Aquamanjay_
formerly jaylaw15
- 8,180
- 9,262
Undeniably an icy 2009 pair.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Can't tell if the new ones or not calling NT detectives
Nah, I saw the blueish JmanWe sure they're not 72-10s?
The Outsole looks a lot more translucent than the 72-10s. Additionally, it looks like mesh and patent leather instead of leather and iridescent patent leatherWe sure they're not 72-10s?
This. This is a great time to build a collection.
Yeah just do it. Everything's gonna come back out again eventually anywaysContemplating selling off my '09 Jams, '10 Cool Greys and '11 Concords (and keep my 72-10s, Breds, Columbias) in leiu of them releasing correctly in the coming years. I rarely sell my shoes but probably gonna get rid of those in particular. JB should be ashamed of themselves to release the 11s that way knowing they were capable of this. I especially hate the shape and low pl cut of the '09 SJs despite how much I glorify the cw.
Contemplating selling off my '09 Jams, '10 Cool Greys and '11 Concords (and keep my 72-10s, Breds, Columbias) in leiu of them releasing correctly in the coming years. I rarely sell my shoes but probably gonna get rid of those in particular. JB should be ashamed of themselves to release the 11s that way knowing they were capable of this. I especially hate the shape and low pl cut of the '09 SJs despite how much I glorify the cw.
I'm most definitely catchin' SUPER hell, fire & brimstone...
Off these pics.
Remember, before y'all GO in , and tear me a new one.
These pics only give us somethin' to look at, & talk about.... While we wait, & nothin' more.
The infamous bannana Breds from 2000, when the sellers invaded NT and made them willingly buy fakes don't look anything like this.These are shaped how fake XI's were shaped back in the early 2000's [emoji]128534[/emoji]
I'm most definitely catchin' SUPER hell, fire & brimstone...
Off these pics.
Remember, before y'all GO in , and tear me a new one.
These pics only give us somethin' to look at, & talk about.... While we wait, & nothin' more.
The infamous bannana Breds from 2000, when the sellers invaded NT and made them willingly buy fakes don't look anything like this.
These look pretty much like the Gammas with a higher cut.
Originally Posted by X-Alt The infamous banana Breds from 2000, when the sellers invaded NT and made them willingly buy fakes don't look anything like this.These look pretty much like the Gammas with a higher cut.
I'm most definitely catchin' SUPER hell, fire & brimstone... Off these pics.Remember, before y'all GO in , and tear me a new one. These pics only give us somethin' to look at, & talk about.... While we wait, & nothin' more.
I'm not an advocate of fakes, but it's all some can afford. Can't hate on that.
True blue 3s and space jams, my wallet finna hurt
A good pair of fake Legend blues or Royals will go for about 80 dollars of Kinstor.You're taking the thread to a whole different route... But I'll add my insight. Back in the day fakes were called "fakes", looked HORRIBLE and they ran about $60-$100, which goes along with your theory about affordability. But now you have these "unauthorized" fakes that damn near look like the real shoes to the naked eye and cost damn near retail. So back then fakes were about saving $$$, but now-a-days people buy fakes because they were unable to purchase a real pair due to the low supply and high demand of the shoes....
I'm not an advocate of fakes, but it's all some can afford. Can't hate on that.
If the choice was between Eagle pro wings and fake 11s?