- 21,800
- 3,553
- Joined
- Mar 8, 2010
*takes Xta off ignore* damn...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Originally Posted by bijald0331
Man... I have to read all this now...
Originally Posted by bijald0331
Man... I have to read all this now...
@#$% man, try typin it.Originally Posted by toine2983
Originally Posted by bijald0331
Man... I have to read all this now...
I know right.
@#$% man, try typin it.Originally Posted by toine2983
Originally Posted by bijald0331
Man... I have to read all this now...
I know right.
Originally Posted by Xtapolapacetl
Be in the same ball park? You're treating my mentioning of LeBron winning rings with Shaq as if I mentioned some completely random player. And you want to talk about ball parks? That's not the same ball park. That's not even the same league. Hell, it's not even the same sport. Therefore, you best believe I'm bringing up old Bill Wennington. LeBron is seen by most analysts as the best, or at worst as one of the very best players in the league for some time now. But that doesn't matter to you. In the end, what matters is that he didn't win (we don't even have to discuss the supporting casts he didn't win with anymore), therefore mentioning that this non-winner would win 5-6 rings with Shaq is ridiculous, right? So you best believe I'm going to flip it: Everyone knows that Bill Wennington was a bad player, but hey he has 3 rings on his fingers. That's what matters. You damn right comparing Bill Wennington to LeBron is stupid. That's the whole damn point. Pointing out the stupidity. So you pretty much agree: Saying that someone is better because he has rings is stupid. And I will continue to bring up this "stupid" example to point out the stupidity of someone saying that rings are the sole factor that a certain player is better than a certain other player. Ok, then I'll play your same stupid game. Kobe woulda won at least 3 titles with the Cavs. I mean, since we don't have to prove any damn thing, why not go with that? You keep bringing up Bill Wennington, my point was simple, when you compare two elite guys and you get down to splitting hairs, which we were doing (or so I thought) then you HAVE to bring up winning or not winning. I get that that is a sore subject for you, I get that the Cavs are not a model franchise but you see buddy, just as you go insane on Laker/Kobe fans for the ridiculous claims they make, the same exact thing can be said about Bron/Cavs supporters while they boatraced the NBA regular season. All those guys were RAMPANT across the nation the last two years. And when it comes down to it, the fact is one has 5, the other has 0. You can make up all the different reasons you want, some valid, some pointless, some might be close, whatever one has won and climbed the mountain, the other has not. That is what I used when I said you can't just switch Kobe and Bron like it's nothing, and the Lakers would have won this that or the other. Both guys are elite, Bill Wennington is not. Nobody in here has said even one time Horry > MJ or anything close, we're talking about two guys who carry their teams, one has won, the other has not. For all the different reasons there are.
And we don't even have to go to examples that are as extreme as Bill Wennington. Chauncey Billups, Tony Parker and Paul Pierce are all Finals MVPs. It can be said that they led their teams to a championship. Are these three players better than LeBron James, Charles Barkley and Karl Malone? Addressed above. Nobody said anything close to TP > Malone. That's your extreme angle, nobody elses.
The least you can do is try to compare the situations LeBron and Kobe were in when they entered the league as objectively as you can, and I know that this is very hard for you. One was playing with a center that was about to become like a kid in a candy store with the lack of centers the late 90s and early 00s would bring, while the other one was stuck on a franchise whose best result ever was one or two eastern conference finals appearances and who won 17 games the season before LeBron's arrival, and are about to win around 17 games again this season as soon as LeBron left. See, that's the thing we don't have a luxury of. If Kobe would have been kept by the Hornets, then maybe we would have a better idea of the two players. But that isn't what happened. Maybe if Kobe is given the keys at 18 and told to do whatever he wanted, who knows what would have happened. He could be better, he could be worse, he could be in jail, he could have retired already, he could be TMac never makin it out the first round, he could have 10 titles, THERE'S NO WAY TO KNOW. I know this. He was placed on a team in 04 that was utter garbage. And in 4 years, they were in the finals. That's fairly close to getting drafted on a crap team and carrying them. Like I said already, Bron certainly could have done major work had he been drafted to LA with Shaq. I said they coulda won 1, 2, maybe even 3. Again, nobody knows, but you said clearly 6 "Imaginary rings" > 4 (now 5) real ones. One of the dumbest claims I have ever seen. What's funny to me is here I am arguing all this crap, and did you know that back in 2000 I was just happy the Lakers got the 1?I remember thinking, there, Shaq and Kobe are off the hook, now they can just play out there careers, everything else is house money. Then they won again, and then again, then it was over, then everyone tried to take those 3 and put them all on Shaq, then Kobe and Phil and Fish won again and I said, whew, now that's over, Kobe can just finish out his career, nobody can say nothing, then they won again.......I'M UP TO FIVE RINGS NOW, and still people like you discredit every single one of them like he's (let's see, one of your comparisons..........) Corey Brewer or something. Just a SG in the NBA, nothing more.The Cavs are not the Lakers, everybody knows that, everybody except for Cavs fans and Lebron fans that claimed he would own the world after every move they made. I been at this for years, I said for 3 years straight, the Cavs weren't contenders. I never wavered either. So you can claim all the fools that said they had the best supporting cast, that ain't on my record. No no no. I was upfront, Cavs won't win @#$% and I was right.
