MVP
Supporter
- 83,004
- 85,572
There was NO market for Nick Young. I can't remember a single rumor about "Team X" is looking to sign Nick Young. Lakers bought him back for entertainment value...too bad he's a bum.
2014-15 Lakers Season Thread (21-61) KAT
- Thread in 'Sports & Training' Thread starter Started by CP1708,
- Start date
- Status
- 88,752
- 47,963
Yea market value for nick young was china 
- 37,513
- 13,010
Dave Mcmenamin wrote the Hawks, and a few other teams looked at him.
And Jodie Meeks got 3 year - $19mil... Marvin Williams 2 year - $14mil .... Yet you can't believe Nick Young didn't get a 4 year - $21.5mil offer anywhere else.
May be a year more than anyone wanted, myself included, but it certainly was at the very worst what his market value was around the league.
MVP
Supporter
- 83,004
- 85,572
What was Mitch smoking?
"When Nick became a free agent in June, I expressed hope that we would be able to bring him back on a contract that was in the best interest of both the Lakers and himself, and I am proud to say we were able to do so," Kupchak said in a statement. "Nick was a bright spot for us last season, and we are happy to retain such a skilled player who is committed to being a part of what we are building as a franchise."
"When Nick became a free agent in June, I expressed hope that we would be able to bring him back on a contract that was in the best interest of both the Lakers and himself, and I am proud to say we were able to do so," Kupchak said in a statement. "Nick was a bright spot for us last season, and we are happy to retain such a skilled player who is committed to being a part of what we are building as a franchise."
- 30,670
- 7,908
didn't eem bother to black text it
- 88,752
- 47,963
Well well well if isnt mr king himself
MVP
Supporter
- 83,004
- 85,572
It's April now, the wheels need to start turning on this hoops summit if we're really doing it. Anyone found a venue yet?
omariwestafari
Banned
- 3,323
- 1,531
Ok ima make a new thread soon about the hoop summit because this thread moves too fast. Ill make it in a couple daya
- 92,482
- 128,453
As long as Swaggy shoots threes at a good rate (this year he's been a hair above league average) he'll be worth his deal.
- 23,933
- 5,933
Dude, we dont want you to make a thread for it.
All youre going to do is attract a bunch of random lurkers who we dont even know to join the summit.
This is a private thing between us Laker fans and maybe a few other regulars from S&T.
We're not tryna get 80 people who we dont even know to show up and **** up the games, or worse yet just show up to troll.
Last edited:
- 8,790
- 1,989
This.Dude, we dont want you to make a thread for it.
All youre going to do is attract a bunch of random lurkers who we dont even know to join the summit.
This is a private thing between us Laker fans and maybe a few other regulars from S&T.
We're not tryna get 80 people who we dont even know to show up and **** up the games, or worse yet just show up to troll.
Would work better if we created a "Group Me" thread, or ever whatsapp.
- 7,560
- 596
It's all the other BS shots he takes!!!!
darthska
Staff member
- 46,911
- 31,473
[quote name="Essential1"][quote name="DaddyRabbit251"]Trade that gah damn pick to Sac-Town MITCH 
Randle too if they ask[/quote]Wait you would trade both picks for Cousins... Come on man...[/quote]Ad much as I initially wanted to hate on the idea of Boogie for Randle... I mean...
... Cousins IS what we hope Randle COULD BE. And Randle is coming off of a major injury. :\ Isn't a 'healthy now' more preferable than a 'recovering maybe'?
Randle too if they ask[/quote]Wait you would trade both picks for Cousins... Come on man...[/quote]Ad much as I initially wanted to hate on the idea of Boogie for Randle... I mean...
... Cousins IS what we hope Randle COULD BE. And Randle is coming off of a major injury. :\ Isn't a 'healthy now' more preferable than a 'recovering maybe'?
