- 4,866
- 1,196
- Joined
- Dec 24, 2011
Thats a little more than $4 bucks a month .
God yall some broke boys
God yall some broke boys
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Would you like me to stop replying to people directing insults, vitriol and general negativity?Wow. Dude is on the defensive like his life depended on it.
You are trolling, which is why I called you that....and I was called a troll...
Would you like me to stop replying to people directing insults, vitriol and general negativity?
I mean, I mention that I'm 'struggling' to garner support, someone tries to make a joke out of it. Hey that's cool, say what you want, but why am I being made to look like the bad guy if I retort?
I don't know, just seems like people who have nothing to add join the hive mind in order to get a rise.
...and I was called a troll...
that little rant reminded me on how little i miss da video game world...
Something more than a few people need to see.
It's not about the money, it's about the principle.You just cheap bruh
It's not about the money.You just cheap bruh
If what I said was positive or relevant, all I needed to hear. At least people can hear the message.You were called a troll because of all the responses you gave but yes you can reply but in a less defensive way. And yes, you can ignore some of the obvious posts that is trying to get a rise out of you as well, no need to reply to each and everyone of them, especially the way you do it. That is how you move the thread in a positive way and get your message across better. This is an online forum and 100 people could just create a new account and troll you to death, just got to ignore and move on. People will response better to enthusiasm instead of defensive response.
I admit you posted some positive info relevant to your cause/message but you are just going about it the wrong way with your replies.
A troll is someone who ignores logical points, attacks people, and pretends to be oblivious of his trolling.If what I said was positive or relevant, all I needed to hear. At least people can hear the message.
Also I think you guys don't know what a troll is, and only use it because it's a buzzword, srsly.
Your reasoning is flawed.No, it's not.
I've already posted some reasons why it's not but you just ignored it.
Sony claims to be improving it's online network, which is why its customers have to pay for psn.
Also other ppl have posted other reasons like psn + gives you a lot of bang for your buck.
Your definition is cute, but sorry:A troll is someone who ignores logical points, attacks people, and pretends to be oblivious of his trolling.
You've exhibited all of these traits.
Well then.baloney.
It's not about the money.You just cheap bruh
It is anti consumer to the point of being almost as bad as DRM. I mean, are you OK with a company artificially halving the value of something you purchased for full value?
Why are people ignoring this point?
Even if it were about the money, why are you people content to let this slide, and take advantage of the people who aren't as well off as you (those who "aren't cheap")? Seeing the things I've seen on this site, I will conclude that many of us are from poorer families and can understand how it used to be when all you could afford was the console and MAYBE a game. Through that lens, why are we sweeping this under the rug? There are still many people like that, and they don't have anyone looking out for them...
I can afford the money. I posted a link showing that I was an Xbox gamer in the beginning, and yeah I paid Xbox live. I could probably pay 4 subscriptions and it not affect my bottom line. It's about principle here. We need to stand up to these companies and not let them take advantage of us ALL THE TIME. It's a shameless cash grab by Sony, and we shouldn't stand for it.
This kind of reasoning I seriously hate.As long as Sony uses the money to better the online experience, I don't see the problem. Gamers were lucky Sony allowed free online multiplayer to go on for all of last generation.
Suck it up. I really don't think it's that big of an issue of principle.
This kind of reasoning I seriously hate.As long as Sony uses the money to better the online experience, I don't see the problem. Gamers were lucky Sony allowed free online multiplayer to go on for all of last generation.
Suck it up. I really don't think it's that big of an issue of principle.
So, we were LUCKY Sony decided to...go par for the course?
Online gaming being free IS THE NORM. Microsoft was previously the absolute only company charging a premium for it.
Also I should suck it up?
You mind answering a question people keep ignoring?
Are you OK with not receiving the full value of an item you've already paid for, unless you pay again?
This kind of reasoning I seriously hate.As long as Sony uses the money to better the online experience, I don't see the problem. Gamers were lucky Sony allowed free online multiplayer to go on for all of last generation.
Suck it up. I really don't think it's that big of an issue of principle.
So, we were LUCKY Sony decided to...go par for the course?
Online gaming being free IS THE NORM. Microsoft was previously the absolute only company charging a premium for it.
Also I should suck it up?
You mind answering a question people keep ignoring?
Are you OK with not receiving the full value of an item you've already paid for, unless you pay again?