- 10,948
- 13,085
nevermind
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Really? I actually think that's a good trade for Orlando. Brooke is the NEXT up and coming center and still has plenty of potential to be very good. This deal sounds way better than Bynum's injury prone self to me.Originally Posted by Mr Jordan04
Originally Posted by Tom Hanson
if nets get howard for lopez that right there is robbery....
the magic will be horrible to watch....
I still dont get how that "trade" is even considered. I hope Salty Dan writes a letter about that
Originally Posted by dland24
A lot of you guys are clowning on Dan Gilbert, but dude has a point if what he is saying is accurate. Acquiring the best player in the deal and saving over $40 million dollars at the expense of a team owned by the league? I guess I am in the minority here when I say that I dont blame the owners getting pissed enough to get this trade vetoed.
Exactly. **@! makes 0 sense.Originally Posted by JUS3
"Chris Paul is leaving New Orleans in 66 games. Heâs gone. And whatâs Dell Demps, and that franchise, going to have to show for it"
Originally Posted by OneTrust
Really? I actually think that's a good trade for Orlando. Brooke is the NEXT up and coming centerOriginally Posted by Mr Jordan04
Originally Posted by Tom Hanson
if nets get howard for lopez that right there is robbery....
the magic will be horrible to watch....
I still dont get how that "trade" is even considered. I hope Salty Dan writes a letter about that
So you'd rather have an injury-prone andrew bynum? Okay, if you say so.Originally Posted by Tom Hanson
Originally Posted by OneTrust
Really? I actually think that's a good trade for Orlando. Brooke is the NEXT up and coming centerOriginally Posted by Mr Jordan04
I still dont get how that "trade" is even considered. I hope Salty Dan writes a letter about that
Yes. Brooke Lopez averages 6 rebounds a game. 7 footer playing 35+ minutes... Bynum gets 10 rebs playing 28mpg, and playing next to Odom and Gasol.Originally Posted by OneTrust
So you'd rather have an injury-prone andrew bynum? Okay, if you say so.Originally Posted by Tom Hanson
Originally Posted by OneTrust
Really? I actually think that's a good trade for Orlando. Brooke is the NEXT up and coming center
Originally Posted by dland24
A lot of you guys are clowning on Dan Gilbert, but dude has a point if what he is saying is accurate. Acquiring the best player in the deal and saving over $40 million dollars at the expense of a team owned by the league? I guess I am in the minority here when I say that I dont blame the owners getting pissed enough to get this trade vetoed.
But at the same time, the Hornets made a pretty good trade. I dont know. I guess I am going back and forth on this trade.
Not griping at all. Just stating why they vetoed it.Originally Posted by denni5themenace
ya'll really griping about FORTY MILLION DOLLARS? really? after the owners already ROBBED the players for a part of their BRI? REALLY?
Originally Posted by dland24
Acquiring the best player in the deal and saving over $40 million dollars at the expense of a team owned by the league?
He's not a great rebounder yes, but I'd rather have a center I KNOW will actually play more than 30 games a season for me especially if I'm trading away my franchise center.Originally Posted by imINchucks5
Yes. Brooke Lopez averages 6 rebounds a game. 7 footer playing 35+ minutes... Bynum gets 10 rebs playing 28mpg, and playing next to Odom and Gasol.Originally Posted by OneTrust
So you'd rather have an injury-prone andrew bynum? Okay, if you say so.Originally Posted by Tom Hanson
Please, If bynum was a first option like Brooke, hed get 20ppg also.
Originally Posted by ill steelo
Originally Posted by dland24
A lot of you guys are clowning on Dan Gilbert, but dude has a point if what he is saying is accurate. Acquiring the best player in the deal and saving over $40 million dollars at the expense of a team owned by the league? I guess I am in the minority here when I say that I dont blame the owners getting pissed enough to get this trade vetoed.
Exactly. Deal goes through if the Hornets weren't owned by the league.
Originally Posted by Dade B0Y
it was handled poorly from the jump. Dell Demps should have NEVER had full clearance to make deals. Everything should have had to go to a vote of some capacity.
wasn't pointing it at you. was referring to dan gilbert and other owners.Originally Posted by ill steelo
Not griping at all. Just stating why they vetoed it.Originally Posted by denni5themenace
ya'll really griping about FORTY MILLION DOLLARS? really? after the owners already ROBBED the players for a part of their BRI? REALLY?
BTW, that BRI split was necessary to keep league up and running. The league was losing 250+ mil per season
Originally Posted by dland24
A lot of you guys are clowning on Dan Gilbert, but dude has a point if what he is saying is accurate. Acquiring the best player in the deal and saving over $40 million dollars at the expense of a team owned by the league? I guess I am in the minority here when I say that I dont blame the owners getting pissed enough to get this trade vetoed.
you god damn skippy. there isn't a team i hate more than the lakers. to see them get screwed brings me pure joy.Originally Posted by irie
first the cp3 trade vetoed and now dwight looking at new jersey ..... damn, the heat must be loving this
I'd agree with this if it wasn't for the fact that the voters would be people who not only don't really care about the best interest of the Hornets but are actually competing with them (and the other teams that would be involved in any matters to be voted on).Originally Posted by Dade B0Y
Everything should have had to go to a vote of some capacity.
Originally Posted by TheyHateMe
Now do you all see why Lebron left the way he did...That man Dan Gilbert is SCUM!
Originally Posted by StroShow4
Originally Posted by dland24
Acquiring the best player in the deal and saving over $40 million dollars at the expense of a team owned by the league?
This is true, but the Hornets, overall, got the most talent, and probably the best package available for their player on the block. Also, is it really fair for the owners to impose some sort of budget on a team they temporarily own but also compete with? That's not a rhetorical question, I am asking peoples' opinion.
This move was a good one for the Hornets, and their competitors got it vetoed. Yes, they added some salary, but it was still a good move that was nixed by competing teams... eeeeh seems sketchy to me. Not to mention the fact that the Lakers were involved was probably equally as big a reason why the owners were pissed as the financial stuff.
https://twitter.com/#!/TheRealTWill
https://twitter.com/#!/TheRealTWillTheRealTWill Terrence Williams
It's krazy@CP3 is not waking up a laker and it's dumb I'm not able to run that pick and roll with gasol smh sad disappointing day 4 NBA
jrich23 Jason Richardson
Once again Buck Nasty a.k.a Dan Gilbert is letting his wrath being felt by being the main voice in the CP trade block.