- 199
- 11
- Joined
- May 6, 2008
Dude neither of the alternative energy bills passed.... that's sorta wack imo. Im sure there was stuff wrong with it, but damn, it wasnt even close.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
You have no idea the severity of a Constitutional Amendment then if you think it will be overturned or any lawsuits will be successful. Tell me,on what grounds can the city of SF sue?Originally Posted by ReliantJ
It will be overturned or featured in the next ballot. As if 52% was enough for this to pass.
News is saying SF is starting on the lawsuit
Hell yeah!!! High speed bullet train FTW!!Originally Posted by ReliantJ
It will be overturned or featured in the next ballot. As if 52% was enough for this to pass.
News is saying SF is starting on the lawsuit
High Speed Rail
no it isnt. those energy bills were all for special interest masked as something to help the environment.Originally Posted by ProducedByTheJuice
Dude neither of the alternative energy bills passed.... that's sorta wack imo. Im sure there was stuff wrong with it, but damn, it wasnt even close.
OOOOO I'll be right back.Originally Posted by Lightweight Champion
Stop setting yourself up for these L's man.
Ever heard the story of The Good Samaritan? I mean, since you read the Bible and all I'm pretty sure you've heard, correct?
Well do you know the reason why Samaritans were considered to be bad? Why the countries around them frowned upon them? It's because back during those days inter-racial relationships, much less marriages, were considered to be against the will of God. People back then believed that those who weren't full blooded in one ethnicity were considered to be not of God's people. And the only place that tolerated inter-racial relationships at that time? Samaria. Yes, the same Samaria where the Samaritan passed and helped the injured man even though everyone else who passed him by did just that, pass him by. Without offering a helping hand.
And here we are centuries later and all of a sudden inter-racial marriages aren't frowned upon by the church anymore, they're widely accepted even though back in the day, it was against the word of God.
Try again.
Exodus 34:10-16:
"And he said, Behold, I make a covenant: before all thy people I will do marvels ... behold, I drive out before thee the Amorite, and the Canaanite, and the Hittite, and the Perizzite, and the Hivite, and the Jebusite. Take heed to thyself, lest thou make a covenant with the inhabitants of the land whither thou goest, lest it be for a snare in the midst of thee: But ye shall destroy their altars, break their images, and cut down their groves: For thou shalt worship no other god: for the LORD, whose name is Jealous, is a jealous God; Lest thou make a covenant with the inhabitants of the land, and they go a whoring after their gods, and do sacrifice unto their gods, and one call thee, and thou eat of his sacrifice; And thou take of their daughters unto thy sons, and their daughters go a whoring after their gods, and make thy sons go a whoring after their gods."
In this scripture God didn't want the Israelites to marry people from the nations around them. Not because of race though.
"Be ye not unequally yoked together with unbelievers ...",
He wassn't against Black/White or Asian/Black. He didin't want his true believers to get mixed up with the unbelievers.
"he shall be as one that is born in the land .... One law shall be to him that is home born and unto the stranger that sojourneth among you"
See how would Black man turn to a White one? He can't. But a non believer can turn into a believer.
Now people can knock the bible and call it wise tells, man made or old school. But boy is it on point with keeping Gods people safe. Now someone will come ineventually and say "for you to quote the bible I bet you don't follow everything it says" They would be right. But I still try though. I try togrow everyday.
so i guess you wouldnt mind somebody taking away your rights?Originally Posted by KB8sandiego
Yes on 8!
Originally Posted by ReliantJ
^Obama is for gay rights.
Anyways SF is planning to sue because they are arguing it is taking away rights which could open up the door for more of these amendments.
52% to 48% sucks.
Originally Posted by ourtran
i like how you brought the bible into this...so the bible also says woman was created out of man right? so that would mean woman are not equal to man? so why not take away a womans right to vote?
Why because your views aren't his views.Originally Posted by ReliantJ
Originally Posted by theyhatinonme
8 passedObama wonwhat a great day for America. I couldn't ask for much more.
Oxymoron.
Originally Posted by ReliantJ
Originally Posted by theyhatinonme
8 passedObama wonwhat a great day for America. I couldn't ask for much more.
Oxymoron.