- 5,324
- 1,335
- Joined
- Feb 20, 2012
His FG average is 42% tho, seems like a lot of effort to me
I'm a big Iverson fan.. I don't even like Wade but Wade is better
agreed.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
His FG average is 42% tho, seems like a lot of effort to me
I'm a big Iverson fan.. I don't even like Wade but Wade is better
huge iverson fan here but if u would take him over wade please be aware of the damage u r doing to the credibility of your basketball opinions before u post
Iverson took damn near 30 shots a game in his prime.
Only took his team deep in the playoffs one season...ya'll act like Iverson was consistent with the wins.
NahHis FG average is 42% tho, seems like a lot of effort to me
I'm a big Iverson fan.. I don't even like Wade but Wade is better
Nah
FG% don't speak for the whole game dude. Just because you have 50% FG don't mean you're automatically better. If you pay attention to the game. Wade can't shoot like Iverson. He feasted on easy lay up and dunks.
Both played on a weak conference but Iverson got a lot further and more out of his 5'11 frame
iversons mvp season was probably one of the most impressive things ive seen in sports. but i feel like this is moreso a question of who would u rather build a winning team around than whos career would make the best movie. wade just does more things to help a team win on a consistent basis. swap wade for iverson on those nugget teams and they def make it past the first round.
I hate to even say this...but that's like saying Jordan wasn't winning until the Bulls drafted Pippen. I usually don't even use that argument but it's only fair. You do not win in the NBA without a 1-2 or sometimes 1, 2, 3 punch.is the discussion about individual or teams? You say it as if Wade was really winning stuff without Lebron or shaq
Nah
FG% don't speak for the whole game dude. Just because you have 50% FG don't mean you're automatically better. If you pay attention to the game. Wade can't shoot like Iverson. He feasted on easy lay up and dunks.
Both played on a weak conference but Iverson got a lot further and more out of his 5'11 frame
This is amusing.
^ The east was always the weakest conference during AI's prime, compared to the West as a conference overall it was laughable to say the least.
Please answer this...what did AI do after 01?
Son...we handing out awards for making it past the 1st round? Only to turn around and get knocked off in the 2nd round...Where's the consistency?
I think you need to look over A.I.'s career again.
He average 25+, 5 + assists, 2+ steals for a decade and the 76ers were perennially in the top half of the EC and in the second round of the playoffs during the AI years.
Wade had multiple first round boots in the prime of his ability and his team went 15-67 in 07-08 due to his penchant for injuries.
From the 98/99 season to the 2002/03 season, Iverson lead the 6ers to 3 ECF semis and 1 NBA Finals appearance.
From the 2006/07 to the 2009/10 season, Wade and the Heat got bumped 3 times in the first round and failed to make the playoffs once.
Where are these make believe histories and careers coming from?
Winning a ring in the NBA really does give fans amnesia.
No in order to be a complete scorer you need to be able to shoot the 3 and mid range effectively not just easy dunk and lay up.Easy Lay Ups and Dunk > Jumpshots
Iverson went to the finals once, Wade three times. Iverson has 0 rings, Wade has 2. Dont see how Iverson got further.
Dudes always bring up Iverson's height like we're arguing who the better Pound for Pound fighters. We are talking about All Around SG.