And you keep calling me a LeBron rider, but none of this compares to LeBron hating. Do I read LeBron's twitter? Do I scan practice, pre- and post-game interviews to find quotes about him? Or do I do that about Kobe for that matter, do I try to find some quote of his to start a thread about? No, because I know damn well that no matter how "dumb" LeBron is in the stuff he says, or how "intelligent" Kobe is, or how much of a **** MJ is to Chamillionaire and in his HOF speech, it won't change how good he is on the court. And really, the only reason you're doing this is because you're insecure and you somehow hope that pointing out something stupid LeBron tweeted will somehow help you in an argument about who's the better basketball player, which it won't. You haters better worry about the intelligence of someone who may actually affect your lives, like Sarah Palin instead of a basketball player's. I've seen you homerize Kobe in plenty of threads where the Kobe-LeBron discussion was brought up, before I even replied in that thread. Don't even try to convince me that you aren't a Kobe homer. I don't read Bron's twitter either. I don't scan interviews. What I do is frequent the NBA thread on a daily basis on NT. And I occasionally see stuff that he says, or does that is lame. And I talk about them. Put a lame quote out there by Baron Davis, and I'll laugh and make fun of that too. And I have never said you start threads about anybody, I know you don't, you should notice that I don't start a lot of threads about either of them either. If I see something interesting or stupid, or whatever, I'll go in and comment (much like this thread) and if someone starts up a convo, I'll go with it. Call out Dan Marino and I'll be there too.Call out Lamar Odom, whoever you want, if its my team and I have an opinion on it, I'll give it. I already said that. I don't care if that gets me the Kobe homer label, I've watched close to 1,000 games he's played in, I'm pretty well versed. Like I said, if people are in there talkin nothin, I leave, if they talk stupid, I speak up. Not hard to figure out.
And about scapgoating Gasol.. That's the whole problem. Somehow, blaming Kobe never is a part of the "heat of the moment". Other scapegoats are always looked for first.. Unless Kobe plays like complete garbage and you have NO excuse whatsoever.. And even then you sometimes try to put a positive spin by saying something like "At least he's the only trying to make something happen"... Or blame his poor performance on some dislocated finger, an on-off injury which mysteriously doesn't bother him on the nights when he's shooting well. I don't think you read the Laker thread enough, plenty of people get pissed at Kobe, but sure there are some that claim at least he's trying etc etc, I do the same during a given game if there's merit, he goes harder in those typical dead Laker games then most others. You tellin me you never seen Lamar sleepwalk? Or Bynum? Or Pau? Kobe and Fish give their best every game, but Fish isn't the same talent level obviously. For that, they get alot of credit (from me) even though most Laker fans hate Fisher. The real Laker fans, that get it, don't mind Fish, we know where he'll be when it matters. And you will take note right now, I have yet to bring up his injuries at all in this thread. (other then him being out in 04) You want to discredit a guy playing with different injuries, that's fine by me, I don't care. They get mentioned when he's being talked about, I am aware of that. If you want to shut that part down, I don't mind.
