- 26,820
- 39,783
- Joined
- Jan 30, 2007
She looks like she might be packing down there
WELCOME TO THE MARVEL MULTIVERSE -*RIP STAN LEE & Boseman* - D&W OUT NOW - Doomsday = RDJ back
She looks like she might be packing down there
- 21,442
- 18,444
- Joined
- Feb 14, 2007
What's the comic story of Mjolnir being reforged?
- 1,599
- 1,175
- Joined
- Aug 8, 2003
I didn’t know skinny Adele was Mighty Thor.
- 22,378
- 16,188
- Joined
- Jul 16, 2017
At the very least, clitoromegaly
- 2,150
- 2,603
- Joined
- Aug 15, 2017
New thor uni looks pretty cool w/ the blue highlights.
- 7,517
- 10,200
- Joined
- Sep 21, 2012
She gave a truly inspiring performance as Taffy.
- 90,126
- 122,338
- Joined
- Sep 5, 2010
- 74,264
- 61,614
- Joined
- Dec 13, 2004
are we suppose to know who those 2 are?
- 28,352
- 53,554
- Joined
- Apr 2, 2007
I had to look them up 
- 1,920
- 5,841
- Joined
- Oct 12, 2018
War of the realms 6
- 87,816
- 50,276
- Joined
- Nov 20, 2007
It's not
- 31,879
- 34,476
- Joined
- Jun 24, 2013
That’s not Denzel so no lol
- 15,088
- 4,324
- Joined
- Sep 1, 2008
I like how Marvel hasn’t really been hiding Nathalie as Thor.
As much as I like surprises, this has me hype.
As much as I like surprises, this has me hype.
- 87,816
- 50,276
- Joined
- Nov 20, 2007
There's two Arno Stark's. The recent one is the biological Stark heir.
The other one is Tony's nephew and is Iron Man 2020.
- 53,391
- 20,975
- Joined
- Nov 24, 2009
thor lost his endgame fat. Would've been cool if portman worked out to get linda hamilton / sarah connor arms.
- 87,816
- 50,276
- Joined
- Nov 20, 2007
Which time are we talking about? Its happened more than once.Only thing that tops it is Thor being unworthy to lift it.
Last edited:
- 10,911
- 9,203
- Joined
- Apr 27, 2014
Tired of seeing **** like this on my feed
- 21,442
- 18,444
- Joined
- Feb 14, 2007
You know her as Thor’s gonna be the main selling point for the masses when the marketing machine gets going, so they might as we’ll own it.
What’s crazy is that we’re Bale as Gorr the God Butcher in this thing.
- 8,364
- 6,124
- Joined
- Oct 19, 2004
Speaking of Spiderman,
www.ign.com
I actually never thought about the "physical evidence" piece in regards to the ending of this movie.
That's definitely something to think about
PO
Spider Man: No Way Home Writers ‘Have Answers’ for Plot Hole, But Can’t Divulge Them Yet - IGN
Spider-Man: No Way Home's ending leaves a seemingly major plot hole – one that the writers say they have answers for, but tell us they aren't allowed to divulge right now.
I actually never thought about the "physical evidence" piece in regards to the ending of this movie.
That's definitely something to think about
PO
- 22,378
- 16,188
- Joined
- Jul 16, 2017
I don’t understand.Speaking of Spiderman,
Spider Man: No Way Home Writers ‘Have Answers’ for Plot Hole, But Can’t Divulge Them Yet - IGN
Spider-Man: No Way Home's ending leaves a seemingly major plot hole – one that the writers say they have answers for, but tell us they aren't allowed to divulge right now.
I actually never thought about the "physical evidence" piece in regards to the ending of this movie.
That's definitely something to think about
PO
- 8,364
- 6,124
- Joined
- Oct 19, 2004
I'm going to spoiler it, just in-case there are some people who frequent this thread but somehow have not seen it.
When Strange cast the spell to make everyone forget "Peter Parker" at the end, they never explore what happens to the physical evidence. Meaning let's say Ned has a picture with him & Peter at his house. Did all that type of stuff vanish? Or is it still there?
The writers avoided answering that which you can read in the article, so for me it just makes me think, as that was not something I even thought about & at the same time I love the approach they took because the emphasis on Peter's emotions in those last 10 minutes or so was more important than them explaining the physical objects that serve as evidence that Peter Parker is Spider-Man or the memories he created with anyone.
Hope that clears up your confusion.
The writers avoided answering that which you can read in the article, so for me it just makes me think, as that was not something I even thought about & at the same time I love the approach they took because the emphasis on Peter's emotions in those last 10 minutes or so was more important than them explaining the physical objects that serve as evidence that Peter Parker is Spider-Man or the memories he created with anyone.
Hope that clears up your confusion.
PO
- 3,856
- 9,284
- Joined
- Feb 10, 2014
Sony spodermane fan boys already gaslighting themselves. Mfers minds livin on a variant timeline
- 22,683
- 25,062
- Joined
- Feb 23, 2010
Actually yeah me and my boys were thinking if it meant “forget” like memory or if he never existed, so like a passport or drivers license would dust like a thanos snap
- 22,378
- 16,188
- Joined
- Jul 16, 2017
Thanks. That makes tons of sense and something I didn’t think of
- 38,699
- 76,887
- Joined
- Apr 5, 2008
