- Feb 23, 2014
- 3,090
- 5,879
2012 wasn’t the correct blue.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Those 2012’s are disgustingDon't know if I've seen this posted here yet:
Side by side with the 2012 and the 2024. Don't have the 2012 any more to compare with my shock drop.
Definitely not white. Almost like an off white on most pairs. They probably should have included off white in the color code to let people know.These definitely seem to have almost a very light grey tint to them.
They don’t quite look white like they do in photos.
I can tell that by comparing the toe box to the midsole.
Is that a thing on some pairs?
Yeah it is an off white and the box does say off white on it but yeah at first when I opened mines I was like these things have a bluish tint to themDefinitely not white. Almost like an off white on most pairs. They probably should have included off white in the color code to let people know.
It’s almost like that’s the color of the shoe and has been since 1989Definitely not white. Almost like an off white on most pairs. They probably should have included off white in the color code to let people know.
can’t believe some of these were part of the “remastered” series. And some of the reimagined Air Jordans are turning out a bit better than remastered versions. I would unofficially include the mb IV as part of the reimagined line, I mean if the reimagined black/red IV was remodeled after 89 specs, the mb IV was remodeled after the 89 specs too, but not a part of the reimagined line.Wow!
Huge difference in the shape. Makes the shoe look completely different compare to the wc4
Fire red (wish it had that military height)
WC (2016) night and day
Bonus
Lovely!
These definitely seem to have almost a very light grey tint to them.
They don’t quite look white like they do in photos.
I can tell that by comparing the toe box to the midsole.
Is that a thing on some pairs?
Definitely not white. Almost like an off white on most pairs. They probably should have included off white in the color code to let people know.
It’s almost like that’s the color of the shoe and has been since 1989
Wow!
Huge difference in the shape. Makes the shoe look completely different compare to the wc4
Fire red (wish it had that military height)
WC (2016) night and day
Bonus
Lovely!
No, I think it depends on the factory.Jesus. This is the answer and always has been:
No, you’re wrong, they’re supposed to be off white or whatever you want to call it, just like the OG was. This is not up for argument.No, I think it depends on the factory.
Those 2012’s are disgusting
Probably the same dopes who think the crap XIs we got for so long look better than the new ones. These people have no eye for design, it’s that simpleThe crazy part is on that IG post by zsneakerheads (same pic) people are saying the exact opposite.
Same. I feel like almost everyone who tried on the shock drop won, except for me…Man these pics got me going crazy lol.
How the **** didn’t I win the shock drop. I was on a roll surprisingly.
I really like that shade of blue. It’s not the 89 blue, but had we gotten that blue I would not have been mad. That shape tho… what were they thinking?! They might as well have called it a different shoe. Did they have an intern design it from memory?!Those 2012’s are disgusting