@ "But nobody with half a brain cares about a regular season "big" game." Spoken like a true two straight Christmas day games loser. One of the best examples of criteria customization on the part of Kobe extremists. Back when Shaq was up 4-3 in rings won, regular season performances was all that mattered to you. And one particular regular season game against the Raptors was used as propaganda to make all kinds of claims about Kobe, that he is better than MJ, that he is GOAT, etc. But after the Gasol trade when the Lakers started winning, it's amazing how all of a sudden regular season performances didn't matter. The same when it comes to your treatment of a discussion about stats. LeBron has better stats than Kobe, but you try to skip past this by claiming that stats don't tell the whole story, or that stats don't matter at all. Oh yeah. Stats don't matter all right.. Except on a night where there is "81" in the "pts" section next to "Bryant, Kobe" on a box score. Then you better believe regular season game stats matter.Laugh all you want, trust me, it's been my stance for YEARS. Ask any NBA fan that comes in here and has had any sort of discussion with me. Ask any of them. Go read the NBA thread the last 3 years, go read the Laker thread, you will see me with dozens of quotes of the regular season doesn't matter. I don't care if you have "other" Laker fans you want to use as an example, I'm not them, they don't speak for me. You are right, we lost on Christmas last year, badly..........that worked out how for the Cavs, and more importantly, the Lakers?Yeah, that's right, worked out great for us, so why the hell do you think the regular season matters again? And so you know, we won the Christmas before that. So that's two years, 1-1 on Christmas, won a title each year, so tell me the effect of those "big" regular seasons games on us. There is no effect, it's a regular season game. The Cavs stomped us, the Heat stomped us. Kinda hard to get up for a game in December when you really want to play games in June. But yeah, those games sure did matter to Bron. He had points to prove.I barely have said 5 words on 81. I could care less. The 62 actually was cooler to me since he outscored a whole team, but those were teams going nowhere. You go ahead and think those games mean a lot to me, fine by me, but as I said, check my numerous posts saying the regular season don't matter. There's a lot of them. If you mean in terms of overall career wise, numbers, categories, yeah that stuff matters at the end of a career, but in terms of during a specific season, do I want to win on Christmas, or do I want to win in June, hmmmmmmm geeeeee, lemmmmmme think........yeah. All the regular season stuff is to look back at what guys have done for thier careers. Big picture type stuff, not game by game by game. That stuff don't matter regardless of what you try to say for me.
Originally Posted by Xtapolapacetl
Be in the same ball park? You're treating my mentioning of LeBron winning rings with Shaq as if I mentioned some completely random player. And you want to talk about ball parks? That's not the same ball park. That's not even the same league. Hell, it's not even the same sport. Therefore, you best believe I'm bringing up old Bill Wennington. LeBron is seen by most analysts as the best, or at worst as one of the very best players in the league for some time now. But that doesn't matter to you. In the end, what matters is that he didn't win (we don't even have to discuss the supporting casts he didn't win with anymore), therefore mentioning that this non-winner would win 5-6 rings with Shaq is ridiculous, right? So you best believe I'm going to flip it: Everyone knows that Bill Wennington was a bad player, but hey he has 3 rings on his fingers. That's what matters. You damn right comparing Bill Wennington to LeBron is stupid. That's the whole damn point. Pointing out the stupidity. So you pretty much agree: Saying that someone is better because he has rings is stupid. And I will continue to bring up this "stupid" example to point out the stupidity of someone saying that rings are the sole factor that a certain player is better than a certain other player. Ok, then I'll play your same stupid game. Kobe woulda won at least 3 titles with the Cavs. I mean, since we don't have to prove any damn thing, why not go with that? You keep bringing up Bill Wennington, my point was simple, when you compare two elite guys and you get down to splitting hairs, which we were doing (or so I thought) then you HAVE to bring up winning or not winning. I get that that is a sore subject for you, I get that the Cavs are not a model franchise but you see buddy, just as you go insane on Laker/Kobe fans for the ridiculous claims they make, the same exact thing can be said about Bron/Cavs supporters while they boatraced the NBA regular season. All those guys were RAMPANT across the nation the last two years. And when it comes down to it, the fact is one has 5, the other has 0. You can make up all the different reasons you want, some valid, some pointless, some might be close, whatever one has won and climbed the mountain, the other has not. That is what I used when I said you can't just switch Kobe and Bron like it's nothing, and the Lakers would have won this that or the other. Both guys are elite, Bill Wennington is not. Nobody in here has said even one time Horry > MJ or anything close, we're talking about two guys who carry their teams, one has won, the other has not. For all the different reasons there are.
