- 7,857
- 33
- Joined
- Jan 12, 2007
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
I remember exactly what you're talking about, but I didn't buy one word of it. Nike is probably the world's biggest athletic footwear company and with the orders they put in to the factories, there's no way they would settle for inconsistencies of their final retail-product from the various factories. That's why they have samples... I don't believe Nike QC would accept anything thats far-off from their agreed-upon design, down to the specific shade of the colors. It's convenient to put the blame on the factories, but I think it just comes down to Nike taking a half-%@* approach. "Ehhh... close enough".Originally Posted by WallyHopp
We heard one 'worker' from Nike post here years ago, saying Factories change methods over the years. Materials and colors change. Finding the match is hard to do. Much like the butchering of the trainer max 91 grey yellows. To some degree, that's acceptable or better yet, understandable. Here... This right here.. Don't tell me you don't have medium grey or cement grey leather/pleather sitting around. You DID that same thing on the auto trainer. This isn't some hard to find "bright green" accent color that factories don't have now. We're talking straight GREY. No more excuses
Originally Posted by cortes21
too much going on for me...
Originally Posted by WallyHopp
Originally Posted by cortes21
too much going on for me...
I somewhat agree with this. Take it back to the beginning. I don't want to create a new topic. but this brings me to the question, Will we ever trend back to where "less is more"?
A lot of these trainers have layers upon layers. They are complex pieces of work. Almost all of these shoes are white based. The last thing you want to do is make the upper busy with weird color placement. Tinker and crew knew what they were doing with the color blocking. One small change can BOTCH up and BUTCHER the entire look of a shoe.
Do you think basic colorways can make a reintroduction as "popular". It seems all the popular stuff now a days are an all orange KD II, all green apple grinch kobes, and all aqua SB lebrons. Shoes used to stand alone and gain attention for the design elements alone. Now its straight up anything all one color and flashy.
These just popped up on ebay
It makes me sad knowing a day we see something so simple may never happen. I know a whole bunch of white based sky force 88 retros are being done for 2011. The V series by Nike. Even your trainer 1 and 1.2 GRs were basic in nature, But they never seemed to capture an audience. It was always the PEs.
There is really only two things you can do to the SC trainer II. All white upper like above, or a very light grey toebox/ankle piece that accents everything else. A very monochromatic spectrum. It's like baking a cake or cooking home made spaghetti sauce. Miss on one ingredient, and it's just not the same.
Like Nike's own Slogan on that photo above: "BUT JUST DO IT RIGHT". You know what shoes garner the most attention that I wear? The most basic colorways. Maybe it'll start a revolution of some sort. There has been so many crazy colorways over the years that we may begin to go back to the basics? The Nike atIII is a good example. For anything basic, you'd have to go back almost a decade. Yet its most popular shoe may be the transformer c/w.
Will we ever trend away from crazy PE's and back to the basics?
Yea i don't think any of us complaining are buying any of the crap thats not done right but it really upsets you when you support a brand for so many years and they don't do right by the retro's. You can't knock us for complaining bottom line is without us this whole retro craze wouldn't even exist. BTW every time I look at the ATC III retro you can't help but think what it should have beenOriginally Posted by Mister Victory
Wally I agree with you 100 percent, I'm not trying to flame or anything like that but I think that we should all settle on the fact that a proper retro will never come to be.
There have been a number of retros that have turn out pretty solid, but for every one well-done retro there have been 10 that fall far below anybody's expectations.
I want the same thing that most of you guys want because I grew up during that era, but if it ain't right, I don't buy
The only evidence we have so far are the known summer and fall colorways. Anything is possible for the future. I think the underlying thought process is that, this model is 21 years old and getting the retro treatment for the first time. Start it off with a bang. If 2012 rolls around and they finally want to get some teal-yellows out or infrareds, both in OG fashion, as retros, I would be ecstatic. Currently, the vibe just isn't very positive, deservedly so. How do you kick start something monumental with sub par colors?Originally Posted by ekhunter1
so how do we know og colors arent coming out? we are just surmizing??
All I really focus on is trainers, so that failure rate is almost all I know. I can count on both hands the # of GR OG colorway retro cross trainers released in the past 10 years (of those maybe half are quality materials). Considering the failure rate you mentioned above and the fact trainers just don't released that often, you are saturating the market with a bunch of LS (lifestyle) themed crap. I would say there may be one decent trainer released every year on average. Knowing the past of cross trainers, Nike's archives or library is so rich with items that they could release 5-10 colorways/models every year and not run out for one-two decades (based on original colorways alone). They could almost compete with the original colorways of the first dozen or so run of Jordans.. Jordan fans, imagine one RETRO released every year of your favorite OG c/w jordan... The upcoming cement Jordan IIIs.... Thats it for 2011.Originally Posted by Mister Victory
Wally I agree with you 100 percent, I'm not trying to flame or anything like that but I think that we should all settle on the fact that a proper retro will never come to be.
There have been a number of retros that have turn out pretty solid, but for every one well-done retro there have been 10 that fall far below anybody's expectations.
I want the same thing that most of you guys want because I grew up during that era, but if it ain't right, I don't buy
Yeah, I was looking forward to ATC III retro and I was really disappointment with how those turned out. As far as trainers go, the black/oxidized green carnivores was well done (the colors where a different hue, but it was close to the originals).Originally Posted by trethousandgt
Yea i don't think any of us complaining are buying any of the crap thats not done right but it really upsets you when you support a brand for so many years and they don't do right by the retro's. You can't knock us for complaining bottom line is without us this whole retro craze wouldn't even exist. BTW every time I look at the ATC III retro you can't help but think what it should have beenOriginally Posted by Mister Victory
Wally I agree with you 100 percent, I'm not trying to flame or anything like that but I think that we should all settle on the fact that a proper retro will never come to be.
There have been a number of retros that have turn out pretty solid, but for every one well-done retro there have been 10 that fall far below anybody's expectations.
I want the same thing that most of you guys want because I grew up during that era, but if it ain't right, I don't buy