- 4,676
- 13
- Joined
- Oct 8, 2008
Humble response by Waka.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Originally Posted by XxHonchoxX
Humble response by Waka.
Originally Posted by MR MONDAY NIIGHT
Them?
OB4CLII was a solo album
not a group album..
yezzirOriginally Posted by MrWavez
Originally Posted by B Smooth 202
Not paying attention? I know our statements in this situation are more general but I definitely do my homework and know my history (which proceeds hip hop), especially when its MY culture. 90s babys representin'Originally Posted by SEND ONE
Wrong. It's your fault for not paying attention when grown folk are trying to teach y'all.Originally Posted by B Smooth 202
Don't be mad at this generation, it's your fault for not teaching them better.![]()
we here![]()
Originally Posted by Dathbgboy
It aint got nothin do w/ puttin Hip Hop in a one-dimensional box. U gotta look at the difference between those two songs u mentioned. One is sayin Stanky Leg this and that, we know what dance u doin, now what else u got to tell us? nothin. Oh, that's right, ur bro is doin the stanky leg too, that's some new infoOriginally Posted by Mrsouthernhospitality
why is it so wrong to make a song about a dance it all fall in the same category to me for example stanky leg and lets say low by flo-rida would be looked at as a dance song even though stanky leg is actually a dance nobody would look at it any different and the same dudes would be #@!%$@^ about it I hate when dudes put hip hop music in a little one dimensional box this is the only genre of music where cats #@!$ about the most stupidest $#!%Originally Posted by Dathbgboy
It's one thing to make music to dance to, it's another to make music about a dance. I personally hate all that @$%#. Dudes really have no creativity. The name of the song is about a dance, the name of the dance is mentioned in the verses 3+ timesOriginally Posted by Mrsouthernhospitality
I agree with wacka on his response some dudes only want hip hop to be one dimensional and I know wu tang got history and all that but what you call hip hop is not law homie and there is no reason to blame the fans for it for the simple reason they are fans there the people that buy the music because they like it and what really kills me about these type of comments about some hip hop� http://www.youtube.com/v/HGj1RvOo-2g?f=videos&app=youtube_gdatahttp://www.youtube.com/v/HGj1RvOo-2g?f=videos&app=youtube_gdata http://www.youtube.com/v/HGj1RvOo-2g?f=videos&app=youtube_gdatahttp://www.youtube.com/v/HGj1RvOo-2g?f=videos&app=youtube_gdata being dance music like they weren't dancing in the rappers delight video.![]()
Yea, it's all in fun, but at what point do u change it up and rap about somethin w/ substance? And no how many bricks u flip aint substance.� And I'm not even talkin bout the South, I'm talkin bout that type of music in general.
U kno, that's the first thing that came to mind when I first heard this interview. I understand dudes are certified legends in the game, no denyin that, but at the same time they grown !%% men and get all butt hurt when somebody who is clearly on his @$%# right now says that if they were to battle in this day that he would win. I honestly lost respect for dude after this. I still like em as artists but that's just sadOriginally Posted by youngjordan23
So these dudes could disrespect a region but its blasphemy for joe budden to speak on them
. Flo-Rida, though wasn't on no knowledge kickin $$##, which it shouldn't be since it's a dance/club song, was actually rappin within context. Like I said there's a difference between songs for dance and songs about a dance.![]()
It's only a contradiction if Waka has a 7 year run and Meth still says his "career is on a short leash."Originally Posted by tune205
But didnt Meth just say Waka's career is on a short leash? As in he probably wont be around long but if Wu Tang has a 7 year run and falls off we should "remember the times" even though they arent really relevant anymore. Sounds like a contradiction.
Originally Posted by Master Zik
It's only a contradiction if Waka has a 7 year run and Meth still says his "career is on a short leash."Originally Posted by tune205
But didnt Meth just say Waka's career is on a short leash? As in he probably wont be around long but if Wu Tang has a 7 year run and falls off we should "remember the times" even though they arent really relevant anymore. Sounds like a contradiction.
If that's what he meant then it's completely false. Meth already got a 15 year career. What short leash is he on? Dude can say w/e the *++# he wants. He also doesn't have much of a problem dropping albums on DJ of all places.Originally Posted by MusicalExcellence
i think he meant that meth is on a short leash as well so he has no room to talk...Originally Posted by Master Zik
It's only a contradiction if Waka has a 7 year run and Meth still says his "career is on a short leash."Originally Posted by tune205
But didnt Meth just say Waka's career is on a short leash? As in he probably wont be around long but if Wu Tang has a 7 year run and falls off we should "remember the times" even though they arent really relevant anymore. Sounds like a contradiction.
