MVP
Supporter
- 82,914
- 85,325
- Joined
- Feb 28, 2008
Read the interview Jackie McMullen just had and I'm sure your tune will change. Dude is a clown of the highest order.
|| LocK Dis Up ||
- Thread in 'Sports & Training' Thread starter Started by licensed to ball,
- Start date
- Status
Read the interview Jackie McMullen just had and I'm sure your tune will change. Dude is a clown of the highest order.
- 23,933
- 5,933
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2005
You guys are acting like Oak is an old bum or something.
Why wouldnt you consider it?
If Philly gave us 1st round draft picks AND Okafor you guys are really gonna sit there and act like its an insulting offer?
Hell wrong with us? Nah...the hell is wrong with ya'll!?
Why wouldnt you consider it?
If Philly gave us 1st round draft picks AND Okafor you guys are really gonna sit there and act like its an insulting offer?
Hell wrong with us? Nah...the hell is wrong with ya'll!?
Last edited:
- 2,433
- 1,128
- Joined
- Nov 1, 2011
Yup, I was actually thinking that I would want him back before reading it.
The most telling part was when he said he practices shooting jumpers but won't do it in game because he's afraid of what other ppl will say.
That's always been his prob and the main reason why Kobe didn't respect him. He's mentally weak.
You guys are acting like Oak is an old bum or something.
Why wouldnt you consider it?
If Philly gave us 1st round draft picks AND Okafor you guys are really gonna sit there and act like its an insulting offer?
Hell wrong with us? Nah...the hell is wrong with ya'll!?
Oak + 24 is not better than Ingram. Oak already just caught a pretty bad leg injury, he's acted a fool, and he's a year closer to his extension, AND he's a year and a half older than Ingram.
- 23,933
- 5,933
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2005
You guys are acting like Oak is an old bum or something.
Why wouldnt you consider it?
If Philly gave us 1st round draft picks AND Okafor you guys are really gonna sit there and act like its an insulting offer?
Hell wrong with us? Nah...the hell is wrong with ya'll!?
Oak + 24 is not better than Ingram. Oak already just caught a pretty bad leg injury, he's acted a fool, and he's a year closer to his extension, AND he's a year and a half older than Ingram.
Youth isnt everything man.
Youre the one always preaching "assets are everything."
They can offer better than just Oak and the 24. Youre telling me if they offer Oak, the 24, and next years first you really wouldnt consider it?
Brandon Ingram is worth that much to you? Just because hes 1 year younger and hasnt "acted a fool" yet
MVP
Supporter
- 82,914
- 85,325
- Joined
- Feb 28, 2008
Just trade D'Lo for Oak...
[emoji]128518[/emoji]
[emoji]128518[/emoji]
You guys are acting like Oak is an old bum or something.
Why wouldnt you consider it?
If Philly gave us 1st round draft picks AND Okafor you guys are really gonna sit there and act like its an insulting offer?
Hell wrong with us? Nah...the hell is wrong with ya'll!?
Oak + 24 is not better than Ingram. Oak already just caught a pretty bad leg injury, he's acted a fool, and he's a year closer to his extension, AND he's a year and a half older than Ingram.
Youth isnt everything man.
Youre the one always preaching "assets are everything."
They can offer better than just Oak and the 24. Youre telling me if they offer Oak, the 24, and next years first you really wouldnt consider it?
Brandon Ingram is worth that much to you? Just because hes 1 year younger and hasnt "acted a fool" yet
Dude, the 76ers wouldn't consider it. They aren't giving us next year's pick, settle down.
And yes, I rather have Ingram than Oak. That 1 year means having to pay up sooner (key), Ingram is healthier (key) and yes, he hasn't been out in the streets bein stupid (yet) (key) So yes, all signs say Ingram is better to have than Oak + 24. (you aren't getting next year's pick)
Last edited:
- 23,933
- 5,933
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2005
You guys are acting like Oak is an old bum or something.
Why wouldnt you consider it?
If Philly gave us 1st round draft picks AND Okafor you guys are really gonna sit there and act like its an insulting offer?
Hell wrong with us? Nah...the hell is wrong with ya'll!?
Oak + 24 is not better than Ingram. Oak already just caught a pretty bad leg injury, he's acted a fool, and he's a year closer to his extension, AND he's a year and a half older than Ingram.
Youth isnt everything man.
Youre the one always preaching "assets are everything."
They can offer better than just Oak and the 24. Youre telling me if they offer Oak, the 24, and next years first you really wouldnt consider it?
Brandon Ingram is worth that much to you? Just because hes 1 year younger and hasnt "acted a fool" yet
Dude, the 76ers wouldn't consider it. They aren't giving us next year's pick, settle down.
