bastitch
Staff member
- 1,611
- 173
Basically, you're saying you can't refute anything I just said.Originally Posted by RKO2004
Originally Posted by Bastitch
Originally Posted by RKO2004
Being gay is a CHOICE. People need to stop saying "What if the girl was naturally attracted to other girls?". What if I'm attracted to kiddie porn? Wouldn't many say that its wrong and perverted? What if I said there is nothing wrong with a Man loving a child? I bet it'll be a freaking uproar and I'd be on the run. How the heck are you born with a sexual preference? Thats like saying I was born loving hot wings. It would be crazy. I tasted hot wings and I like them. They may be bad for me but they taste good. Doesn't the same apply for Gay people?
Whether you want to acknowledge that being gay is not a choice or not, comparing it to child pornography is way off base considering with child pornography, a minor is being EXPLOITED for the benefit of adults.
If people that truly thought that homosexuality was a "choice" why aren't they out there leading the crusade to fight the "causes" of homosexuality?
It's because they can't identify the causes because these "causes" don't exist.
OK I agree. I used a stupid example.
So your basically sayiny you think little billy was born digging guys?
If homosexuality is nurtured, then that would mean that their are causes of homosexuality. If your main qualm is that homosexuality is a choice, where are allthe advocates for homosexuality prevention? Why does fight against homosexuality take place after the fact? Why are you arguing against homosexual marriageinstead of fighting for the prevention of homosexuality?
The nature vs. nurture discussion when it comes to homosexuality is a scientific one. But it's very rare that those against it will climb out to refutehomosexuality from behind the cloak of morality and/or religion. Until then, it's really just a pointless debate.