- 690
- 61
- Joined
- Sep 4, 2012
So April 13th? Confirmed?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Thanks brother.OG samples were patent leather...Pics posted in here of non patent leather color-up's are fakes...
^^^Same as above...OG's were patent...
QS so expect same numbers as Royal's...Only diff is that JB is actually letting us know ahead of time with these...
I would go for the celtics over these personally, but I think I'm going to pass on both.Only AJ1 Release in April worth considering
This. I think a big reason those 1994 retros sat is because MJ was in his prime and people wanted the shoes that he had on his feet at the moment.I don't agree with a lot of this.
I wouldn't say there were no sneakerheads. Being a sneakerhead is a fad now and that title didn't exist then. How you defined it is different. Back then you didn't need to buy every release to be a sneakerhead.
Many people had more than 2 or 3 pairs of sneakers.
Retros weren't cool back then and neither was wearing last years Jordan's. All of that is acceptable now. I remember when Jordan's first started retroing and I thought it was weird. That's how I got my 1994 III's.
It's not like anyone can see the glitter on the sole when your wearing them anyway. I don't get what the big deal is?Would be a hands down cop if it wasn't for that God damn glitter sole ********.
Nope i do too, i think people don't like it just because they want the original colour sole.Am I the only one that likes the white mid sole and the gum bottom minus the glittery stuff...