- Apr 15, 2015
- 6,050
- 15,100
A Ma Maniere AJ3 - NO BUYING/SELLING/TRADING ALLOWED
- Thread in 'Jordan Brand' Thread starter Started by dblplay1212,
- Start date
dblplay1212
Supporter
- May 23, 2016
- 20,262
- 40,294
Id on shorts?
My girl had them thangs thang'n this weekend. Such a dope shoe.
- Dec 26, 2000
- 426
- 375
I'm sure they're from Target, or some other fast fashion store.
- May 2, 2010
- 17,224
- 23,574
Avoided this thread for a while cuz I just gave up on these
my point guard Shordy just scooped my size as a gift let’s ******* go
my point guard Shordy just scooped my size as a gift let’s ******* go
- May 11, 2019
- 2,806
- 4,359
IG on shorts?
- Feb 4, 2005
- 1,751
- 5,790
- Nov 26, 2015
- 24,441
- 22,120
These are so ****in great.
Some of you need to step up your sock game though. Damn.
Some of you need to step up your sock game though. Damn.
- Apr 9, 2017
- 17,045
- 47,295
I don't understand why so many people wear low top shoes and shorts with socks that go all the way up their calves...
- Nov 26, 2015
- 24,441
- 22,120
Lol can’t go too short or too high. Have to have the crews at the perfect height.
dblplay1212
Supporter
- May 23, 2016
- 20,262
- 40,294
Let us old white dudes live with our socks.
- Jan 24, 2016
- 1,383
- 10,890
This shoe is amazing, still loving it.
- Dec 1, 2011
- 750
- 643
We getting old man! That compression aids in circulation!
- Dec 29, 2003
- 9,935
- 34,632
- Apr 9, 2017
- 17,045
- 47,295
to me they are... and I ain't never heard of a lower top variation.
rbk93
Supporter
- Jun 29, 2016
- 14,287
- 13,628
I would...
- Dec 29, 2003
- 9,935
- 34,632
Interesting.
Because they're not lows. They're mids if anything...but closer to hi's.
Air Force 1 Lows...are lows. Dunk Lows....are lows. Air Jordan III's.....are not lows.
Ya'll blind?
Last edited:
- Apr 9, 2017
- 17,045
- 47,295
I call Jordan 11 highs too f all that mid talk
- Dec 29, 2003
- 9,935
- 34,632
But aren't Jordan III's and Jordan XI's about the same height? So to you and with that statement, wouldn't Jordan III's be hi's then too?
What is you talking about calling Jordan III's lows?
- Apr 9, 2017
- 17,045
- 47,295
I feel like 11s are noticably higher... But let's see
- Dec 29, 2003
- 9,935
- 34,632
They're def higher....but you're not getting my point and my question.
Why did/would you call Jordan III's lows?
This shouldn't be a 10 post discussion.
- Apr 9, 2017
- 17,045
- 47,295
Yeah you're tripping
- Dec 29, 2003
- 9,935
- 34,632
Yeah you're tripping
I'm tripping? You just proved my point with that picture. Thanks.
You tripping calling Jordan III's lows.
Go to your closet and grab a pair of Jordan 1 Lows, or Jordan 2 Lows and put them next to the ones in your picture. THOSE are lows.
#ThreadDerailment
- Apr 9, 2017
- 17,045
- 47,295
I just feel like with low top shoes your ankles are exposed.
rbk93
Supporter
- Jun 29, 2016
- 14,287
- 13,628
11s are a little bit taller, but not by much. Pulled my pairs out to compare as well.
Still can't imagine 3s anything other than a low top though.
Still can't imagine 3s anything other than a low top though.