You guys are the one constantly posting wild hypothetical situations that never happen.
I decide to comment on one of them and you say "settle down"
Why dont we all settle down then and stop talking any trade scenarios since theyre all unrealistic?
I get it, you're in a mood, but relax. Say it out loud "maybe the 76ers will gives us Oak, another first round pick, AND a first round pick next year....."
You see the 76ers in pick giveaways much? They are in pick collections, not throwaways. It ain't happenin.
You see the 76ers in pick giveaways much? They are in pick collections, not throwaways. It ain't happenin.
MVP
Supporter
- 82,914
- 85,325
- Joined
- Feb 28, 2008
You guys are the one constantly posting wild hypothetical situations that never happen.
I decide to comment on one of them and you say "settle down"
Why dont we all settle down then and stop talking any trade scenarios since theyre all unrealistic?
Their takes >>>>> our clown takes. Even though they have just as much or less of a chance of happening.
- 23,933
- 5,933
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2005
You guys are the one constantly posting wild hypothetical situations that never happen.
I decide to comment on one of them and you say "settle down"
Why dont we all settle down then and stop talking any trade scenarios since theyre all unrealistic?
Their takes >>>>> our clown takes. Even though they have just as much or less of a chance of happening.
Word.
Signing Derozan, Batum, Whiteside, KD, Conley and Dwight again is all realistic and worth daily discussion.
But discussing an Okafor trade for multiple Sixer picks, when theyre clearly looking to trade him, is a "moody" clown take.
- 21,981
- 9,864
- Joined
- Oct 22, 2012
(comiendo palomitas)
- 23,933
- 5,933
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2005
- 2,452
- 403
- Joined
- Dec 8, 2004
Oak is a good player, nothing wrong with that offer, I personally wouldn't take it but I mean he got more ROY votes than D'Lo.
- 21,981
- 9,864
- Joined
- Oct 22, 2012
- 18,698
- 13,031
- Joined
- Apr 24, 2006
- 39,174
- 40,490
- Joined
- Feb 5, 2013
Word.Their takes >>>>> our clown takes. Even though they have just as much or less of a chance of happening.You guys are the one constantly posting wild hypothetical situations that never happen.
I decide to comment on one of them and you say "settle down"
Why dont we all settle down then and stop talking any trade scenarios since theyre all unrealistic?
Signing Derozan, Batum, Whiteside, KD, Conley and Dwight again is all realistic and worth daily discussion.
But discussing an Okafor trade for multiple Sixer picks, when theyre clearly looking to trade him, is a "moody" clown take.
- 273
- 223
- Joined
- Oct 24, 2012
Crazy yall considering trading for Oak.
I'd much rather packaged our #2 & Clarkson for Porzingis + filler all day
I'd much rather packaged our #2 & Clarkson for Porzingis + filler all day
- 11,376
- 12,548
- Joined
- Jan 4, 2012
You guys are the one constantly posting wild hypothetical situations that never happen.
I decide to comment on one of them and you say "settle down"
Why dont we all settle down then and stop talking any trade scenarios since theyre all unrealistic?
Their takes >>>>> our clown takes. Even though they have just as much or less of a chance of happening.
Word.
Signing Derozan, Batum, Whiteside, KD, Conley and Dwight again is all realistic and worth daily discussion.
But discussing an Okafor trade for multiple Sixer picks, when theyre clearly looking to trade him, is a "moody" clown take.
Seriously tho why the **** would we want Okafor.
He can't play D, he's not a great rebounder, he's not very athletic for his size and age, and Ingram/Simmons both have potential to be superstars in this league.
We at least know what Oak is capable of bringing to the table and I don't see why we would trade our 2nd for him and a late first rounder
Cmon son.
Last edited:
- 91,230
- 125,389
- Joined
- Sep 5, 2010
Mitch Kupchak: Lakers intention at this time is to use No. 2 pick.
http://am570lasports.iheart.com/ona...ch-kupchak-lakers-intention-at-this-14732468/
12 minute interview.
http://am570lasports.iheart.com/ona...ch-kupchak-lakers-intention-at-this-14732468/
12 minute interview.
- 18,756
- 10,153
- Joined
- Jan 3, 2011
Jhalil Okafor
Dude even in the right situation will be lucky if he makes a few all star teams in his career.
Dude even in the right situation will be lucky if he makes a few all star teams in his career.
- 18,756
- 10,153
- Joined
- Jan 3, 2011
- 18,756
- 10,153
- Joined
- Jan 3, 2011
Last edited:
- 23,933
- 5,933
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2005
1 year removed from being wanted by 90% of the thread, apparently hes now a bum just because he played for the worst franchise in NBA history and had a few issues as a rookie.
NT gon NT.
NT gon NT.
- Status
