- 10,762
- 18,284
^that is a wild drop off. It’s literally a cliff
I wonder if it was a mistake and they just said **** it lol no way they cut them that way on purpose
On the Air Max? They stayed that way for like 5 years. It was definitely on purpose.
A Ma Maniere AJ5 *** UPDATE *** Feds enter the chat
- Thread in 'Jordan Brand' Thread starter Started by dblplay1212,
- Start date
On the Air Max? They stayed that way for like 5 years. It was definitely on purpose.
- 10,762
- 18,284
Either way man. You know they looked like that for 5 years.
dblplay1212
Supporter
- 20,203
- 40,133
Oh they were bad from 2010-early 2017, was just pointing out you used a gs version from 2017, not 2012 as you posted.
- 2,692
- 5,505
Seperate sizing for womens and mens anything, and vanity sizing in clothing is ridiculous. I wish we could just go to unisex sizing like the UK sizing.
- 2,636
- 1,718
Never said that nor did I imply it. If people want them then they should do what they feel is necessary to acquire them.
- 85,106
- 113,872
White ones for me
Last edited:
- 22,343
- 32,535
The 23 almost ruins it for me but still cop
- 14,833
- 20,532
Maybe its just me, but im unbothered by this toe. Maybe the thick toe box pairs are GS sizes?
- 6,291
- 11,652
I feel like some of you complain about the designs on your own NBYs.
...just to complain about something.
"The yellow midsole just ruins it for me."
Um...that was your design.
...just to complain about something.
"The yellow midsole just ruins it for me."
Um...that was your design.
dblplay1212
Supporter
- 20,203
- 40,133
What's vanity sizing?
- 205
- 117
Anyone got a stock number on both? Or own any they usually drop in there releases ?
what a lame excuse - crocs uses EQL and they don’t change a fee
dblplay1212
Supporter
- 20,203
- 40,133
Your hard on for all things Whittaker Group is hilarious.
It's new:
We’re introducing a Run Fair® Fee
The reason we started EQL is because we wanted to create a level playing field to get the products we’re passionate about, and we felt that didn’t exist yet.
www.eql.com
- 64,966
- 196,177
At least it is only for winners
Having to pay an "L" tax would be crazy.
Having to pay an "L" tax would be crazy.
- 33,427
- 39,199
It shouldn’t be for winners or losers. NO ONE should be ok with this.
dblplay1212
Supporter
- 20,203
- 40,133
The fee is high to me but I'm cool with $1-2 if someone can actually filter all the bot entries out. A 3rd party isn't going to do that for free and it's too much to ask for a store to do over and over and over.
- 768
- 777
I don’t necessarily have a problem with A fee but i dont think it should be a percentage of the retail price. It should be a standardized flat fee.
- 14,999
- 4,264
Men over size 10.5 can't buy women's shows thats the thing. TO your point I`m saying mens but I`m just saying drop gendered show sizing for athletic sneakers and just use the Mens scale as the baseline (since it already is). I`m sure there is enough data out there where finding the right product size ratios shouldn't be that difficult in 2023.
Like for example the Satin 1s weren't inclusive as a women's shoe, and its based on a "mens" shoe so why shouldn't men have the opportunity to buy?
dblplay1212
Supporter
- 20,203
- 40,133
I don't disagree. I'd just make it the EU sizing, all mm, instead of going with "mens" sizing. Just drop all gender and go with measurements. Fwiw some men's shoes start at size 8 so a lot of women get shut out. My wife wears a men's 7 for example and she can't buy shoes that start at men's 8.
- 3,088
- 3,643
doublemesh96 already nailed it, but the tip is damn near straight up and down on these. There should be more material and it should taper back a little bit instead of just falling straight off. Nike got REALLY bad with the Air Max 1 before "remastering" them and getting things back to a more normal shape.
Air Max 1 circa 2012:
Air Max 1 30th Anniversary Remaster:
EDIT:
There. More cliff toes circa 2012. Is that betterdblplay1212 ?
Oof I see your point. It’s like a cliff! No sleek or slope to it.
- 9,868
- 34,346
Vanity sizing is the labeling of clothing with a size smaller than the actual cut of the items. In other words, your size 34 might actually be a size 36, or larger. This is done to make the customer feel better about themselves and to make them buy more clothing.
- 4,874
- 6,690
Will go for the black pair. If I hit, great. Otherwise I'll be cool.
aepps20
Supporter
- 42,525
- 90,732
I've never needed a White more than I need these.
Last edited:
