- 1,880
- 11
Despite the discrepancies from the earlier versions, they still look gorgeous
2011 "OG colorway Jordan 1's"??(notable)
- Thread in 'Jordan Brand' Thread starter Started by sneakerinterior,
- Start date
- 1,880
- 11
Despite the discrepancies from the earlier versions, they still look gorgeous
- 1,110
- 12
copped
- 1,110
- 12
copped
- 1,786
- 2,927
I PRAYED YEARS FOR THESE TO DROP..ALL TIME FAV AJI...AT LEAST 3 FOR ME
- 1,786
- 2,927
I PRAYED YEARS FOR THESE TO DROP..ALL TIME FAV AJI...AT LEAST 3 FOR ME
- 1,859
- 14
Originally Posted by derry1
I PRAYED YEARS FOR THESE TO DROP..ALL TIME FAV AJI...AT LEAST 3 FOR ME
almost granted....2011 would be a banner year once again
- 1,859
- 14
Originally Posted by derry1
I PRAYED YEARS FOR THESE TO DROP..ALL TIME FAV AJI...AT LEAST 3 FOR ME
almost granted....2011 would be a banner year once again
- 977
- 10
co-sign dude.Originally Posted by FrenchBlue23
Those need black laces. White laces on those make the shoe boring.
- 977
- 10
co-sign dude.Originally Posted by FrenchBlue23
Those need black laces. White laces on those make the shoe boring.
- 6
- 10
^That...
Everything else that is wrong with the shoe:
-Giant jumpman air tag on tongue like all the other recent 1's
-Red liner on the tounge.
-Air Jordan Wings are too low and faded.
All these= fail on a historic shoe.
Call me bitter but they don't make 'em like they used to.
Everything else that is wrong with the shoe:
-Giant jumpman air tag on tongue like all the other recent 1's
-Red liner on the tounge.
-Air Jordan Wings are too low and faded.
All these= fail on a historic shoe.
Call me bitter but they don't make 'em like they used to.
- 6
- 10
^That...
Everything else that is wrong with the shoe:
-Giant jumpman air tag on tongue like all the other recent 1's
-Red liner on the tounge.
-Air Jordan Wings are too low and faded.
All these= fail on a historic shoe.
Call me bitter but they don't make 'em like they used to.
Everything else that is wrong with the shoe:
-Giant jumpman air tag on tongue like all the other recent 1's
-Red liner on the tounge.
-Air Jordan Wings are too low and faded.
All these= fail on a historic shoe.
Call me bitter but they don't make 'em like they used to.
sochiyouthoughtiwasbashful
Banned
- 91
- 10
^ THISSOMEONE PLEASE REPOST THE PICTURE THAT WAS ON HERE LAST NIGHT.......
sochiyouthoughtiwasbashful
Banned
- 91
- 10
^ THISSOMEONE PLEASE REPOST THE PICTURE THAT WAS ON HERE LAST NIGHT.......
- 4,288
- 16
So are these confirmed to come out or what? Please don't get me hyped for no reason...
- 4,288
- 16
So are these confirmed to come out or what? Please don't get me hyped for no reason...
- 48,642
- 28,905
Like I said on pg 2, I'd get them by themselves.
Has an elongated toe box like other recent retro (i.e. 4's)
Can tell by the spacing of the holes on top, being farther from
the start of lace holes - so there is a little bit of that "banana effect."
Can be observed on bigger sizes (of old retros vs the pic above) so it's
not a size thing.
Though I expect this kind of stuff. Assume there would be jumpman on the
heel too - but pic angle conveniently obstructs.
Need a new release of these and the wht/blk 4's, however inferior, to stretch
out the potential timeframe I can wear that model, ya know.
Has an elongated toe box like other recent retro (i.e. 4's)
Can tell by the spacing of the holes on top, being farther from
the start of lace holes - so there is a little bit of that "banana effect."
Can be observed on bigger sizes (of old retros vs the pic above) so it's
not a size thing.
Though I expect this kind of stuff. Assume there would be jumpman on the
heel too - but pic angle conveniently obstructs.
Need a new release of these and the wht/blk 4's, however inferior, to stretch
out the potential timeframe I can wear that model, ya know.
- 48,642
- 28,905
Like I said on pg 2, I'd get them by themselves.
Has an elongated toe box like other recent retro (i.e. 4's)
Can tell by the spacing of the holes on top, being farther from
the start of lace holes - so there is a little bit of that "banana effect."
Can be observed on bigger sizes (of old retros vs the pic above) so it's
not a size thing.
Though I expect this kind of stuff. Assume there would be jumpman on the
heel too - but pic angle conveniently obstructs.
Need a new release of these and the wht/blk 4's, however inferior, to stretch
out the potential timeframe I can wear that model, ya know.
Has an elongated toe box like other recent retro (i.e. 4's)
Can tell by the spacing of the holes on top, being farther from
the start of lace holes - so there is a little bit of that "banana effect."
Can be observed on bigger sizes (of old retros vs the pic above) so it's
not a size thing.
Though I expect this kind of stuff. Assume there would be jumpman on the
heel too - but pic angle conveniently obstructs.
Need a new release of these and the wht/blk 4's, however inferior, to stretch
out the potential timeframe I can wear that model, ya know.
- 1,015
- 49
These make me want a pair of 94's so badly. Tongue looks off with the jumpman instead of the Nike Air.
- 1,015
- 49
These make me want a pair of 94's so badly. Tongue looks off with the jumpman instead of the Nike Air.
- 13,330
- 11,573
They look good to me. I would cop.
- 13,330
- 11,573
They look good to me. I would cop.
- 429
- 10
what's the difference of this compared to the AJKO's?
- 429
- 10
what's the difference of this compared to the AJKO's?
- 15,762
- 517
Is this a serious question?
