- 58,181
- 29,618
- Joined
- Feb 12, 2005
BYU can be so damn stagnant on offense.
2011 College Football "The Real been hacked!!!!" .
- Thread in 'Sports & Training' Thread starter Started by Chester McFloppy,
- Start date
- 58,181
- 29,618
- Joined
- Feb 12, 2005
BYU can be so damn stagnant on offense.
- 31,964
- 1,056
- Joined
- Jul 23, 2007
That's what happens when u have no speed or threats to take it the distance.
- 31,964
- 1,056
- Joined
- Jul 23, 2007
That's what happens when u have no speed or threats to take it the distance.
- 58,181
- 29,618
- Joined
- Feb 12, 2005
Well, there goes the offensive gameplan. "Just run Denard."
- 58,181
- 29,618
- Joined
- Feb 12, 2005
Well, there goes the offensive gameplan. "Just run Denard."
- 6,724
- 1,175
- Joined
- Sep 19, 2007
Herbie talking about receivers taking heat off Denard, sure that sounds good an all, but how the hell is a receiver going to take pressure off him if he can't get them the ball.
- 6,724
- 1,175
- Joined
- Sep 19, 2007
Herbie talking about receivers taking heat off Denard, sure that sounds good an all, but how the hell is a receiver going to take pressure off him if he can't get them the ball.
- 7,349
- 243
- Joined
- Sep 24, 2002
That was ugly as hell but it's a win so I'll take it. LT didn't have a great game, but that was just about the most disgraceful performance I've ever seen from our WR's. 4-5 drops at the very least, one was a touchdown and the rest would have been long gains or first downs. 8-20 is a pretty @!%!#! completion % but if the WR's played like some normal human beings it woulda been 13-20 which ain't that bad.
The defense played their %%$ off today. Holding ECU to 112 yds of offense is no joke; so I was encouraged by that. However, I was extremely disappointed in the offense and the offensive line today. ECU's D was markedly improved compared to last year but given our OL's experience and ability I thought they would have played a lot better than that. Not sure if they had a down game or if they just aren't that good.
Was glad to see them use LT on the QB decide early and often. Not too many teams will be able to stop that.
Overall even though we won I feel a lot worse about the season after that game than I did before it.
The defense played their %%$ off today. Holding ECU to 112 yds of offense is no joke; so I was encouraged by that. However, I was extremely disappointed in the offense and the offensive line today. ECU's D was markedly improved compared to last year but given our OL's experience and ability I thought they would have played a lot better than that. Not sure if they had a down game or if they just aren't that good.
Was glad to see them use LT on the QB decide early and often. Not too many teams will be able to stop that.
Overall even though we won I feel a lot worse about the season after that game than I did before it.
- 7,349
- 243
- Joined
- Sep 24, 2002
That was ugly as hell but it's a win so I'll take it. LT didn't have a great game, but that was just about the most disgraceful performance I've ever seen from our WR's. 4-5 drops at the very least, one was a touchdown and the rest would have been long gains or first downs. 8-20 is a pretty @!%!#! completion % but if the WR's played like some normal human beings it woulda been 13-20 which ain't that bad.
The defense played their %%$ off today. Holding ECU to 112 yds of offense is no joke; so I was encouraged by that. However, I was extremely disappointed in the offense and the offensive line today. ECU's D was markedly improved compared to last year but given our OL's experience and ability I thought they would have played a lot better than that. Not sure if they had a down game or if they just aren't that good.
Was glad to see them use LT on the QB decide early and often. Not too many teams will be able to stop that.
Overall even though we won I feel a lot worse about the season after that game than I did before it.
The defense played their %%$ off today. Holding ECU to 112 yds of offense is no joke; so I was encouraged by that. However, I was extremely disappointed in the offense and the offensive line today. ECU's D was markedly improved compared to last year but given our OL's experience and ability I thought they would have played a lot better than that. Not sure if they had a down game or if they just aren't that good.
Was glad to see them use LT on the QB decide early and often. Not too many teams will be able to stop that.
Overall even though we won I feel a lot worse about the season after that game than I did before it.
- 43,574
- 8,494
- Joined
- Apr 24, 2005
It's gonna be bombs away on that secondary
- 43,574
- 8,494
- Joined
- Apr 24, 2005
It's gonna be bombs away on that secondary
- 60,714
- 131,214
- Joined
- Sep 18, 2003
my main man ameer abdullah hit the kicker w/ that wiggle
- 60,714
- 131,214
- Joined
- Sep 18, 2003
my main man ameer abdullah hit the kicker w/ that wiggle
- 31,964
- 1,056
- Joined
- Jul 23, 2007
\o/
- 31,964
- 1,056
- Joined
- Jul 23, 2007
\o/
- 9,511
- 524
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2006
These %$%%#% trojans booooy I swear
- 4,201
- 10
- Joined
- Mar 2, 2011
ND and these TO man smh
Michigan offense is terrible smh
Michigan offense is terrible smh
- 4,201
- 10
- Joined
- Mar 2, 2011
ND and these TO man smh
Michigan offense is terrible smh
Michigan offense is terrible smh
- 9,511
- 524
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2006
These %$%%#% trojans booooy I swear
- 1,951
- 30
- Joined
- May 2, 2004
Somebody tell Borges denard doesnt know how to make any reads on the defense other than the DE.
- 1,951
- 30
- Joined
- May 2, 2004
Somebody tell Borges denard doesnt know how to make any reads on the defense other than the DE.
- 58,181
- 29,618
- Joined
- Feb 12, 2005
- 58,181
- 29,618
- Joined
- Feb 12, 2005
- 23,128
- 5,111
- Joined
- Jan 19, 2002
Where the *$!# is the Michigan offense?
Similar threads
