw on the court just seemed like a bad combination to me and there's a reason he hasn't got an offer since.
I am not here to defend Mark Jackson. From reports, there was a LOT of "other" stuff going on.
I am simply saying, you sitting in the stands and seeing what his team is running isn't enough to determine whether or not he is a good coach. That is just my opinion.
I am not trying to fight about if he still deserves his job. I know holding onto a job is as much about politics as it is about ability.
Pot calls kettle black. You used a small snippet of Mark Jackson life to call him a fraud as well to say it's the reason why he is a bad coach and to justify why he is being blackballed.. You also volunteered that information about you getting cheated on in every relationship you've been. Regardless, for a man to be constantly getting cheated on and sounding like a victim, it means he is either trying to get with women that he cannot handle or he is a charming sawft beta ***.That's what we're on this beautiful Wednesday morning? Narrow minded psychoanalysis through tiny snippets of the life of a stranger on the Internet?
Bet...
No, I am not diminishing any of those things at all. In THAT league, you have to play the game. I understand that, hell that is true for any level of basketball.I'm just saying I think those things play into being a coach too. You're supposed to be a leader of young men in that position and when you go around stirring **** up in the workplace it doesn't help.
And I think we just agree to disagree on how much on court execution matters then. You're not putting your team in the best position to win, you're not using your players to their strengths; that's bad coaching to me.
No, I am not diminishing any of those things at all. In THAT league, you have to play the game. I understand that, hell that is true for any level of basketball.
I think on court execution is HUGE. When I gave the 5%, I was more so speaking on TIME you see an NBA coach BEING a coach.
I wasn't saying on court execution is a small % in terms of IMPORTANCE. I was speaking of time visible by outsiders.
1. Call him a fraud.You used a small snippet of Mark Jackson life to call him a fraud as well to say it's the reason why he is a bad coach and to justify why he is being blackballed..
come to y’all in moment of vulnerability and I get jokes
The privilege and false sense of entitlement you're displaying here is very interesting.You also volunteered that information about you getting cheated on in every relationship you've been. Regardless, for a man to be constantly getting cheated on and sounding like a victim, it means he is either trying to get with women that he cannot handle or he is a charming sawft beta ***.
^^^ I honestly didn’t know that Chuck and MJ had a falling out. I’ll take my very late pass on that one.