Originally Posted by PleaseSayTheBaby23
who ever said ATLANTA is on there last leg![]()
![]()
![]()
SLAP UR SELF
T.I. next album will be classic and will shut the game down will sell well
Jeezy gonna give the dboys what they want with 103
Usher......well Usher do what Usher do ain't Usher no more
Outkast suppose to do there solo's then drop another Kast albumIll believe it when I see it
Luda killin the rap/pop scene with Battle Of The Sexes
Soulja Boy, Yung LA, J Money, Travis Porter, Flacka won't be relevant that much longer (cept SB)
The Dream....same with Usher...The Dream is The Dream
Gucci gonna stay with some buzz and street singles
Lil Jon killin the pop and international scene with Pitbull & AkonNO
not to mention
Drumma Boy
Bangladesh
Toomp
Cannon
JD
still behind the scenes
+ the ATL underground...Pill, Yelawolf, MumsFP, Young Lyxx...Originally Posted by PleaseSayTheBaby23
who ever said ATLANTA is on there last leg![]()
![]()
![]()
SLAP UR SELF
T.I. next album will be classic and will shut the game down
Jeezy gonna give the dboys what they want with 103
Usher......well Usher do what Usher do
Outkast suppose to do there solo's then drop another Kast album
Luda killin the rap/pop scene with Battle Of The Sexes
Soulja Boy, Yung LA, J Money, Travis Porter, Flacka will always have a current club banger
The Dream....same with Usher...The Dream is The Dream
Gucci gonna stay with some buzz and street singles
Lil Jon killin the pop and international scene with Pitbull & Akon
not to mention
Drumma Boy
Bangladesh
Toomp
Cannon
JD
still behind the scenes
Well that's the way u see it. however,Originally Posted by Mrsouthernhospitality
Originally Posted by Dathbgboy
It aint got nothin do w/ puttin Hip Hop in a one-dimensional box. U gotta look at the difference between those two songs u mentioned. One is sayin Stanky Leg this and that, we know what dance u doin, now what else u got to tell us? nothin. Oh, that's right, ur bro is doin the stanky leg too, that's some new infoOriginally Posted by Mrsouthernhospitality
why is it so wrong to make a song about a dance it all fall in the same category to me for example stanky leg and lets say low by flo-rida would be looked at as a dance song even though stanky leg is actually a dance nobody would look at it any different and the same dudes would be #@!%$@^ about it I hate when dudes put hip hop music in a little one dimensional box this is the only genre of music where cats #@!$ about the most stupidest $#!%Originally Posted by Dathbgboy
It's one thing to make music to dance to, it's another to make music about a dance. I personally hate all that @$%#. Dudes really have no creativity. The name of the song is about a dance, the name of the dance is mentioned in the verses 3+ timesOriginally Posted by Mrsouthernhospitality
I agree with wacka on his response some dudes only want hip hop to be one dimensional and I know wu tang got history and all that but what you call hip hop is not law homie and there is no reason to blame the fans for it for the simple reason they are fans there the people that buy the music because they like it and what really kills me about these type of comments about some hip hop� http://www.youtube.com/v/HGj1RvOo-2g?f=videos&app=youtube_gdatahttp://www.youtube.com/v/HGj1RvOo-2g?f=videos&app=youtube_gdata http://www.youtube.com/v/HGj1RvOo-2g?f=videos&app=youtube_gdatahttp://www.youtube.com/v/HGj1RvOo-2g?f=videos&app=youtube_gdata http://www.youtube.com/v/HGj1RvOo-2g?f=videos&app=youtube_gdatahttp://www.youtube.com/v/HGj1RvOo-2g?f=videos&app=youtube_gdata being dance music like they weren't dancing in the rappers delight video.![]()
Yea, it's all in fun, but at what point do u change it up and rap about somethin w/ substance? And no how many bricks u flip aint substance.� And I'm not even talkin bout the South, I'm talkin bout that type of music in general.
U kno, that's the first thing that came to mind when I first heard this interview. I understand dudes are certified legends in the game, no denyin that, but at the same time they grown !%% men and get all butt hurt when somebody who is clearly on his @$%# right now says that if they were to battle in this day that he would win. I honestly lost respect for dude after this. I still like em as artists but that's just sadOriginally Posted by youngjordan23
So these dudes could disrespect a region but its blasphemy for joe budden to speak on them
. Flo-Rida, though wasn't on no knowledge kickin $$##, which it shouldn't be since it's a dance/club song, was actually rappin within context. Like I said there's a difference between songs for dance and songs about a dance.![]()
![]()
no bro I see both of those songs in the same light nether had any context they are strictly songs for the club even if one is about a dance in itself its the same thing to me and why would these artist need to switch it up for if they only want to make music to dance to i dont see anybody saying that lupe need to switch it up and make a club song to get on the radio let them folks stay in there lane and do them and most of the time the rappers that people say have context in there music really dont be talking about $#!% you just like the lyrics![]()
Your right, we should be going 9+ pages on they're music, but if theywere as irrelevant as some are suggesting, this thread would'nt havemade it past 2 pages.Originally Posted by rocyaice
But why are we talking about the Wu for 9 pages? Because of their music or because they said some outlandish $+@ to stay relevant again? We should be making 9 pages about their album. Instead they haven't dropped a hot album collectively since the mid 90's.Originally Posted by SEND ONE
So because collectively they havent made a good album in a minute, we should dismiss everything they've done? Or anything that any legend who hasnt made good or any music in recent years should be dismissed? And saying that only "elitists and old heads" listen to Wu, is like me saying only youngins and idiots listen to Waka.....foolish aint it? No one talks about Wu in 2010 but here we are 9 pages later......still talking.Originally Posted by rocyaice
Seriously. Nobody talks about Wu right now except elitists and old heads who don't want to live in 2010 but want to stay in 1997. Wu isn't relevant right now because they don't drop good music anymore as a group. We're to the point now where Raekwon drops a decent album and everyoen overhypes it because its been a minute since the Wu has dropped a significant banger. Them dudes are bitter that solo wise they can't pack a show like a one hit wonder can right now. That's alright. No need to be bitter at these rappers. Be bitter at your fans. Be bitter at hip hop fans. We're the ones supporting these one hit wonders.
We shouldn't dismiss anything Wu has done. But if you're going to judge these young n's in the game you better be supplying classic $+@ yourself and IMO Wu ain't doing that. If you're an old head still making music you don't have a right to say $+@ if that music is garbage.
And I never ONCE said that the only people that listen to Wu Tang are elitists and old heads. Where did you get that from?
Originally Posted by rocyaice
Seriously. Nobody talks about Wu right now except elitists and old heads who don't want to live in 2010 but want to stay in 1997. Wu isn't relevant right now because they don't drop good music anymore as a group. We're to the point now where Raekwon drops a decent album and everyoen overhypes it because its been a minute since the Wu has dropped a significant banger. Them dudes are bitter that solo wise they can't pack a show like a one hit wonder can right now. That's alright. No need to be bitter at these rappers. Be bitter at your fans. Be bitter at hip hop fans. We're the ones supporting these one hit wonders.Originally Posted by OptimusPrimeAPhiA
actually...with time...you can't really judge that...you can't tell me people in Atlanta will remember Wu Tang over So Icey 15 years from now...Originally Posted by NostrandAve68
At the end of the day whose music will be remember and appreciated years from now Wu or So Icey. Thats why I don't even engage in these arguments anymore.
Like forreal do you hear people bumping or talking about Ying Yang Twinz or Trillville in 2010 or old OB4CL, Forever and etc.. disposable music fades out so It doesn't bother me as much anymore.
1) That's a Rae album not a Wu albumOriginally Posted by Harlem On The Rise
What makes them not relevent ANYmore??
If I recall correctly Raekwon's last album was rated top 10 by Time magazine, received rave reviews from damn near every magazine, and sold pretty well for an independent album...
