- 389
- 10
- Joined
- Jul 30, 2011
Tech Gray?
Air Jordan IV White/Cement 2012 Via Modern Notoriety Update **Nov 2nd 2011** 1st Page VOL ON POINT!
- Thread in 'Jordan Brand' Thread starter Started by wreckinkickz,
- Start date
- Status
- 389
- 10
- Joined
- Jul 30, 2011
Tech Gray?
- 3,764
- 532
- Joined
- Mar 3, 2004
These, playoffs , obsidians, chi 10s, fire red 4s, and a new icy pair of columbias will be my retirement.
- 3,764
- 532
- Joined
- Mar 3, 2004
These, playoffs , obsidians, chi 10s, fire red 4s, and a new icy pair of columbias will be my retirement.
- 7,757
- 9,432
- Joined
- Apr 30, 2011
Completely Fire. One can only hope the rest of the IVs use this mold. It's noticeably better than all the IVs since 1999.
- 7,757
- 9,432
- Joined
- Apr 30, 2011
Completely Fire. One can only hope the rest of the IVs use this mold. It's noticeably better than all the IVs since 1999.
- 9,380
- 11,574
- Joined
- Aug 15, 2009
I think this will be the new mold for the IVs. they probably destroyed the ones from 2006 and had to create it. Not to mention that Jordan Brand pays attention to this thread and made a note of all the things wrong with the 2006 IVs and tried to remedy it (this also happened with the XI and VII molds, where the shapes got changed to look closer to their OG counterparts).
best part is that they finally fixed the toebox and made the shoe look more stubby rather than elongated
I don't know about everyone else, but im pleased with the outcome. Sorry to beat a dead horse but I havent been this excited about a new release in a LONG time. Every since my 99s cracked, ive been too scared to buy another pair. And now, I can buy 2-3 pairs for what a DS pair would cost. THANK YOU JB!
- 9,380
- 11,574
- Joined
- Aug 15, 2009
I think this will be the new mold for the IVs. they probably destroyed the ones from 2006 and had to create it. Not to mention that Jordan Brand pays attention to this thread and made a note of all the things wrong with the 2006 IVs and tried to remedy it (this also happened with the XI and VII molds, where the shapes got changed to look closer to their OG counterparts).
best part is that they finally fixed the toebox and made the shoe look more stubby rather than elongated
I don't know about everyone else, but im pleased with the outcome. Sorry to beat a dead horse but I havent been this excited about a new release in a LONG time. Every since my 99s cracked, ive been too scared to buy another pair. And now, I can buy 2-3 pairs for what a DS pair would cost. THANK YOU JB!
- 42,834
- 43,310
- Joined
- Jun 23, 2009
Does JB/Nike really spy on NT?
- 42,834
- 43,310
- Joined
- Jun 23, 2009
Does JB/Nike really spy on NT?
- 12,885
- 2,739
- Joined
- Aug 6, 2001
That's the same %++ %*!##!% mold they been using what the hell are yall looking at??
- 12,885
- 2,739
- Joined
- Aug 6, 2001
That's the same %++ %*!##!% mold they been using what the hell are yall looking at??
ohdannyboy
Banned
- 5,465
- 12
- Joined
- Apr 5, 2010
Numbers wise? Yes. But demand will be completely different. I can't speak for any other areas, but around here people didn't mess with the white and cements or the TB's.
ohdannyboy
Banned
- 5,465
- 12
- Joined
- Apr 5, 2010
Numbers wise? Yes. But demand will be completely different. I can't speak for any other areas, but around here people didn't mess with the white and cements or the TB's.
- 6,998
- 2,790
- Joined
- Feb 10, 2008
Lol word. I swear the first set of pics looked way better than this batch. These new pics just look like the cdp, mars, etc.. shape. I'm not even going to complain anymore though because overall they look good.
- 6,998
- 2,790
- Joined
- Feb 10, 2008
Lol word. I swear the first set of pics looked way better than this batch. These new pics just look like the cdp, mars, etc.. shape. I'm not even going to complain anymore though because overall they look good.
- 9,380
- 11,574
- Joined
- Aug 15, 2009
I dont think so. They definitely made a change somewhere. These 2012s dont look nearly as boxy as the Mars
- 9,380
- 11,574
- Joined
- Aug 15, 2009
I dont think so. They definitely made a change somewhere. These 2012s dont look nearly as boxy as the Mars
- 446
- 10
- Joined
- Nov 2, 2011
Just me or does the grey seem really dark?
- 446
- 10
- Joined
- Nov 2, 2011
Just me or does the grey seem really dark?
- 1,084
- 11
- Joined
- Mar 10, 2008
Compared to the '99, yes. Compared to the OG, not so much...
- 1,084
- 11
- Joined
- Mar 10, 2008
Compared to the '99, yes. Compared to the OG, not so much...
- 112
- 10
- Joined
- May 25, 2005
that last picture makes these finally look good
- 112
- 10
- Joined
- May 25, 2005
that last picture makes these finally look good
- 2,096
- 20
- Joined
- Mar 2, 2009
From the early pictures, one of the best retros in years.Originally Posted by sthebest
I think this will be the new mold for the IVs. they probably destroyed the ones from 2006 and had to create it. Not to mention that Jordan Brand pays attention to this thread and made a note of all the things wrong with the 2006 IVs and tried to remedy it (this also happened with the XI and VII molds, where the shapes got changed to look closer to their OG counterparts).
best part is that they finally fixed the toebox and made the shoe look more stubby rather than elongated
I don't know about everyone else, but im pleased with the outcome. Sorry to beat a dead horse but I havent been this excited about a new release in a LONG time. Every since my 99s cracked, ive been too scared to buy another pair. And now, I can buy 2-3 pairs for what a DS pair would cost. THANK YOU JB!
- Status
