Originally Posted by Napoleon
Two things
at NT for banning the abbreviation for Homosexual
at people who FAILED to pay attention in intro biology. Evolution isn't that complicated. The article isn't using the correct language and is throwing people off.
The struggle continues.
I feel you but for me, it definitely is not Adam and Eve.
I feel you but for me, it definitely is not Adam and Eve.
What is going on in this conversation?Originally Posted by Faint Dj3
I feel you but for me, it definitely is not Adam and Eve.
I personally believe that defining moment has not/will not ever be "found". its like for that to be found, the first humans would have to had be fossilized.
I do believe the first humans were in Africa though, saw a special on it couple years ago.
What is going on in this conversation?Originally Posted by Faint Dj3
I feel you but for me, it definitely is not Adam and Eve.
I personally believe that defining moment has not/will not ever be "found". its like for that to be found, the first humans would have to had be fossilized.
I do believe the first humans were in Africa though, saw a special on it couple years ago.
Originally Posted by Faint Dj3
I feel you but for me, it definitely is not Adam and Eve.
I personally believe that defining moment has not/will not ever be "found". its like for that to be found, the first humans would have to had be fossilized.
I do believe the first humans were in Africa though, saw a special on it couple years ago.
Originally Posted by Faint Dj3
I feel you but for me, it definitely is not Adam and Eve.
I personally believe that defining moment has not/will not ever be "found". its like for that to be found, the first humans would have to had be fossilized.
I do believe the first humans were in Africa though, saw a special on it couple years ago.
TeamJordan79 wrote:
I feel you but for me, it definitely is not Adam and Eve.
I personally believe that defining moment has not/will not ever be "found". its like for that to be found, the first humans would have to had be fossilized.
I do believe the first humans were in Africa though, saw a special on it couple years ago.
Like how do we know for certain that the first "humans" came from Africa, because we found some remains there that resemble our own? What about the potential remains that we didnt find that could possibly exist other areas of the world in South America for example. What about ancient human remains that existed and dont exist anymore? Does that wipe out our history? Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.
That's why you have to find your own truth. That type of thinking will always leave you thinking hypothetically and finding an infinite amount of realities. Good luck with that...
TeamJordan79 wrote:
I feel you but for me, it definitely is not Adam and Eve.
I personally believe that defining moment has not/will not ever be "found". its like for that to be found, the first humans would have to had be fossilized.
I do believe the first humans were in Africa though, saw a special on it couple years ago.
Like how do we know for certain that the first "humans" came from Africa, because we found some remains there that resemble our own? What about the potential remains that we didnt find that could possibly exist other areas of the world in South America for example. What about ancient human remains that existed and dont exist anymore? Does that wipe out our history? Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.
That's why you have to find your own truth. That type of thinking will always leave you thinking hypothetically and finding an infinite amount of realities. Good luck with that...
