Cool
Just went to cnn.com
Had to scroll a decent amount to see the article.
If you think media in US isn’t crazy bias when it comes to this topic then there is no point arguing. Agree to disagree. Carry on.
Of course your circle stops right before the second sentence, which clearly states it was a bombing.
"If you think media in US isn’t crazy bias when it comes to this topic then there is no point arguing" is a strawman argument.
I never said US or media in general isn't biased on this topic. I fully agree that media bias on this conflict is a serious issue.
You made claims, I refuted them with evidence. And your response to the refutation is...to fabricate a strawman argument.
There is no real "arguing" with you, as evidenced by the fact that your response to false statements being proven wrong was to immediately conjure up a brand new lie.
You obviously didn't bother even verifying whether your claims about NYT and CNN's coverage of this bombing were accurate. After all, why bother reading a sentence or two when you can just fabricate false claims to fit your narrative?
You routinely parrot unsourced and unverified claims from random Twitter accounts if they fit your narrative. Because, in your own words, it "sounds believable."
How would you describe someone who uncritically parrots unsourced claims to fit a narrative, makes false statements without any attempt to verify their accuracy because the falsehood fit a narrative, and immediately jumps to outright lying when called out on it?