And we don't even have to go to examples that are as extreme as Bill Wennington. Chauncey Billups, Tony Parker and Paul Pierce are all Finals MVPs. It can be said that they led their teams to a championship. Are these three players better than LeBron James, Charles Barkley and Karl Malone? Addressed above. Nobody said anything close to TP > Malone. That's your extreme angle, nobody elses.
The least you can do is try to compare the situations LeBron and Kobe were in when they entered the league as objectively as you can, and I know that this is very hard for you. One was playing with a center that was about to become like a kid in a candy store with the lack of centers the late 90s and early 00s would bring, while the other one was stuck on a franchise whose best result ever was one or two eastern conference finals appearances and who won 17 games the season before LeBron's arrival, and are about to win around 17 games again this season as soon as LeBron left. See, that's the thing we don't have a luxury of. If Kobe would have been kept by the Hornets, then maybe we would have a better idea of the two players. But that isn't what happened. Maybe if Kobe is given the keys at 18 and told to do whatever he wanted, who knows what would have happened. He could be better, he could be worse, he could be in jail, he could have retired already, he could be TMac never makin it out the first round, he could have 10 titles, THERE'S NO WAY TO KNOW. I know this. He was placed on a team in 04 that was utter garbage. And in 4 years, they were in the finals. That's fairly close to getting drafted on a crap team and carrying them. Like I said already, Bron certainly could have done major work had he been drafted to LA with Shaq. I said they coulda won 1, 2, maybe even 3. Again, nobody knows, but you said clearly 6 "Imaginary rings" > 4 (now 5) real ones. One of the dumbest claims I have ever seen. What's funny to me is here I am arguing all this crap, and did you know that back in 2000 I was just happy the Lakers got the 1?I remember thinking, there, Shaq and Kobe are off the hook, now they can just play out there careers, everything else is house money. Then they won again, and then again, then it was over, then everyone tried to take those 3 and put them all on Shaq, then Kobe and Phil and Fish won again and I said, whew, now that's over, Kobe can just finish out his career, nobody can say nothing, then they won again.......I'M UP TO FIVE RINGS NOW, and still people like you discredit every single one of them like he's (let's see, one of your comparisons..........) Corey Brewer or something. Just a SG in the NBA, nothing more.The Cavs are not the Lakers, everybody knows that, everybody except for Cavs fans and Lebron fans that claimed he would own the world after every move they made. I been at this for years, I said for 3 years straight, the Cavs weren't contenders. I never wavered either. So you can claim all the fools that said they had the best supporting cast, that ain't on my record. No no no. I was upfront, Cavs won't win @#$% and I was right.
And you keep calling me a LeBron rider, but none of this compares to LeBron hating. Do I read LeBron's twitter? Do I scan practice, pre- and post-game interviews to find quotes about him? Or do I do that about Kobe for that matter, do I try to find some quote of his to start a thread about? No, because I know damn well that no matter how "dumb" LeBron is in the stuff he says, or how "intelligent" Kobe is, or how much of a **** MJ is to Chamillionaire and in his HOF speech, it won't change how good he is on the court. And really, the only reason you're doing this is because you're insecure and you somehow hope that pointing out something stupid LeBron tweeted will somehow help you in an argument about who's the better basketball player, which it won't. You haters better worry about the intelligence of someone who may actually affect your lives, like Sarah Palin instead of a basketball player's. I've seen you homerize Kobe in plenty of threads where the Kobe-LeBron discussion was brought up, before I even replied in that thread. Don't even try to convince me that you aren't a Kobe homer. I don't read Bron's twitter either. I don't scan interviews. What I do is frequent the NBA thread on a daily basis on NT. And I occasionally see stuff that he says, or does that is lame. And I talk about them. Put a lame quote out there by Baron Davis, and I'll laugh and make fun of that too. And I have never said you start threads about anybody, I know you don't, you should notice that I don't start a lot of threads about either of them either. If I see something interesting or stupid, or whatever, I'll go in and comment (much like this thread) and if someone starts up a convo, I'll go with it. Call out Dan Marino and I'll be there too.Call out Lamar Odom, whoever you want, if its my team and I have an opinion on it, I'll give it. I already said that. I don't care if that gets me the Kobe homer label, I've watched close to 1,000 games he's played in, I'm pretty well versed. Like I said, if people are in there talkin nothin, I leave, if they talk stupid, I speak up. Not hard to figure out.
And about scapgoating Gasol.. That's the whole problem. Somehow, blaming Kobe never is a part of the "heat of the moment". Other scapegoats are always looked for first.. Unless Kobe plays like complete garbage and you have NO excuse whatsoever.. And even then you sometimes try to put a positive spin by saying something like "At least he's the only trying to make something happen"... Or blame his poor performance on some dislocated finger, an on-off injury which mysteriously doesn't bother him on the nights when he's shooting well. I don't think you read the Laker thread enough, plenty of people get pissed at Kobe, but sure there are some that claim at least he's trying etc etc, I do the same during a given game if there's merit, he goes harder in those typical dead Laker games then most others. You tellin me you never seen Lamar sleepwalk? Or Bynum? Or Pau? Kobe and Fish give their best every game, but Fish isn't the same talent level obviously. For that, they get alot of credit (from me) even though most Laker fans hate Fisher. The real Laker fans, that get it, don't mind Fish, we know where he'll be when it matters. And you will take note right now, I have yet to bring up his injuries at all in this thread. (other then him being out in 04) You want to discredit a guy playing with different injuries, that's fine by me, I don't care. They get mentioned when he's being talked about, I am aware of that. If you want to shut that part down, I don't mind.
@ "But nobody with half a brain cares about a regular season "big" game." Spoken like a true two straight Christmas day games loser. One of the best examples of criteria customization on the part of Kobe extremists. Back when Shaq was up 4-3 in rings won, regular season performances was all that mattered to you. And one particular regular season game against the Raptors was used as propaganda to make all kinds of claims about Kobe, that he is better than MJ, that he is GOAT, etc. But after the Gasol trade when the Lakers started winning, it's amazing how all of a sudden regular season performances didn't matter. The same when it comes to your treatment of a discussion about stats. LeBron has better stats than Kobe, but you try to skip past this by claiming that stats don't tell the whole story, or that stats don't matter at all. Oh yeah. Stats don't matter all right.. Except on a night where there is "81" in the "pts" section next to "Bryant, Kobe" on a box score. Then you better believe regular season game stats matter.Laugh all you want, trust me, it's been my stance for YEARS. Ask any NBA fan that comes in here and has had any sort of discussion with me. Ask any of them. Go read the NBA thread the last 3 years, go read the Laker thread, you will see me with dozens of quotes of the regular season doesn't matter. I don't care if you have "other" Laker fans you want to use as an example, I'm not them, they don't speak for me. You are right, we lost on Christmas last year, badly..........that worked out how for the Cavs, and more importantly, the Lakers?Yeah, that's right, worked out great for us, so why the hell do you think the regular season matters again? And so you know, we won the Christmas before that. So that's two years, 1-1 on Christmas, won a title each year, so tell me the effect of those "big" regular seasons games on us. There is no effect, it's a regular season game. The Cavs stomped us, the Heat stomped us. Kinda hard to get up for a game in December when you really want to play games in June. But yeah, those games sure did matter to Bron. He had points to prove.I barely have said 5 words on 81. I could care less. The 62 actually was cooler to me since he outscored a whole team, but those were teams going nowhere. You go ahead and think those games mean a lot to me, fine by me, but as I said, check my numerous posts saying the regular season don't matter. There's a lot of them. If you mean in terms of overall career wise, numbers, categories, yeah that stuff matters at the end of a career, but in terms of during a specific season, do I want to win on Christmas, or do I want to win in June, hmmmmmmm geeeeee, lemmmmmme think........yeah. All the regular season stuff is to look back at what guys have done for thier careers. Big picture type stuff, not game by game by game. That stuff don't matter regardless of what you try to say for me.
Homer activity as well...Originally Posted by Mamba MVP
Clown activity in here...
Homer activity as well...Originally Posted by Mamba MVP
Clown activity in here...
Originally Posted by 703FlipFiend
Cats have been putting their hearts into these final papers the past two pages. Too much foolishness to read.