jumpmanfromdabay
Banned
- 25,730
- 2,900
Congrats on Keeping the Team in Sac. Now y'all need to get a new arena
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Hansen/Ballmer/Nordstrom and Vivek/Mastrov/Jacobs buyer groups were contingent on having a viable term sheet with their respective cities.Congrats on Keeping the Team in Sac. Now y'all need to get a new arena
That's what I'm saying I couldn't hear what was going on but he looked kinda madNews about what?
I actually thought he just looked tired as hell, dude has been in San Antonio, Dallas, and OKC in the last 24 hoursThat's what I'm saying I couldn't hear what was going on but he looked kinda madNews about what?
To answer your first question, thats not entirely true. But yes, the NBA wants a public-private partnership when building an arena. Which quite frankly, might have started when the NBA moved the Sonics to Seattle.Is it true that the reason NBA owners balked at the relocation vote is because the Seattle group was willing to foot the entire bill on the new Seattle arena while majority league owners want stadiums built through majority taxpayer money?
If Sacramento does keep the team who's gonna pay for that new arena?
Probably all of it.... I wonder what the existing businesses will do.How much of Downtown Plaza is getting knocked out for the new arena? It it just going to be Macys, forever 21, and the food court left standing?
Pretty sure macys is a goner. It's not worth keeping there anyways. Perhaps it'll be moved to another location.
can somebody tell me why they dont want the seattle group footing the bill and want tax payers to do it................Is it true that the reason NBA owners balked at the relocation vote is because the Seattle group was willing to foot the entire bill on the new Seattle arena while majority league owners want stadiums built through majority taxpayer money?
If Sacramento does keep the team who's gonna pay for that new arena?
Because unlike the Seattle group, the majority of owners of the league (mainly small market franchises) don't have the ability to build and fund an arena on their own.can somebody tell me why they dont want the seattle group footing the bill and want tax payers to do it................Is it true that the reason NBA owners balked at the relocation vote is because the Seattle group was willing to foot the entire bill on the new Seattle arena while majority league owners want stadiums built through majority taxpayer money?
If Sacramento does keep the team who's gonna pay for that new arena?