- 18,115
- 11,770
first of yall, you came incorrectly. you had absolutely no reason to assume anything based off what i said, much less anything to do with ****olding unless you just wanted to. you thought you were being funny, its ok just admit it. i plainly said since purnsley was introduced i didnt like him, so why would you think there was any other reason or association? maybe youre so focused on the ****old issue because it is personal to you.
as far as boss mentalities and purnsley's introduction, i was fine with the way chalky handled everything. I didnt say anything about that, i said purnsley was wrong in the way he came at chalky and he paid for it. obviously they werent going to kill him in the jail cell, but if that had been the last we'd seen of purnsley i would have been ok with that.
as far as capone, obviously chalky and capone had issues, but the point i was making there is that purnsley was not chalky, wasnt the boss, and shouldnt have been trying to rock the boat. chalky obviously did what a boss was supposed to and stepped to capone, once again no issue.
and when i said purnsley should play his role, what i meant was he should be challkys right hand man and not be mixing business and pleasure with new clientele.
and my point about insecurities was that you are displaying your own insecurities by trying to associate them with me and anything i said.
It's not a point your making, you're just saying things to say them. Like I said " As for insecurities, I don't know what the **** you're talking about but I'm sure you got some weak *** reasoning for that too." i.e. what insecurities? Seems you're just trying to slip in slights and insults based off of some piss poor psychoanalyzing.
