- 281
- 19
- Joined
- Oct 10, 2005
I only have one NT staff member *cough* Manglor *cough* on my list of references, but now it looks like I'll have to take him off.
manglor is the greatest person ever but is a terrible seller (pics bottom of page 1 and 4 AND 14)
- Thread in 'General' Thread starter Started by kobe4threebang,
- Start date
mateen cleaves
Banned
- 10,196
- 12
- Joined
- May 11, 2008
awesome shoes bro!
- 1,117
- 27
- Joined
- Jul 12, 2008
cliffnotes anyone?
im not tryin to read all 17 pages.
im not tryin to read all 17 pages.
sirius lee handsome
Banned
- 9,918
- 12
- Joined
- Feb 26, 2009
He gave him that hush money.
- 20,083
- 18,003
- Joined
- Jan 19, 2007
- 2,238
- 12
- Joined
- Feb 19, 2000
That gif was AWESOME.
Cliffnotes...
Dude was unhappy with some shoes he bought for 100 bucks. NEVER ASKED FOR A REFUND OF ANY KIND. Posted a thread here then finally told me about it once it waslike 9 pages long. STILL NEVER ASKED FOR A REFUND OF ANY KIND. Finally after pages of needless yet hilarious stupidity dude said he wanted 50 bucks back but ofcourse he really really wanted to keep the shoes he claimed he disliked so much.
I said sure thing if he apologized and changed the title of the thread.
He apologized and changed the title of the thread and i gave him what he wanted.
Now i need someone to turn that GIF into an avatar for me...
Cliffnotes...
Dude was unhappy with some shoes he bought for 100 bucks. NEVER ASKED FOR A REFUND OF ANY KIND. Posted a thread here then finally told me about it once it waslike 9 pages long. STILL NEVER ASKED FOR A REFUND OF ANY KIND. Finally after pages of needless yet hilarious stupidity dude said he wanted 50 bucks back but ofcourse he really really wanted to keep the shoes he claimed he disliked so much.
I said sure thing if he apologized and changed the title of the thread.
He apologized and changed the title of the thread and i gave him what he wanted.
Now i need someone to turn that GIF into an avatar for me...
- 5,899
- 84
- Joined
- Mar 5, 2009
shouldve spoken to you first before he tried to air you out....
chi ill
Banned
- 2,621
- 11
- Joined
- Jan 23, 2009
No actually I did , but dudes was saying $125 isnt a good price for the Cool Greys that Manglor posted , because they definitely are .
But unluckily, the shoes weren't in that condition .
Dudes are crazy if they think that Cool Greys aren't going for way more than $125 in the condition they were "supposed" to be in .
Manglor is bogus & grimey though , that's ridiculous for sending him those shoes like that , he worked those angles .
- 2,125
- 108
- Joined
- Sep 29, 2006
Originally Posted by s dubl
peep Manglor in the car...you're the man Crank
- 636
- 441
- Joined
- Aug 6, 2002
Crank lol.
- 12,343
- 6,747
- Joined
- Nov 18, 2000
couldnt have said it better.
- 1,449
- 20
- Joined
- Jul 29, 2008
Wouldve saved a lot of time too
- 10,490
- 229
- Joined
- May 2, 2001
- 2,121
- 353
- Joined
- Jan 17, 2008
LOL @ that Gif. Should have thrown a couple little ink stains on the shoes....
And
@ people saying "Well he had stains in his description." Stains on anythng you are selling or buying is a BIG part of the transaction. Pics ofsaid stains is a MUST.
And
- 4,133
- 392
- Joined
- Jan 30, 2009
Fixed
- 10,490
- 229
- Joined
- May 2, 2001
but yet OP(according to Manglor) didn't request any pics.Originally Posted by tree4twenty
LOL @ that Gif. Should have thrown a couple little ink stains on the shoes....
