- 11,654
- 13,623
Ezeli just got 2 years/16 mill with the 2nd year as a team option from the blazers. cue the seinfeld getting up walking out gif
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
At first I thought you were saying 16M a year. Nope, entire contract was $15.2M. Well, lets hope 34 year old mozgov can lug his big *** around at the end of the contract.Ezeli just got 2 years 16 mill with the 2nd year as a team option from the blazers. cue the seinfeld getting up walking out gif
Ezeli just got 2 years 16 mill with the 2nd year as a team option from the blazers. cue the seinfeld getting up walking out gif
At first I thought you were saying 16M a year. Nope, entire contract was $15.2M. Well, lets hope 34 year old mozgov can lug his big *** around at the end of the contract.
Ezeli just got 2 years/16 mill with the 2nd year as a team option from the blazers. cue the seinfeld getting up walking out gif
Medicals huh? You mean like a 30 year old who had unsuccessful knee surgery the past season? Spin spin spin.
He rushed coming back from a removed cyst. You understand that compared to Ezeli's health problems (which have limited him to 46 games each of the last two seasons) that Mozgov has it much better, right?
Luke coached Festus all year and didn't even have him come in for a discussion. That should tell you enough about his health.
I'm curious what mamba actually expected to happen heading into this offseason
Which bottom 5 team has been able to do that? The wolves? Brandon rush and Cole Aldrich, you would've been cool with that?
Are we actually compromised going forward tho? It's kind of a pickle. Good to great players want to play on good to great teams yet for the most part only the bottom of the league had room for two max players anyway. As far as I know we still have room for one max and now we're not such a crappy team.
The deals we made are about providing the future core of this team the support it needs to develop correctly and with the best possible influences. There is value in bringing in players with well-respected character and capable of fitting alongside your youth without stifling them. More importantly, to attract these kind of players to a bad team requires being willing to pay a premium for it. No one expected the Lakers to compete this year, and we weren't going to compete next year either.
Who could we have expected to come next year that would fundamentally change our current path to being contenders? No one. Instead, we chose to develop our most important assets so that they have every tool available to them to become this franchise's future.
I don't understand how that can be misunderstood or criticized. There is no home-run signing or trade that will immediately transform our situation. This is about sitting back and developing with time.
very open-mindedThe deals we made are about providing the future core of this team the support it needs to develop correctly and with the best possible influences. There is value in bringing in players with well-respected character and capable of fitting alongside your youth without stifling them. More importantly, to attract these kind of players to a bad team requires being willing to pay a premium for it. No one expected the Lakers to compete this year, and we weren't going to compete next year either.
Who could we have expected to come next year that would fundamentally change our current path to being contenders? No one. Instead, we chose to develop our most important assets so that they have every tool available to them to become this franchise's future.
I don't understand how that can be misunderstood or criticized. There is no home-run signing or trade that will immediately transform our situation. This is about sitting back and developing with time.
I'm curious what mamba actually expected to happen heading into this offseason
I was thinking the same thing. Luke had to have had some inside info on the guy or his personality
The deals we made are about providing the future core of this team the support it needs to develop correctly and with the best possible influences. There is value in bringing in players with well-respected character and capable of fitting alongside your youth without stifling them. More importantly, to attract these kind of players to a bad team requires being willing to pay a premium for it. No one expected the Lakers to compete this year, and we weren't going to compete next year either.
Who could we have expected to come next year that would fundamentally change our current path to being contenders? No one. Instead, we chose to develop our most important assets so that they have every tool available to them to become this franchise's future.
I don't understand how that can be misunderstood or criticized. There is no home-run signing or trade that will immediately transform our situation. This is about sitting back and developing with time.
Your comprehension skills need some work.
If they didn't get a young or a marquee free agent to sign older guys to 2 year deals that would keep flexibility going forward, like they've done the past few seasons. I said it from the get go.
Just look at the two teams who most closely resemble us at the moment in Philly and Minny. Both have young cores that need developing, both have looked to sign veteran help but not at a long term premium cost. That was possible here as well given who we signed, we're behaving more like the Nets who don't have a young core, or the Wizards who are just sputtering around with no real direction.