- 747
- 10
- Joined
- Jan 24, 2005
You trippin son. High to medium end plasmas are still the $@@%. You can't touch those contrast ratios and the viewing angles they got.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
I also heard Plasma doesn't do too well at high elevation. 7000' and higher.Originally Posted by hella handsome
because plasma was an overrated standard for a short period of time.
it was more expensive at first, and people chose LCD over it, now LCD is in demand, so companies are charging more for LCD because thats what people buy.
plus, isn't LCD cheaper to produce? and isn't plasma almost a waste of money considering how the image can burn into the screen?
excuse my ignorance if im wrong, but those are things i've heard from a bestbuy guy![]()
No discussion of TV power use would be complete without a bit of perspective. For households that pay somewhere near the average retail cost for energy--11.55 cents per kilowatt per hour in 2009--and that watch near the average amount per TV--about 5.2 hours per day--the cost to watch a 50-inch 1080p plasma TV is about $64 per year in the calibrated light output mode (see How We Test). The average 52- to 55-inch LCD TV costs about $29 per year for the same light output, and, of course, smaller TVs use less energy. Sure, both electricity costs and average daily TV use are increasing steadily every year; however, those amounts still don't take a major chunk out of most household budgets. According to the Department of Energy, for example, the average refrigerator uses nearly $90 worth of energy per year.
so with an average of a $35 greater cost per year for plasmas...that's about $175 for 5 yrs (given no increases in energy prices) or with a guesstimate.. ~$200 after 5 yrs
Most manufacturers are shying away from Plasma's though...and focusing on LCDs these days
Originally Posted by Mitchellicious
Sort of on topic, is 3D a gimmick/fad?
I've got a feeling a whole lot of people are getting fleeced and are going to regret buying these 3D sets in a couple of years.
Originally Posted by The Maverick 41
Originally Posted by Mitchellicious
Sort of on topic, is 3D a gimmick/fad?
I've got a feeling a whole lot of people are getting fleeced and are going to regret buying these 3D sets in a couple of years.
I think it's the 3D fad that's going on now, and IMO i think 3D Tv's will die after a few years, just like the HD-DVD's did a few years ago and etc
I'm not buying into the 3d hype so it will be a easy pass for me![]()
Originally Posted by seasoned vet
Originally Posted by The Maverick 41
Originally Posted by Mitchellicious
Sort of on topic, is 3D a gimmick/fad?
I've got a feeling a whole lot of people are getting fleeced and are going to regret buying these 3D sets in a couple of years.
I think it's the 3D fad that's going on now, and IMO i think 3D Tv's will die after a few years, just like the HD-DVD's did a few years ago and etc
I'm not buying into the 3d hype so it will be a easy pass for me![]()
- so let me get this straight? are you saying HD-DVD was just a fad that subsequently died out?
Originally Posted by The Maverick 41
Originally Posted by seasoned vet
Originally Posted by The Maverick 41
Originally Posted by Mitchellicious
Sort of on topic, is 3D a gimmick/fad?
I've got a feeling a whole lot of people are getting fleeced and are going to regret buying these 3D sets in a couple of years.
I think it's the 3D fad that's going on now, and IMO i think 3D Tv's will die after a few years, just like the HD-DVD's did a few years ago and etc
I'm not buying into the 3d hype so it will be a easy pass for me![]()
- so let me get this straight? are you saying HD-DVD was just a fad that subsequently died out?
yeah... plus Blu Ray finished it off
yeah, and you've contributed nothing we didn't already know.Originally Posted by seasoned vet
NT is the absolute worst place to get reliable information on electronics
Originally Posted by axel f0ley
yeah, and you've contributed nothing I didn't already know.Originally Posted by seasoned vet
NT is the absolute worst place to get reliable information on electronics![]()
As far as bang for the buck, I would look at the Panasonic Viera series. They're not too fancy, but have outstanding picture quality. I've got one and we love it. You should be able to find a 720p model for under $500, less if you go to a haggle-allowing store (HH Gregg, etc.) or if you find a deal on last year's model or a special offer (see my post last page, got mine for about $300 when all said and done).Originally Posted by Mojodmonky1
we're gettin off topic fellas.
back on track... can anyone recommend me a good bang for the buck 42" Plasma? 720P is fine cause its going to be my kitchen TV and wont be playin any games or watching blurays on it or anything![]()
Originally Posted by larrivee7
As far as bang for the buck, I would look at the Panasonic Viera series. They're not too fancy, but have outstanding picture quality. I've got one and we love it. You should be able to find a 720p model for under $500, less if you go to a haggle-allowing store (HH Gregg, etc.) or if you find a deal on last year's model or a special offer (see my post last page, got mine for about $300 when all said and done).Originally Posted by Mojodmonky1
we're gettin off topic fellas.
back on track... can anyone recommend me a good bang for the buck 42" Plasma? 720P is fine cause its going to be my kitchen TV and wont be playin any games or watching blurays on it or anything![]()
LG makes good plasmas that are affordable as well. There may be more, but I've had personal experience with these two brands.
The only thing I would mention is if your kitchen has tons of light coming in, the glare and brightness may bother you on a plasma. Ours is in our tv room, so glare and ambient light isn't an issue. But that would all depend on how you position the tv and where the light comes in from.