Under Armour = flabby & sick VOL. NY times

there's really nothing there IMO.
Don't underestimate Converse cause they have plenty of gems Run N Slam, Back Jam, Tarmax, Aerojet, Pro Conquest, just to name a few.
84833661_2688328004614123_8204615826125257518_n.jpg

62584315_157158152111306_948821154903759664_n.jpg

49283520_723665701351139_6702541788357101596_n.jpg
 
there's really nothing there IMO.

Nike IMO would've had Reebok's cylinders clickin' like JB.

think about it like this.... let's pretend Reebok instead of being a company, was a Signature line...da amount of money Reebok could've generated in strategically released retros & better managed, they'ed knock it outta da park.

There's nothing there? Converse ran the sneaker game in the 80s. All the top Stars wore Converse and they have tons of memorable shoes.

converse-weapon-boys-life-may-1986-20140506-1.png
 
Converse weapons were retroed to death during da jersey era.

and if we're being honest Reebok & Adidas ran 80s with aerobic craze workout sneakers & shelltoes. this is why Nike signed Michael Jordan because they needed something to combat against Adidas and Reebok.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom