CEO Tells Workers He Will Fire Them If Obama Is Reelected and Raises His Taxes Vol. Class Warfare/V

9,537
2,691
Joined
Mar 13, 2008
David Siegel, the owner of Westgate Resorts, sent a surprising email to his employees Monday.

David SiegelIt said that if President Barack Obama wins re-election and raises Siegel's taxes, he will have to lay off workers and downsize his company - or even shut it down.

"If any new taxes are levied on me, or my company, as our current President plans, I will have no choice but to reduce the size of this company," he wrote. "Rather than grow this company I will be forced to cut back. This means fewer jobs, less benefits and certainly less opportunity for everyone."

In a version of Romney's "47 percent" remarks, Siegel added that "people like me who made all the right decisions and invested in themselves are being forced to bail out all the people who didn't. The people that overspent their paychecks suddenly feel entitled to the same luxuries that I earned and sacrificed 42 years of my life for."

The points are ones that have often been made during this election. But what makes the letter surprising is the source.


David Siegel is the man who, together with his wife, Jackie, built the largest new house in America, known as "Versailles." His story first appeared in my book, "The High-Beta Rich." It then made it to the big screen with documentary film "The Queen of Versailles."

They became symbols of outsized spending, debt and real estate in America.

But when the company started buckling under $1 billion in debt during the crisis, the Siegels' home went into foreclosure and was put up for sale. They cut back on the jet, took the kids out of private school and gave up some of their staff.

So why is David Siegel - a man who defined excess and debt in the 2000s - now saying that debt and spending are ruining the country?

I asked David during a phone interview last night, and he told me that this was about his workers, not himself. He said his own finances have vastly improved. He has paid off all of his major lenders. "I have enough money for the rest of my life and enough to leave a good inheritance for our kids." He said the loan for Versailles is paid off and he's resuming construction on the home.

"The elevators are going in and they're preparing to put in the marble."

The deal with Versailles' lenders, he went on, worked out "better than I imagined," since he was allowed to go nine months without making any interest payments on the loan. Jackie has several offers for a new reality TV show "which we're in the process of ranking and evaluating," Siegel said.

He has learned his own painful lesson from the debt crunch. "We cut back, we're lean and mean. That's what the rest of the country has to do."

Siegel said he's not acting out of self interest, but for the interest of his workers. While Westgate has never been more profitable, the company has 5,000 fewer workers than in 2007.

He said that if Obama is re-elected and imposes Obamacare and higher taxes, he may just have to let more of his remaining 7,000 workers go. He said he might even shut down the company.

"The combination of Obamacare and taxes would be a disaster," he said." I would probably just call it a day and that would be a disaster."

Siegel stressed that he wasn't out to intimidate his workers into voting for Romney. "I can't tell anyone to vote," he said. But he wants to make sure his workers made an informed choice. "I want my employees to be educated on what could happen to their future if the wrong person is elected."

Below is the full email that Siegel sent to his employees Monday. (Siegel admitted to me that he used a similar email circulating on the web as "the basis" of his own email).

Subject: Message from David Siegel

Date:Mon, 08 Oct 2012 13:58:05 -0400 (EDT)

From: [David Siegel]

To: [All employees]

To All My Valued Employees,

As most of you know our company, Westgate Resorts, has continued to succeed in spite of a very dismal economy. There is no question that the economy has changed for the worse and we have not seen any improvement over the past four years. In spite of all of the challenges we have faced, the good news is this: The economy doesn't currently pose a threat to your job. What does threaten your job however, is another 4 years of the same Presidential administration. Of course, as your employer, I can't tell you whom to vote for, and I certainly wouldn't interfere with your right to vote for whomever you choose. In fact, I encourage you to vote for whomever you think will serve your interests the best.

[More From CNBC: The Rich Prefer Good Weather Over Low Taxes]

However, let me share a few facts that might help you decide what is in your best interest.The current administration and members of the press have perpetuated an environment that casts employers against employees. They want you to believe that we live in a class system where the rich get richer, the poor get poorer. They label us the "1%" and imply that we are somehow immune to the challenges that face our country. This could not be further from the truth. Sure, you may have heard about the big home that I'm building. I'm sure many people think that I live a privileged life. However, what you don't see or hear is the true story behind any success that I have achieved.

I started this company over 42 years ago. At that time, I lived in a very modest home. I converted my garage into an office so I could put forth 100% effort into building a company, which by the way, would eventually employ you. We didn't eat in fancy restaurants or take expensive vacations because every dollar I made went back into this company. I drove an old used car, and often times, I stayed home on weekends, while my friends went out drinking and partying. In fact, I was married to my business - hard work, discipline, and sacrifice. Meanwhile, many of my friends got regular jobs. They worked 40 hours a week and made a nice income, and they spent every dime they earned. They drove flashy cars and lived in expensive homes and wore fancy designer clothes. My friends refinanced their mortgages and lived a life of luxury. I, however, did not. I put my time, my money, and my life into this business --with a vision that eventually, some day, I too, will be able to afford to buy whatever I wanted. Even to this day, every dime I earn goes back into this company. Over the past four years I have had to stop building my dream house, cut back on all of my expenses, and take my kids out of private schools simply to keep this company strong and to keep you employed.

Just think about this - most of you arrive at work in the morning and leave that afternoon and the rest of your time is yours to do as you please. But not me- there is no "off" button for me. When you leave the office, you are done and you have a weekend all to yourself. I unfortunately do not have that freedom. I eat, live, and breathe this company every minute of the day, every day of the week. There is no rest. There is no weekend. There is no happy hour. I know many of you work hard and do a great job, but I'm the one who has to sign every check, pay every expense, and make sure that this company continues to succeed. Unfortunately, what most people see is the nice house and the lavish lifestyle. What the press certainly does not want you to see, is the true story of the hard work and sacrifices I've made.

Now, the economy is falling apart and people like me who made all the right decisions and invested in themselves are being forced to bail out all the people who didn't. The people that overspent their paychecks suddenly feel entitled to the same luxuries that I earned and sacrificed 42 years of my life for. Yes, business ownership has its benefits, but the price I've paid is steep and not without wounds. Unfortunately, the costs of running a business have gotten out of control, and let me tell you why: We are being taxed to death and the government thinks we don't pay enough. We pay state taxes, federal taxes, property taxes, sales and use taxes, payroll taxes, workers compensation taxes and unemployment taxes. I even have to hire an entire department to manage all these taxes. The question I have is this: Who is really stimulating the economy? Is it the Government that wants to take money from those who have earned it and give it to those who have not, or is it people like me who built a company out of his garage and directly employs over 7000 people and hosts over 3 million people per year with a great vacation?

Obviously, our present government believes that taking my money is the right economic stimulus for this country. The fact is, if I deducted 50 percent of your paycheck you'd quit and you wouldn't work here. I mean, why should you? Who wants to get rewarded only 50 percent of their hard work? Well, that's what happens to me.

Here is what most people don't understand and the press and our Government has chosen to ignore - to stimulate the economy you need to stimulate what runs the economy. Instead of raising my taxes and depositing that money into the Washington black-hole, let me spend it on growing the company, hire more employees, and generate substantial economic growth. My employees will enjoy the wealth of that tax cut in the form of promotions and better salaries. But that is not what our current Government wants you to believe. They want you to believe that it somehow makes sense to take more from those who create wealth and give it to those who do not, and somehow our economy will improve. They don't want you to know that the "1%", as they like to label us, pay more than 31% of all the taxes in this country. Thomas Jefferson, the author of our great Constitution, once said, "democracy" will cease to exist when you take away from those who are willing to work and give to those who would not."

[More From CNBC: The Most Expensive Apartments in New York City]


Business is at the heart of America and always has been. To restart it, you must stimulate business, not kill it. However, the power brokers in Washington believe redistributing wealth is the essential driver of the American economic engine. Nothing could be further from the truth and this is the type of change they want.

So where am I going with all this? It's quite simple. If any new taxes are levied on me, or my company, as our current President plans, I will have no choice but to reduce the size of this company. Rather than grow this company I will be forced to cut back. This means fewer jobs, less benefits and certainly less opportunity for everyone.

So, when you make your decision to vote, ask yourself, which candidate understands the economics of business ownership and who doesn't? Whose policies will endanger your job? Answer those questions and you should know who might be the one capable of protecting and saving your job. While the media wants to tell you to believe the "1 percenters" are bad, I'm telling you they are not. They create most of the jobs. If you lose your job, it won't be at the hands of the "1%"; it will be at the hands of a political hurricane that swept through this country.

You see, I can no longer support a system that penalizes the productive and gives to the unproductive. My motivation to work and to provide jobs will be destroyed, and with it, so will your opportunities. If that happens, you can find me in the Caribbean sitting on the beach, under a palm tree, retired, and with no employees to worry about.

Signed, your boss,

David Siegel

http://finance.yahoo.com/news/ceo-workers-youll-likely-fired-131640914.html
 
Last edited:
Clowns showing their *** and will continue to. I predict a real class warfare in this country within the next few years.
 
What a shocker. If Romney wins and he gets tax breaks he will pocket the money, not hire dozens of more people.

Bunch of con men. And im starting to think Romney will win.
 
I read this earlier on MSNBC, I can understand him having to lay off the workers due to his business have to pay more taxes ok whatever but all the talking down on others saying people need to cutback etc isn't even necessary.

People like this piss me off they think since they experienced some success they can look down on people who aren't as privileged on them. I'm sure he already knows Obama is going to get re-elected and is looking for an excuse to lay off even more people than what he already has :smh:
 
mean.gif
 
I read this earlier on MSNBC, I can understand him having to lay off the workers due to his business have to pay more taxes ok whatever but all the talking down on others saying people need to cutback etc isn't even necessary.
People like this piss me off they think since they experienced some success they can look down on people who aren't as privileged on them. I'm sure he already knows Obama is going to get re-elected and is looking for an excuse to lay off even more people than what he already has :smh:

I don't understand him having to lay off the workers. Federal income taxes are below the line taxes so they aren't paid until after workers are paid. Raising federal income taxes does not reduce the amount of money available to pay workers. Workers are paid before federal income taxes. If there are no profits, no federal income tax is paid.

I haven't researched Obamacare much but we end up paying for healthcare one way or another. Whether it's visits to the doctor or the ER.
 
Check out this guy's story and his own balance sheet.

Also, if he doesn't want to continue to run his extremely profitable business, I'll happily take over.
 
Wow, that restaurant article reminds me of how business in 3rd world countries work. The companies in the Philippines enlist part-time workers. If part time workers work 40 hours a week for a company in the Philippines for at least X months, they become full time workers under the law. If they are full time workers, they get benefits from the company. Thus, the company will terminate these workers at X-1 month; they re-hire them afterwards as part-time workers again. The cycle continues.

The taxes in the states are stupid low (even with the clinton-era rates). If your business can't make money because you're taxed too much, your business fails and someone takes your spot.

The problem is how the government spends this public money (useless wars, aid to foreign countries like Israel etc.). Then again, this is a problem for all nations with tax payers.
 
 
When companies do this, you end up with workers that don't care about their jobs and the food service declines, then people will stop going to their restaurants.

Yes, I'm certain people go to the Olive Garden for the ambiance and exceptional service.
 
Why does this sound so familiar?




I like how he tells his employees how he doesn't have the "freedom" to go home and relax.

then have the nerve to say this



Card carrying member of the "Fix the country, just don't do it at my expense" Club.
 
I read this earlier on MSNBC, I can understand him having to lay off the workers due to his business have to pay more taxes ok whatever but all the talking down on others saying people need to cutback etc isn't even necessary.
People like this piss me off they think since they experienced some success they can look down on people who aren't as privileged on them. I'm sure he already knows Obama is going to get re-elected and is looking for an excuse to lay off even more people than what he already has
mean.gif
I don't understand him having to lay off the workers. Federal income taxes are below the line taxes so they aren't paid until after workers are paid. Raising federal income taxes does not reduce the amount of money available to pay workers. Workers are paid before federal income taxes. If there are no profits, no federal income tax is paid.

I haven't researched Obamacare much but we end up paying for healthcare one way or another. Whether it's visits to the doctor or the ER.
The problem is that with the millions in additional money they are required to pay, they were going to build additional restaurants with it. The problem here is that they are requiring people to do something whether they want to or not.

Here's an interview with the CEO of Hardees/Carl's Jr.

http://www.businessweek.com/news/2012-09-21/hardee-s-owner-ceo-says-2012-ipo-unlikely-as-costs-rise

CKE Inc. (CK), owner of the Hardee’s and Carl’s Jr. fast-food chains, plans to delay an initial public offering until after the presidential election as rising health- care and commodity costs deter investors.

An IPO is “unlikely in 2012,” Chief Executive Officer Andrew Puzder said yesterday in a telephone interview. During the company’s August roadshow with investors, “there was concern about our costs going up and our inability to increase prices,” he said.

People were saying, ‘How are you going to deal with the increased costs of Obamacare at the same time you’re dealing with the increased cost of commodities and the economy kind of in the ditch?’” Puzder said. The company has answers, including selling less-expensive meats, such as turkey, and hiring more part-time workers to cut health-care expenses, he said.

CKE, based in Carpinteria, California, said in a U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission filing in August that it was delaying its public offering due to market conditions. The company had earlier this year filed for an IPO to sell about 13.3 million shares priced at $14 to $16 each on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol CK.

Other restaurant operators recently have cited uncertainty around costs associated with President Barack Obama’s health- care overhaul. McDonald’s Corp. (MCD) in July said additional health- care costs may be $10,000 to $30,000 for each of its 14,000 U.S. stores. Jamie Richardson, vice president of White Castle System Inc., said in July that it will be hard to predict health-care expenses.
[h2]Costs Double[/h2]
With Obama’s Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, health-care costs for CKE would likely more than double to about $30 million a year, Puzder said. The hamburger seller probably would decrease capital spending and raise menu prices because of the higher expenses, he said.

CKE’s revenue rose 3 percent to $308.6 million in the three months ended Aug. 13, while net income was $1.77 million, compared with a net loss of $2.23 million a year earlier, the company said in a statement Sept. 18. It has recently attempted to draw customers with a $6 Memphis BBQ burger topped with fried onions.

Apollo Global Management LLC (APO), based in New York, took CKE private in 2010 for about $1.01 billion. There are about 3,279 Hardee’s and Carl’s Jr. locations, of which 73 percent are franchised.
 
Back
Top Bottom