*Edit Title* Louisiana what’s going on - 1 & 3 GET TESTED!

[jape]

i think dude is a transporter for the hospital

and to say all you need to do is retain information is just ridiculous.
i actually can't think of one profession where that's all you need to do.

 

[alchemist iq]

What about Astronauts?

What is it that they have to do?

Also economists?
Bee Keepers?


Just read and recall too?

And throw out critical thinking and independent thinking out the window while we’re at it.

 

[nawghtyhare]

What about Astronauts?

What is it that they have to do?

Also economists?
Bee Keepers?


Just read and recall too?

Basically
Now who really impressed me
If the first doctor
He had no book
He had to wing it

 

[jape]

A1

 

[alchemist iq]

i think dude is a transporter for the hospital

and to say all you need to do is retain information is just ridiculous.
i actually can't think of one profession where that's all you need to do.

Yeah no need to do a clinical roatation, just throw recently graduated pre-meds into the fire and hope for the best with nawghtyhare doctor in da box medical degree.

As seen on Tv.

 

[nawghtyhare]

i think dude is a transporter for the hospital

and to say all you need to do is retain information is just ridiculous.
i actually can't think of one profession where that's all you need to do.

Nah no transporter
Though looking at my union wage structure
They make a nice lil amount
I make a liiiiiiiiiiiil under double there starting pay

 

[DCAllAfrican]

Basically
Now who really impressed me
If the first doctor
He had no book
He had to wing it

What about NBA GMs.

All they need to do is study the CBA right? And memorize it and they are straight?

 

[nawghtyhare]

And throw out critical thinking and independent thinking out the window while we’re at it.

Bruh some doctors ain’t as critical or independent thinking as u may think
Trust me

 

[nawghtyhare]

Yeah no need to do a clinical roatation, just throw recently graduated pre-meds into the fire and hope for the best with nawghtyhare doctor in da box medical degree.

As seen on Tv.

 

[ahat]

You and your wife make a combined 150k+ yet you still out here stealing toilet paper from Jack in the Box?

What the hell man

 

[nawghtyhare]

You and your wife make a combined 150k+ yet you still out here stealing toilet from Jack in the Box?

What the hell man

I didn’t do that
But I like how u like to post this
In almost every thread
Where u disagree with me
Lightweight lame
I have no problem admitting my scumbag behavior
Or my cheap behavior
And this ain’t one of em
Now the napkins
In the napkin holders on the tables
Oh yeah I’m taking them
All day long and leaving em in my cars
Glove compartment

 

[alchemist iq]

You and your wife make a combined 150k+ yet you still out here stealing toilet from Jack in the Box?

What the hell man

That’s how you stay rich.

 

[nawghtyhare]

That’s how you stay rich.

I ain’t rich
Not at all

 

[ahat]

I didn’t do that
But I like how u like to post this
In almost every thread
Where u disagree with me
Lightweight lame
I have no problem admitting my scumbag behavior
Or my cheap behavior
And this ain’t one of em
Now the napkins
In the napkin holders on the tables
Oh yeah I’m taking them
All day long and leaving em in my cars
Glove compartment

Sure you don't, scumbaghare

 

[americangenius]

Bruh some doctors ain’t as critical or independent thinking as u may think
Trust me

Agree that many aren't and are no better than or worse than Web MD with the power to prescribe, however experienced doctors can detect diseases much earlier and be the difference maker.

 

[nawghtyhare]

Agree that many aren't and are no better than or worse than Web MD with the power to prescribe, however experienced doctors can detect diseases much earlier and be the difference maker.

Actually they know the symptoms
Which can vary or be similar to other diseases
They send u to get lab work
And that’s where they detect the diseases
Other than that doctors don’t know
What u got until them labs come back

 

[nawghtyhare]

Sure you don't, scumbaghare

Nawghtybarb was more creative imo
Who came up with that
Was that u RustyShackleford

 

[americangenius]

Actually they know the symptoms
Which can vary or be similar to other diseases
They send u to get lab work
And that’s where they detect the diseases
Other than that doctors don’t know
What u got until them labs come back

Some diseases don't appear in standard blood work until it's too late, but show physical signs/other symptoms that seem harmless. It's not all cut and dry.

