The argument was this: Dude said "intangibles don't matter" and I told the funny guy that the reason Draymond is "better" and ultimately more effective than Blake in spite of Blake's offensive numbers is because Green is 1) a smarter player, 2) tougher, 3) makes more big plays for his team, etc etc.
I said the same thing about Tyson Chandler in the playoffs with the Mavs vis a vis what DeAndre Jordan has been doing/not doing in the playoffs the last three plus years.
But sure, intangibles are overrated just because you can't quantify them LOL.
1) Draymond Green isn't better than Blake Griffin. Draymond will never be the best player on a 50+ win team. Never. Draymond Will never avg 22/8/5 on 50/34/70 with a 22 PER. Never. And that's Okay because what he does for GSW obviously is great. But he isn't the better player, or the more talented player. Everything Draymond Green is great at wouldn't look nearly as great if he was a #1 or #2 option.
And everything Tyson Chandler brought to Dallas in 11' wouldn't matter nearly as much if he wasn't playing with Dirk Friggin Nowtizki.
Again, circumstance matters. And YOU don't understand it and it's actually funny lol