- 42,884
- 43,435
Just wear the damn shoes.Who have time just to checkout an off centered jumpman while walking?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Just wear the damn shoes.Who have time just to checkout an off centered jumpman while walking?
You can't possibly be talking about materials. Not a speck of real leather is on these things.
Why would they coat them with polyurethane!? Isn't that why they're so stiff and unnaturalIt actually has split grain leather that is polyurethane coated. I know leather, plus the scratch on my Pair from NDC took some of the coating off and revealed it, lol. True though!
When you open the box and see shiny pleather that's stiff as some steel toe cowboy boots, and then you take the shoe out toYou all kill me with this "off-centered" Jumpman talk. "It's a millimeter off... JB sucks!" LMFAO. NT is pure entertainment.
Why would they coat them with polyurethane!? Isn't that why they're so stiff and unnatural :\
I just heard the Bug's VIII's might be using this same leather, the Grape V's will also.. HOW MANY RETROS WILL BE RUINED WITH THIS POLYURETHANE COATED SPLIT GRAIN LEATHER!?
All we're asking for is a decent white leather
I'm quick to complain because I actually owned the Air Jordan V "White/Metallic" that came out in 2000. Those were the days where I would actually receive an Eastbay ctalog in the mail and phone my order through (like I did with these), which were on clearance at the time. I wore those things to the ground, and they didn't have this leather at all. The leather was completely different and not stiff. It lasted me 2+ years in those shoes, so yeah I would say the leather on the 2000 V's held up pretty darn good.Yeah, the coating makes it stiffer, but more sturdy and it would last a lot longer than leather alone. The seats in cars are the same way, they have to be coated to prevent bleeding and other damage only difference is most of the time cars have full grain, compared to shoes being split grain. People are so quick to complain, you have to first recognize the benefits before you down the quality of the materials being used.
I'm quick to complain because I actually owned the Air Jordan V "White/Metallic" that came out in 2000. I wore those things to the ground, and they didn't have this leather at all. The leather was completely different and not stiff. It lasted me 2+ years in those shoes, so yeah I would say the leather on the 2000 V's held up pretty darn good.
Before you're quick to judge, realize some of us have owned retro pairs before.. so we have a "base" to compare these new ones to.
Just wear the damn shoes.Who have time just to checkout an off centered jumpman while walking?
I found a good article on why JB changed the leather >
"Material – Something else that has changed due to the casual wearer… the leather uppers. This particular colorway has a leather upper that is comprised of a ‘split’ grain. I went over this briefly in my video review featuring the Air Jordan IV Retro. Its far to complicated to go over here but its basically a cheaper way to manufacture leather and the U.S. determines anything with leather used as a full grain even though it isn’t. After the manufacturer spits the leather they place a top coat, usually made from polyurethane, over the top and it ends up looking like leather but its far more rigid… this saves the brand money while they still use ‘Full Grain’ leather and it helps with creasing. Unfortunate but true…
One good thing about this type of leather is that its durable. It will eventually crack once the top coat gets dried out but when being put through the rigors of on-court action it will hold up a lot better than premium Full Grain leather. This doesn’t mean I prefer the use of this type of leather but I figured I try to explain the pros and cons… personally, I prefer actual leather since there is less break-in time required."
http://nightwing2303.com/first-impression-air-jordan-iv-4-retro/
So your point is to never question why JB switched to the cheaper materials and that we should never question it? There's other companies that use "full grain leather" in there shoes. The price of Jordan's continues to GO UP, then why does the QUALITY GO DOWN?First, nobody is judging anyone. Second, What's the point of comparing? And to a older Retro...really. Anyway. Prices for leather have changed. If you continue to compare things as they were 13 years ago, life will pass you by. Companies are starting to use "leather alternatives" to ease the rising cost of leather. For example, go to a high end furniture store and pick the most expensive leather sofa, notice the newer products only contain real leather " where you touch". Meaning, only the areas that are frequently touched have real leather, others are synthetic. Another example is the use of sued or microfiber...this is getting big in automotive. My ZL1 is 80% suede, which is cheaper than leather. Pretty much every new Ford has half sued and half polyurethane coated leather.
I disagree, the older "softer" leather has proven to hold up. Have you ever owned a pair w the older leather? They lasted me over 2 years..I just pretty much said the exact same thing. Polyurethane coated, it benefits us in the long run. Just like the blue tint everyone is also "complaining" about.