There are also false positives/negatives. The problem is most doctors truly don't give a damn, do standard blood work prescribe trash and keep it moving.

 

[nawghtyhare]

Some diseases don't appear in standard blood work until it's too late, but show physical signs/other symptoms that seem harmless. It's not all cut and dry.

There are also false positives/negatives. The problem is most doctors truly don't give a damn, do standard blood work prescribe trash and keep it moving.

all facts

 

[RustyShackleford]

Nawghtybarb was more creative imo
Who came up with that
Was that u RustyShackleford

Yeah it was me.

Your caping for Nicki is one of the highlights of the music section.

 

[C.Magneto]

In case anyone needs a quick 20 racks. Offers been on the table since 2002.

THE HUW CHRISTIE MEMORIAL PRIZE
$20,000 Reward for 'HIV' Offered by Alexander Russell


April 2002


"...infectious units, after all, are the only clinically relevant criteria for a viral pathogen."
-- Peter Duesberg and Harvey Bialy (Nature, 375, 1995, p. 197)

"You measure democracy by the freedom it gives its dissidents, not the freedom it gives its assimilated conformists."
-- Abbie Hoffman

I am offering £10,000 Reward for the first person who can prove that 'HIV' exists. (see full details below).

Hans Gelderblom of Berlin's Robert Koch Institute co-authored the first paper in Virology, March 1997, showing 'purified HIV' to be 'purified microvesicles'. What was assumed to be 'purified HIV' was in fact "an excess of vesicles" - particles of cellular proteins. The hypothetical 'HIV' is in fact a collection of endogenous microvesicles and cellular proteins (which also never seem to form particles - so how can they be infectious)? Cell-free viral 'HIV' particles have never ever been visualised in any freshly donated bodily fluid including semen, blood, etc. 'HIV' has never ever proven to be a sexually transmitted retrovirus.

The key fact to remember is that cell-free infectious 'HIV' viral particles have never, repeat never, been recovered from fresh donor semen. It is homophobic nonsense to say 'HIV' is sexually transmitted via anal sex as well as scientifically totally unproven. 'HIV' is not an STD.

The rules demonstrating the existence of 'HIV' (and retroviruses in general) were never adhered to by those who devised them nor were they ever validated. No particle of 'HIV' has ever been obtained pure, free of contaminants; nor has a complete piece of 'HIV RNA' (or the transcribed DNA) ever been proved to exist.

The immunological-stressors of the 'gay life style' (recreational drug use, antibiotics, flu jabs, alcoholism, untreated STDs, etc) can make many gay men test 'HIV' positive. Gay men are testing 'HIV' positive not because of the non-existent 'HIV' but because of over 70 conditions which make the test run 'positive'. All 'HIV' testing kits come with the warning that they must not and cannot be used as diagnostic tools to prove 'HIV' infection.

So confident am I that no such electron-micrograph evidence for the existence of 'HIV' can be produced by adhering strictly to the Etienne de Harven methodology, I am prepared to offer the sum of £10,000 to the first person to submit just such a micrograph, prepared under stringent laboratory conditions. I do not want 'markers' for 'viral activity' which are at very best, inaccurate. I want visual evidence of myriad active, infectious viral particles, clearly morphologically defined recovered from a fresh sample of bodily fluid, unadulterated with any other kinds of cells: i.e: CEM,H9 cancer cells. As Peter Duesberg and Harvey Bialy stated in Nature: "...infectious units, after all, are the only clinically relevant criteria for a viral pathogen." (Nature, 375, 1995, p. 197) Once again, to paraphrase Peter Duesberg, an alleged 'virus' which is not doing anything cannot be 'causing' anything.