And@ people saying "Well he had stains in his description." Stains on anythng you are selling or buying is a BIG part of the transaction. Pics of said stains is a MUST.
or if you want to go by the OP, he requested some, but Manglor did not want to provide
either way... the OP STILL went through with the transaction. now...where does the fault really lie?
Caveat emptor.
- 8,649
- 21
- Joined
- Oct 12, 2007
- 4,133
- 392
- Joined
- Jan 30, 2009
Dirtylicious wrote:
tree4twenty wrote:
LOL @ that Gif. Should have thrown a couple little ink stains on the shoes....
And@ people saying "Well he had stains in his description." Stains on anythng you are selling or buying is a BIG part of the transaction. Pics of said stains is a MUST.
but yet OP(according to Manglor) didn't request any pics.
or if you want to go by the OP, he requested some, but Manglor did not want to provide
either way... the OP STILL went through with the transaction. now...where does the fault really lie?
Caveat emptor.
Why would the OP think a buy/sell mod would pull a fast one on him though? Basically OP's mistake was trusting NT staff. Some one who should be helpingmake things better who SHOULD be trust worthy and honest. Yet the fault lies only on OP's shoulders. Ok dirty your right it has nothing to do with yourfellow staff being shady
- 10,490
- 229
- Joined
- May 2, 2001
what fast one?.. the shoes were described as used and having ink stains
yet, you can't see any stains in the pics...so where do you think they would be?.
whoever's account regarding additional you want to believe OP's or Manglors....there were definitely enough reasons for OP to not go through with thetransaction.
I don't know Manglor from the next person... and the fact that he's a buy/sell guide doesn't sway my decision.
so like I said and keep saying.....it's up the OP/buyer to do their due diligence on what they're buying.
...regardless of it's NT staff or not.
yet, you can't see any stains in the pics...so where do you think they would be?.
whoever's account regarding additional you want to believe OP's or Manglors....there were definitely enough reasons for OP to not go through with thetransaction.
I don't know Manglor from the next person... and the fact that he's a buy/sell guide doesn't sway my decision.
so like I said and keep saying.....it's up the OP/buyer to do their due diligence on what they're buying.
...regardless of it's NT staff or not.
- 2,121
- 353
- Joined
- Jan 17, 2008
Originally Posted by Dirtylicious
but yet OP(according to Manglor) didn't request any pics.Originally Posted by tree4twenty
LOL @ that Gif. Should have thrown a couple little ink stains on the shoes....
And@ people saying "Well he had stains in his description." Stains on anythng you are selling or buying is a BIG part of the transaction. Pics of said stains is a MUST.
or if you want to go by the OP, he requested some, but Manglor did not want to provide
either way... the OP STILL went through with the transaction. now...where does the fault really lie?
Caveat emptor.
True.
If seller declines more pics, then something is up and OP isnt too bright.
At the same time, denying pics cause you know that the buyer wont buy them just to make the sale is shady. (IF he denied the pics)
Honestly, I dont see OP asking for more pics based on the fact that one of the pics showed a stain, so he figures Manglor isnt hiding anything.
Well, Manglor WAS hiding things and that is just wrong. Flaws in anything you are buying selling sways the buy/sell price drastically and hiding half of theflaws ON PURPOSE for extra money is being dishonest.
If he said they had a stain in the description and one of his pics showed a stain, I wouldnt ask for more pics either....
In the end, Manglor was shady and OP should have gone about it different.
The soles coming off is another story....
And LOL @ Manglor saying the stains should come out easily. Ink is far from easy to get out....
- 2,121
- 353
- Joined
- Jan 17, 2008
And he didnt describe them as Ink stains he just said stains that would come out easily. Reread the 1st post for description...
And yes you can see a stain in the pics provided to the OP, so he figured that this was the only stains:
- 2,659
- 116
- Joined
- Jan 5, 2009
This is what happens when people beast and get all hyped thinking they got a steal. I mean what did you pay for them, you probably got your money's worth.You should have just saved your $ and copped a DS pair or waited like the rest of us patiently and copped the retro when ever it releases again.
- 4,133
- 392
- Joined
- Jan 30, 2009
tree4twenty wrote:
but yet OP(according to Manglor) didn't request any pics.Originally Posted by Dirtylicious
tree4twenty wrote:
LOL @ that Gif. Should have thrown a couple little ink stains on the shoes....
And@ people saying "Well he had stains in his description." Stains on anythng you are selling or buying is a BIG part of the transaction. Pics of said stains is a MUST.
or if you want to go by the OP, he requested some, but Manglor did not want to provide
either way... the OP STILL went through with the transaction. now...where does the fault really lie?
Caveat emptor.
True.
If seller declines more pics, then something is up and OP isnt too bright.
At the same time, denying pics cause you know that the buyer wont buy them just to make the sale is shady. (IF he denied the pics)
Honestly, I dont see OP asking for more pics based on the fact that one of the pics showed a stain, so he figures Manglor isnt hiding anything.
Well, Manglor WAS hiding things and that is just wrong. Flaws in anything you are buying selling sways the buy/sell price drastically and hiding half of the flaws ON PURPOSE for extra money is being dishonest.
If he said they had a stain in the description and one of his pics showed a stain, I wouldnt ask for more pics either....
In the end, Manglor was shady and OP should have gone about it different.
The soles coming off is another story....
And LOL @ Manglor saying the stains should come out easily. Ink is far from easy to get out....
Exactly. Dirty maybe you don't really go over to buy/sell much but when there is a certain flaw in your description you are suppose to have pics of thatflaw. If a mod who should obviously know how to make a proper listing states that there is minor stains, and puts up those pics like Manglor did then I wouldthink it's that little bit that's in those pics. Him having these pics and having that description is deceiving regardless of if OP asked for more picsor not. If you have those kinda pics it's to make it seem as if those stains are so minor that you can't really see them. In that pic the shoes areobviously used but it says nothing about the back material coming off. I don't know about I S S cause I have never used that site but on the other sites Ifrequent and have bought shoes from the mods are nothing like this and conduct them selves and handle business in a proper way. So I see why dude would put histrust into the mod regardless of him knowing him or not because I personally would have done the same seeing as how every mod I have ever encountered has beena perfect transaction. Especially with NT being as strict as it is I would expect the mods on here to meet to the standards of some of the lesser sites. But Iguess I was wrong.
- 1,962
- 48
- Joined
- Apr 30, 2006
Originally Posted by Wade187
tree4twenty wrote:
but yet OP(according to Manglor) didn't request any pics.Originally Posted by Dirtylicious
tree4twenty wrote:
LOL @ that Gif. Should have thrown a couple little ink stains on the shoes....
And@ people saying "Well he had stains in his description." Stains on anythng you are selling or buying is a BIG part of the transaction. Pics of said stains is a MUST.
or if you want to go by the OP, he requested some, but Manglor did not want to provide
either way... the OP STILL went through with the transaction. now...where does the fault really lie?
Caveat emptor.
True.
If seller declines more pics, then something is up and OP isnt too bright.
At the same time, denying pics cause you know that the buyer wont buy them just to make the sale is shady. (IF he denied the pics)
Honestly, I dont see OP asking for more pics based on the fact that one of the pics showed a stain, so he figures Manglor isnt hiding anything.
Well, Manglor WAS hiding things and that is just wrong. Flaws in anything you are buying selling sways the buy/sell price drastically and hiding half of the flaws ON PURPOSE for extra money is being dishonest.
If he said they had a stain in the description and one of his pics showed a stain, I wouldnt ask for more pics either....
In the end, Manglor was shady and OP should have gone about it different.
The soles coming off is another story....
And LOL @ Manglor saying the stains should come out easily. Ink is far from easy to get out....