- 37,513
- 13,010
Wait you would trade both picks for Cousins... Come on man...[/quote]Ad much as I initially wanted to hate on the idea of Boogie for Randle... I mean...[quote name="Essential1"][quote name="DaddyRabbit251"]Trade that gah damn pick to Sac-Town MITCH
Randle too if they ask
... Cousins IS what we hope Randle COULD BE. And Randle is coming off of a major injury. :\ Isn't a 'healthy now' more preferable than a 'recovering maybe'?[/quote]
He's saying trade the Top 5 AND Randle.. That's the come on man
- 8,790
- 1,989
You just want a Kentucky guyAd much as I initially wanted to hate on the idea of Boogie for Randle... I mean...Originally Posted by Essential1Wait you would trade both picks for Cousins... Come on man...Originally Posted by DaddyRabbit251
Trade that gah damn pick to Sac-Town MITCH
Randle too if they ask
... Cousins IS what we hope Randle COULD BE. And Randle is coming off of a major injury.Isn't a 'healthy now' more preferable than a 'recovering maybe'?
IF we get KAT, I wouldn't dare trade him for Cousins.
darthska
Staff member
- 46,911
- 31,473
Ummmm, Randle, KAT, and Cousins are all UK guys.
Saying I would condone a Cousins/Randle trade because I just want a UK guy makes zero sense. Keeping Randle would also mean having a Kentucky guy.
And as enticing as it sounds, Lakers first. I want a productive guy. I'm not all for the Rondo possibilities. We had Meeks, and I never really liked that. Some days, yeah. But overall? Nah.
But if we could land Wall, Cousins, Eyebrows, keep Randle, and land KAT...
... smiles all around from this guy.
Saying I would condone a Cousins/Randle trade because I just want a UK guy makes zero sense. Keeping Randle would also mean having a Kentucky guy.
And as enticing as it sounds, Lakers first. I want a productive guy. I'm not all for the Rondo possibilities. We had Meeks, and I never really liked that. Some days, yeah. But overall? Nah.
But if we could land Wall, Cousins, Eyebrows, keep Randle, and land KAT...
... smiles all around from this guy.
- 37,287
- 19,666
- 37,513
- 13,010
He wasn't saying it as a likely scenario,
He's saying how he wants all Kentucky guys.. Except Rondo & Meeks
- 8,790
- 1,989
It was a joke my manUmmmm, Randle, KAT, and Cousins are all UK guys.
Saying I would condone a Cousins/Randle trade because I just want a UK guy makes zero sense. Keeping Randle would also mean having a Kentucky guy.
And as enticing as it sounds, Lakers first. I want a productive guy. I'm not all for the Rondo possibilities. We had Meeks, and I never really liked that. Some days, yeah. But overall? Nah.
But if we could land Wall, Cousins, Eyebrows, keep Randle, and land KAT...
... smiles all around from this guy.
I know all 3 are from there I just spaced out my next thought poorly, so I was just saying I wouldn't want to trade KAT or Okafor or even Russell for cousins. I would rather have a cost controlled asset then a max player who hasn't done much besides great stats. (sounds like Kevin Love)
If its Winslow or mudiay I'd probably bite and trade.
Last edited:
- 7,560
- 596
#3-5,NY and fillers for Cousins
- 8,790
- 1,989
Dwight Byke
Oh sorry I meant buycks
Oh sorry I meant buycks
darthska
Staff member
- 46,911
- 31,473
[quote name="CP1708"]PG Wall
SG Bledsoe.
SF Anthony Davis
PF KAT
C Cousins
6th Randle
B Rondo
B Meeks
B Prince
B Harrison brother. (Houston pick)
Play zone with the 3 7 footers, I could work with this.[/quote]Bruh.
View media item 831921View media item 822675View media item 732473
SG Bledsoe.
SF Anthony Davis
PF KAT
C Cousins
6th Randle
B Rondo
B Meeks
B Prince
B Harrison brother. (Houston pick)
Play zone with the 3 7 footers, I could work with this.[/quote]Bruh.
View media item 831921View media item 822675View media item 732473
- 92,482
- 128,453
Obviously I'm not in NBA locker rooms, but it would be interesting to see if management could persuade free agents to sign onto a team led by Kobe and Boogie.
- Status
