dhtowng
Supporter
- 9,757
- 20,119
- Joined
- May 22, 2010
Of course it’s inconsistent because lighting and angles are inconsistent. Contrast will not show up in every photo. But I swear this is my last post about it and I’ll let y’all have it. These look like they’re gonna have pretty much the same “contrast” the 2000 pair had. If that wasn’t good enough for you then I say too bad. Y’all are something else. In 2019, (after all these years of REAL complaints for horrible quality retros of this model), we finally get remastered infrareds with durabuck, NA, 3m and good shape (a dream come true really) and we got people out here still finding a way to complain. I get it. “F Nike” “we the consumer” blah blah etc. I’ve done it on other releases myself (but only when reasonably warrented though. The ep height on the ‘18 BC3 was absurd and a lot of y’all ate that up and thought me and a few others were crazy for complaining about that legitimate HUGE flaw). But after seeing these last slew of photos, I think you’d only be playing yourself if you claim to pass on these because of the perceived presence of a “contrast heel” or lack there of. It’s silly. What’s sad is the stupid contrast heel is there but Idk know how noticeable some of you guys are expecting it to be. It’s just starting to get annoying.