- 8,148
- 3,548
Hate to do comparisons , but the comfort was already there in the 2.0 and 1.0, what the 3.0 is lacking is hell of aesthetics and the material to me feels like b grades when compared.
ADIDAS BOOST Thread - PAGE 1 for INFO- *NO BUYING/SELLING/TRADING*
- Thread in 'Other Brands' Thread starter Started by jpac,
- Start date
- 11,972
- 7,934
1.0 and 2.0 were already obviously very comfy, but 3.0 is more comfy.
- 11,972
- 7,934
Yeah I don't mind it much either, but drisk was saying he wanted some without branding.
- 8,148
- 3,548
The gap isn't as big as to really matter. To me personally. To each his own right
- 85,084
- 113,744
I could mess with these
- 4,103
- 1,518
To me it is. I wear my CB 3.0 almost daily. Whenever I go back to a 1.0 they feel tight *** hell. Obviously just personal choice though.
- 5,850
- 2,770
For a narrow foot like mine, it actually is for me. To the point that it got me real picky. If NCs,TCs and even gray LTDs I would insta-cop if they were 1.0s. But 3.0s got me passing.
- 5,850
- 2,770
haha we are on opposite sides of spectrum. But only in the case I would actually take a 3.0 CB over a 1.0 CB since CBs/OGs were the tightest all-time for me.
- 8,148
- 3,548
- 1,517
- 1,612
3.0 has the worst knit pattern
- 13,375
- 6,892
sounds good, thanks guys. i'll just go rls, the branding really isnt that bothersome if they're the best comparing laces.
- 11,972
- 7,934
It wasn't a conversation about aesthetics.
But if you wanna go there, 2.0 knit pattern is by far the worst.
- 1,517
- 1,612
nah...Anything with cat faces on by far worst...denial is a bad thing. Unless you like looking at Garfield all day
- 2,465
- 2,028
It had potential. All we saw were ugly gradient patterns, but the tonal knit on the havens and mi adidas is not bad at all.
- 5,850
- 2,770
I actually like the quality of RLS laces more than stock.
Try the acetone technique, but caution that it can/might melt the lace tip haha.
- 11,972
- 7,934
FOH w/ that "denial" BS.
- 5,850
- 2,770
I actually don't see it as much as before. Kinda blown outta proportion at this point.
If you haven't copped a 3.0, you missing out on some dope CWs.
- 13,375
- 6,892
nail polish remover might work too.
also on the knit thing, the cat face is on like 2-3 3.0s, its not on them all.
Last edited:
- 5,254
- 7,898
- 1,517
- 1,612
Not if the only nice CW on a 3.0 are better on a 1.0 & 2.0..there is no need... Havent seen a 3.0 out there that would make me waste 180$ & own 25 pairs
- 11,972
- 7,934
Any anyone who has a different opinion is in denial due to people on the internet saying there's a cat face in the shoe?
- 5,850
- 2,770
Well that's why you buy most of them under retail and buy the premium ones at below resell market value.
Plus, it's difficult to cop any CW equivalent in the 1.0 of any 3.0 that is out right now. Unless you have those then no need to mess with 3.0s.
Only 3.0s I've copped are CWs to preserve my 1.0 pairs and have a little variety and CWs not in any other generation (oreos/CNYs)
- 1,517
- 1,612
Especially the ones not late to the UB party...we duidnt jump on the UB wave Cuz Teddy or his Salads
- 4,103
- 1,518
I'd trade my OG's for some ash purples but don't think that deal would ever come up .
- 7,603
- 4,330
Make no mistake, this is a bag that I will NEVER check.. all I need is someone who knows sneakers to see this coming down the ramp.. they're gonna know right off the bat that its worth looking into... its clutch that these bags are also TSA approved size
Last edited:
