jbpkickz
Banned
- 3,665
- 548
- Joined
- Apr 12, 2012
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
my problem is mainly with the story.
1. Luke going off alone for a few months and becoming an adequate jedi out of the blue.
2. Randomly leaving Han with jaba for months, only to do some stupid plan that gets leia caught, instead of just having the rebel alliance go in and get 1 of the alliance heros
3.Ewoks
4. The Empire leaving the same weakspot in the death star and not having the majority of their troops on Endor
5. how the emperor was handled
etc.
I agree. Jedi was a weak followup to Empire and was a major letdown
Godfather was never a trilogy.
This. I never saw the 3rd one because everyone trashes it and I only think about the first 2 whenever Godfather is mentioned
When I think about trilogies it seems like the 2nd movie is usually the best and the 3rd can't live up to it....Godfather, Back to the Future, LOTR, Star Wars, Nolan's Batman, Beverly Hills Cop
damm you guys sound like a bunch of flamboyant fan boys
hating on Bruce Wayne game
really stars wars is gay mane.
But see there was a pit he fell in in the first one...and he climbed out in the last one. That smart.
Batman > everything
...
But for real, it'd be only be fair comparing this to the Spider-man trilogy, which is actually closer film for film than most people would wanna admit.
A lot of what knocks the first Spider-man down is the cgi and the Green Goblin's costume design. Outside of that, it's a great first movie. The Dark Knight has the Joker, but Spider-man 2 is still top 3 or 4 greatest comic book films. And even though it's crazy easy to point out emo Peter Parker dancing and how badly they casted Eddie Brock with Topher Grace (Maggie Gyllenhaal ), there's still enough there (Sandman, Uncle Ben, James Franco, the big construction site action scene and some of the purely venom scenes) that this is still a strong comic trilogy, and the closest one to Nolan's Batman imo.
And that's coming from someone who hates Spider-man 3.
I like the XMen series as a better comparison
I like the XMen series as a better comparison
X3 was a letdown.
X2 was so sick. That opening scene with Nightcrawler
Real Godfather fans know not to speak of part 3 as an actual part of the "series"
Let's forget that movie even existed..
the prestige is a very underrated movie
The Prestige is SUCH a dope movie.
QFT been meaning to watch this againThe Prestige is SUCH a dope movie.
QFT been meaning to watch this again
Spider-man 3 had elements and a casting that didn't work. X3 is an insult to film and by Brett Rattner.But see there was a pit he fell in in the first one...and he climbed out in the last one. That smart.
Batman > everything
...
But for real, it'd be only be fair comparing this to the Spider-man trilogy, which is actually closer film for film than most people would wanna admit.
A lot of what knocks the first Spider-man down is the cgi and the Green Goblin's costume design. Outside of that, it's a great first movie. The Dark Knight has the Joker, but Spider-man 2 is still top 3 or 4 greatest comic book films. And even though it's crazy easy to point out emo Peter Parker dancing and how badly they casted Eddie Brock with Topher Grace (Maggie Gyllenhaal ), there's still enough there (Sandman, Uncle Ben, James Franco, the big construction site action scene and some of the purely venom scenes) that this is still a strong comic trilogy, and the closest one to Nolan's Batman imo.
And that's coming from someone who hates Spider-man 3.
I like the XMen series as a better comparison