- 44,765
- 66,480
- Joined
- Mar 24, 2001
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
I'd do it, depending on how often Randle is injured. Counting on having AD all the time is foolish at this point. When he's out, everything collapses. I want a front court that is strong when he's out, (which will be a lot), but STRONGER when he's in.
Plus I like Randle. And I think his game compliments Bron perfectly.
-foe
Facts. I think Randle would work. He’d have the ball in his hand enough.
We do need additional shooters though.
Playoff thread not exciting enough for you?Factos…
You gentlemen know what you’re talking about. You know ball.
Disappointed in the rest of you objecting to this trade scenario
I'd take the NY deal but I read NY wants no parts of Russ.
It’s just jokestay1
This Philly game sucks. Saw this thread kept bumpin in Sports. Read some delightful news (from you) and thought I’d add to the great conversation.
Jeeeeez
NY is almost as badly ran as us so anything is possible.I'd take the NY deal but I read NY wants no parts of Russ.
they must be on drugs up northI'd take the NY deal but I read NY wants no parts of Russ.
You should still try and see how long you can get away with it before someone notices.Not allowed.
You should still try and see how long you can get away with it before someone notices.
I'm tired of going into this thread and thinking if I entered CoachTalk.You jus tryin to get me perma banned.
Essentially, that's it.there is no trade out there involving Russell Westbrook that will make this team a title contender
You should still try and see how long you can get away with it before someone notices.