- 4,104
- 10
- Joined
- Sep 19, 2006
Capitalistic comunism is next huh. Im starting to wounder if I should just go to madigascar.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
It's been this way for a while. An example of such puppetry:Originally Posted by SenatorJeffSmith
Much more evidence litters the battlefield:
Wall Street wealth now calls the shots in Congress, the White House
Im not sure if you intended what appears to be a simple statement to be so brilliant and actually hold deeper meaning. If so, kudos to you sir. Not being the least bit sarcastic, either.Originally Posted by HueyP in LouieV
America is built on a faulty foundation, collapse is inevitable.
Originally Posted by DwyaneWadeOG
[h1]The Default Power[/h1]
The False Prophecy of America's Decline
Summary --
Since the United States first became a global superpower, it has been fashionable to speak of its decline. But in today's world, the United States' economic and military strength, along with the attractiveness of its ideals, will ensure its power for a long time to come.
read it if you want. good read as i felt that the "united states was doomed" all last year until i read this article.
http://www.foreignaffairs...-joffe/the-default-power
some excerpts:
-United States has a larger economy than the next 4 countries combined
-The United States has a navy larger than the next 17 navys
yes i realize that these are not indicators of a moral or correct nation however they are statistics that make you realize why we are called the worlds only superpower.
Originally Posted by SunDOOBIE
I am all for Capitalism to end.
No more Niketalk/video games/movies/internet/Jordans/NBA/NFL/MLB/BCS standings/Porn, etc... I hope at that point we'll have nuclear wars and a good 80-90% of the world's population will die. Strongest will survive and I have been stocking up on guns/ammo/rations for a reason!!!!
Originally Posted by dashoekid21
ok first y2k
then 666
2012
now this!!!!!
cmon it seems like when every doomsday prediction comes close to its date it turns out to be false...
This.Originally Posted by HueyP in LouieV
Aren't you a little to old to be constantly playing this juvenile blame game?Originally Posted by HOVKid
This is way bigger than Obama and you know it.
Yup, which is good in so many ways due to the current situation this country is inOriginally Posted by maxb7ty
Someone would have to refresh my memory on Marx's theory but isn't capitalism supposed to transition to socialism?
bboy1827 wrote:
I take it none of you have read any Marx, Rawls or Schweickart; just by the tittle of this post I can tell most of you aren't versed in the socio-political writtings of these fellows that have been saying capitialism is long overdue for a change. Personally I can't wait hopefully everything will go like Schweickart predicted.
I have read a lot from Marx, some from the other two. Remember that Marx understood how important a price system was for the well being of society. He dislikedprivate ownership and profits but you need some degree of private property for prices to even matter and profits and losses or some other incentives to makepeople respond to the information contained in a price system. Without private property and incentives for economizing on resources, the price system is notable to function and without functioning price system, that economy will fail because even if people are committed to work hard and try to serve the state runeconomy (either out of patriotism or fear of punishment), without prices there will be massive inefficiencies.
The fact that Soviet producers consistently made too much of some things and too little of others is a major reason why the USSR had such a low standard ofliving despite churning out a fairly large GDP per capita. It also had to use a lot more material and capital to make something because the bureaucrats who ranthe factories would be compensated for the size of the operation and not for it efficiency. In a profit and loss capitalist system, owners generally do notwant to have valuable machinery sitting and rusting outdoors or having to use twice as much electricity, steel or cement to make the same amount of output asother factories. While there are bad social outcomes that comes from a profit and lose system, they can be nullified or at least cushioned through socialservices for low paid or displaced worker.
In the Rawlsian way of thinking, I would still design my society as a Capitalist one for three reasons. One is that workers in communist societies were treatedjust as poorly as a worker in capitalist society and in many cases, they were treated much worse. My second reason is that under a Capitalist system, ordinarypeople even poor people have goods that are almost non existent in countries that are hostile to markets. By the 1980's things like blue jeans,refrigerators and televisions were available to most working class people the Capitalist countries but were luxuries in the USSR, the wealthiest communistcountry in history. My third reason is that because of the wealth created in capitalist economies, there is enough wealth to fund various social insurance andsocial services.