Exactly. Dirty maybe you don't really go over to buy/sell much but when there is a certain flaw in your description you are suppose to have pics of that flaw. If a mod who should obviously know how to make a proper listing states that there is minor stains, and puts up those pics like Manglor did then I would think it's that little bit that's in those pics. Him having these pics and having that description is deceiving regardless of if OP asked for more pics or not. If you have those kinda pics it's to make it seem as if those stains are so minor that you can't really see them. In that pic the shoes are obviously used but it says nothing about the back material coming off. I don't know about I S S cause I have never used that site but on the other sites I frequent and have bought shoes from the mods are nothing like this and conduct them selves and handle business in a proper way. So I see why dude would put his trust into the mod regardless of him knowing him or not because I personally would have done the same seeing as how every mod I have ever encountered has been a perfect transaction. Especially with NT being as strict as it is I would expect the mods on here to meet to the standards of some of the lesser sites. But I guess I was wrong.
Well put. I really can't believe Dirty is siding with Manglor on this one.
- 10,490
- 229
- Joined
- May 2, 2001
Originally Posted by Wade187
tree4twenty wrote:
but yet OP(according to Manglor) didn't request any pics.Originally Posted by Dirtylicious
tree4twenty wrote:
LOL @ that Gif. Should have thrown a couple little ink stains on the shoes....
And@ people saying "Well he had stains in his description." Stains on anythng you are selling or buying is a BIG part of the transaction. Pics of said stains is a MUST.
or if you want to go by the OP, he requested some, but Manglor did not want to provide
either way... the OP STILL went through with the transaction. now...where does the fault really lie?
Caveat emptor.
True.
If seller declines more pics, then something is up and OP isnt too bright.
At the same time, denying pics cause you know that the buyer wont buy them just to make the sale is shady. (IF he denied the pics)
Honestly, I dont see OP asking for more pics based on the fact that one of the pics showed a stain, so he figures Manglor isnt hiding anything.
Well, Manglor WAS hiding things and that is just wrong. Flaws in anything you are buying selling sways the buy/sell price drastically and hiding half of the flaws ON PURPOSE for extra money is being dishonest.
If he said they had a stain in the description and one of his pics showed a stain, I wouldnt ask for more pics either....
In the end, Manglor was shady and OP should have gone about it different.
The soles coming off is another story....
And LOL @ Manglor saying the stains should come out easily. Ink is far from easy to get out....
Exactly. Dirty maybe you don't really go over to buy/sell much but when there is a certain flaw in your description you are suppose to have pics of that flaw. If a mod who should obviously know how to make a proper listing states that there is minor stains, and puts up those pics like Manglor did then I would think it's that little bit that's in those pics. Him having these pics and having that description is deceiving regardless of if OP asked for more pics or not. If you have those kinda pics it's to make it seem as if those stains are so minor that you can't really see them. In that pic the shoes are obviously used but it says nothing about the back material coming off. I don't know about I S S cause I have never used that site but on the other sites I frequent and have bought shoes from the mods are nothing like this and conduct them selves and handle business in a proper way. So I see why dude would put his trust into the mod regardless of him knowing him or not because I personally would have done the same seeing as how every mod I have ever encountered has been a perfect transaction. Especially with NT being as strict as it is I would expect the mods on here to meet to the standards of some of the lesser sites. But I guess I was wrong.
1. I don't go over to buy/sell at all.
2. I don't even see any stains in the pic above.
from me...it sounds like
1. Manglor did an airfob
2. OP jumped on the price to make sure no one else got them
If anything..there's equal blame to go around... but, at the end of the day it's up to the buyer to know exactly what he's getting... it seems thathe didn't do that.
Originally Posted by JosephSKC
Well put. I really can't believe Dirty is siding with Manglor on this one.Kinda makes you wonder....
be a man and say it straight up what you're trying to imply...or don't say anything at all....
Similar threads