The rules for attempting to isolate the putative 'HIV' via the Etienne de Harven methodology are:

1. Only plasma centrifuged from fresh whole blood may be used in the experiment. No material derived from cultured cells will be considered, to rule out 'viral particles' which may be merely cultural artefacts.

2. The donor blood/plasma must be taken from a person/persons with a recent 'high-viral load' test result, and evidence for the date and result of the test (the number of 'HIV'- RNA's alleged) must be submitted, obviously with the name of the person/persons deleted to preserve donor confidentiality.

3. The donor must not be in receipt of protease inhibitors, AZT or any 'antiviral drugs'.

4. Only cold heparinised Ringer's solution may be used to dilute the plasma 1/1 ( i.e. 50%).

5. The diluted plasma shall be first filtered by aspiration-filtration, through a 0.6 millipore membrane. The resulting filtrate #1 will then be filtered again, this time using a 0.22 millipore membrane and filtrate #2 will be submitted to ultracentrifugation.

6. Centrifugation at 30,000 g for two hours will be used to prepare a pellet, likely to be extremely small. This pellet will be fixed with glutaraldehyde and osmium, then carefully detached and embedded in epoxy resins following routine EM procedures.

7. The electronmicrograph shall be at least 19,500 x magnification, and must resemble that published in Fig.1 of this article for particle size and shape, but with one notable and important variation. 'HIV' has been deemed to be a lentivirus, possessing a dense core of truncated conical shape. An ultrathin slice of randomly packed lentiviruses must inevitably show a number of particles bisected to show this core lengthwise, as well as end-on, with a resultant apparent mixture of round and 'rod-shaped' dense cores. Any micrograph which does not clearly show this feature will be deemed not to represent the lentivirus 'HIV'.

8. This challenge is open to any qualified scientists, or microbiology students/lab technicians with the necessary lab skills and facilities to carry out the work.

Photographs of the required electron-micrograph(s) plus full details of the methodology, along with brief details of the senders' qualifications, must be sent to me at: [email protected]

Alexander Russell

NB: Etienne de Harven is Emeritus Professor of Pathology, University of Toronto. He worked in electron microscopy primarily on the ultrastructure of retroviruses throughout his professional career of 25 years at the Sloan Kettering Institute in New York, and 13 years at the University of Toronto.

 

[PRIME]

I’m sure a tear came down your eye after jape called you a Secretary, but you know in your heart you a “file clerk” doing medical billing and coding with the certification you got from DeVry.

It’s okay bro, we all gotta start somewhere to get to highest point of the totem pole.

AAAAYYYYOOOOO


IF THIS AINT BOUT DA MOST DISRESPECTFUL POST I DUN READ ON NT IN A GOOD WHILE


LAWD

 

[stuntman mike]

this how it should be though. wild haymakers being thrown but for the most part, nobody catching feelings.
surprised @ksteezy hasn't been brought into this yet
he works in a hospital right?

 

[Comparison Ford]

I’m sure a tear came down your eye after jape called you a Secretary, but you know in your heart you a “file clerk” doing medical billing and coding with the certification you got from DeVry.

It’s okay bro, we all gotta start somewhere to get to highest point of the totem pole.

I just don't get it. Dude's open and transparent about all of his eccentricities/bad behavior, yet when it comes to what he actually does in "the medical field" he's Mr. Bashful all of a sudden.

You ain't gotta be ashamed of yourself and your accomplishments, pa.

 

[nawghtyhare]

I just don't get it. Dude's open and transparent about all of his eccentricities/bad behavior, yet when it comes to what he actually does in "the medical field" he's Mr. Bashful all of a sudden.

You ain't gotta be ashamed of yourself and your accomplishments, pa.

mr bashful nah
but i aint gotta prove or show nothing to any of yall
who is u for me to have to prove anything
reason why i respect DCAllAfrican
he aint stress when i was joking with him
went about his day
bruh u dont pay my bills
or put food on my table
i aint gotta try and prove nothing to u or anyone else
just like nobody has to prove anything to me
only lames take this internet stuff serious anyway