|A-Man|
formerly atgd7154xbbxmz
- 17,340
- 2,011
I can't wait to see what I wake up too
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
"Who's going to pull the button on it?" Jackson said. "http://www.bing.com/search?form=CXTSPR&q=When Chris&mkt=en-CA&adlt=strictWhen Chris says he has to be traded, how's that going to go? ... Someone's going to have to make a very non-judgmental decision on that part that's not going to irritate anyone else in the league."
--Phil Jackson on the New Orleans Hornets being owned by the NBA, December 29, 2010.
so Eillison cant buy Hornets so he can move them to San Jose when Stern let Clay Bennett buy the Sonics and move them out of SeattleOriginally Posted by Executive76
Originally Posted by aepps20
Originally Posted by Mamba MVP
I would just like a real explanation cause every thing their spewing out makes no sense, if it was to the Bobcats they wouldn't have done it *+++$. "Basketball reasons" what the hell does that mean.
NBA wants to sucker some rich people into buying that franchise and they're content to use CP3 as bait. IMO if CP3 played for a team that wasn't owned by the NBA (NBA trying to sell team too) this wouldn't be an issue.
Stern already turned down Ellison's 450 million bid because he wanted to move the team to San Jose. I don't see anyone buying the team and not relocating it so the League is gonna own it for a while.
I am FINISHED!!!Originally Posted by MrONegative
Originally Posted by CasperJr
Originally Posted by kash55
somebody find that gone to soon thread
Originally Posted by MrONegative
"Who's going to pull the button on it?" Jackson said. "http://www.bing.com/search?form=CXTSPR&q=When Chris&mkt=en-CA&adlt=strictWhen Chris says he has to be traded, how's that going to go? ... Someone's going to have to make a very non-judgmental decision on that part that's not going to irritate anyone else in the league."
This. The league may technically own the Hornets but other teams/owners are not within their rights to block a trade that the three teams and their management agreed to with no grounds to do so. They may not like CP3 demanding a trade, but it's the Hornets' decision whether they want to accommodate that or not, and they chose to and got what looked like a pretty good deal. You can't just block a trade because other teams don't want it to happen; it's not like he got traded for a stick of gum. Maybe I'm overreacting but I'm absolutely incredulous that Stern did this and I think he should be ousted immediately. [Kanye]No one man should have all that power.[/Kanye]Originally Posted by aepps20
This smells like collusion to me.
Originally Posted by MrONegative
"Who's going to pull the button on it?" Jackson said. "http://www.bing.com/search?form=CXTSPR&q=When Chris&mkt=en-CA&adlt=strictWhen Chris says he has to be traded, how's that going to go? ... Someone's going to have to make a very non-judgmental decision on that part that's not going to irritate anyone else in the league."
@WojYahooNBA Adrian Wojnarowski
To listen to the GM's, coaches, players, agents reaching out to me tonight: I think the NBA has changed forever with Stern's act tonight.
[h1]Lamar Odom in 'disbelief' after nearly being traded to Hornets[/h1]
Lamar Odom is still a Laker, but he doesn't sound completely thrilled about it.
Odom admitted that he was âshockedâ
Originally Posted by dakid23
at the NBA.
sheridanhoops Chris Sheridan
I'm told there is a school of thought in informed circles that Stern vetoed C.Paul trade because a D.Howard-to-LA trade was coming up next.
Originally Posted by Elpablo21
sheridanhoops Chris Sheridan
I'm told there is a school of thought in informed circles that Stern vetoed C.Paul trade because a D.Howard-to-LA trade was coming up next.
Originally Posted by GotHolesInMySocks
everyone knows stern is a knick fan....he wants paul here in NY
he gave y'all ewing....time for a new gift.
btw, dont know if posted but i heard on the radio that phil jackson will coach again in 2012.
Originally Posted by westcoastsfinest
Originally Posted by Elpablo21
sheridanhoops Chris Sheridan
I'm told there is a school of thought in informed circles that Stern vetoed C.Paul trade because a D.Howard-to-LA trade was coming up next.