Rae pushed 68K his first week & debuted Top 5 ... Gucci did 89K debut @ #10
Yeait would've. Its not 9 pages because of Wu. Its 9 pages because of the%$@ they said. If Kool Mo Dee said Jay-Z was garbage that %$@ would be10+ pages as well.Originally Posted by SEND ONE
Your right, we should be going 9+ pages on they're music, but if theywere as irrelevant as some are suggesting, this thread would'nt havemade it past 2 pages.Originally Posted by rocyaice
But why arewe talking about the Wu for 9 pages? Because of their music or becausethey said some outlandish $+@ to stay relevant again? We should bemaking 9 pages about their album. Instead they haven't dropped a hotalbum collectively since the mid 90's.Originally Posted by SEND ONE
So because collectively they havent made agood album in a minute, we should dismiss everything they've done? Oranything that any legend who hasnt made good or any music in recentyears should be dismissed? And saying that only "elitists and oldheads" listen to Wu, is like me saying only youngins and idiots listento Waka.....foolish aint it? No one talks about Wu in 2010 but here weare 9 pages later......still talking.Originally Posted by rocyaice
Seriously. Nobody talks about Wu right now except elitists and old headswho don't want to live in 2010 but want to stay in 1997. Wu isn'trelevant right now because they don't drop good music anymore as agroup. We're to the point now where Raekwon drops a decent album andeveryoen overhypes it because its been a minute since the Wu hasdropped a significant banger. Them dudes are bitter that solo wise theycan't pack a show like a one hit wonder can right now. That's alright.No need to be bitter at these rappers. Be bitter at your fans. Bebitter at hip hop fans. We're the ones supporting these one hitwonders.
We shouldn't dismissanything Wu has done. But if you're going to judge these young n's inthe game you better be supplying classic $+@ yourself and IMO Wu ain'tdoing that. If you're an old head still making music you don't have aright to say $+@ if that music is garbage.
And I never ONCE said that the only people that listen to Wu Tang are elitists and old heads. Where did you get that from?
I meant to type "talks", but it wound'nt have made a difference. It still would be false.
Originally Posted by SEND ONE
Your right, we should be going 9+ pages on they're music, but if theywere as irrelevant as some are suggesting, this thread would'nt havemade it past 2 pages.Originally Posted by rocyaice
But why are we talking about the Wu for 9 pages? Because of their music or because they said some outlandish $+@ to stay relevant again? We should be making 9 pages about their album. Instead they haven't dropped a hot album collectively since the mid 90's.Originally Posted by SEND ONE
So because collectively they havent made a good album in a minute, we should dismiss everything they've done? Or anything that any legend who hasnt made good or any music in recent years should be dismissed? And saying that only "elitists and old heads" listen to Wu, is like me saying only youngins and idiots listen to Waka.....foolish aint it? No one talks about Wu in 2010 but here we are 9 pages later......still talking.Originally Posted by rocyaice
Seriously. Nobody talks about Wu right now except elitists and old heads who don't want to live in 2010 but want to stay in 1997. Wu isn't relevant right now because they don't drop good music anymore as a group. We're to the point now where Raekwon drops a decent album and everyoen overhypes it because its been a minute since the Wu has dropped a significant banger. Them dudes are bitter that solo wise they can't pack a show like a one hit wonder can right now. That's alright. No need to be bitter at these rappers. Be bitter at your fans. Be bitter at hip hop fans. We're the ones supporting these one hit wonders.
We shouldn't dismiss anything Wu has done. But if you're going to judge these young n's in the game you better be supplying classic $+@ yourself and IMO Wu ain't doing that. If you're an old head still making music you don't have a right to say $+@ if that music is garbage.
And I never ONCE said that the only people that listen to Wu Tang are elitists and old heads. Where did you get that from?
I meant to type "talks", but it wound'nt have made a difference. It still would be false.
Originally Posted by ScottHallWithAPick
Originally Posted by SEND ONE
Your right, we should be going 9+ pages on they're music, but if theywere as irrelevant as some are suggesting, this thread would'nt havemade it past 2 pages.Originally Posted by rocyaice
But why are we talking about the Wu for 9 pages? Because of their music or because they said some outlandish $+@ to stay relevant again? We should be making 9 pages about their album. Instead they haven't dropped a hot album collectively since the mid 90's.Originally Posted by SEND ONE
So because collectively they havent made a good album in a minute, we should dismiss everything they've done? Or anything that any legend who hasnt made good or any music in recent years should be dismissed? And saying that only "elitists and old heads" listen to Wu, is like me saying only youngins and idiots listen to Waka.....foolish aint it? No one talks about Wu in 2010 but here we are 9 pages later......still talking.Originally Posted by rocyaice
Seriously. Nobody talks about Wu right now except elitists and old heads who don't want to live in 2010 but want to stay in 1997. Wu isn't relevant right now because they don't drop good music anymore as a group. We're to the point now where Raekwon drops a decent album and everyoen overhypes it because its been a minute since the Wu has dropped a significant banger. Them dudes are bitter that solo wise they can't pack a show like a one hit wonder can right now. That's alright. No need to be bitter at these rappers. Be bitter at your fans. Be bitter at hip hop fans. We're the ones supporting these one hit wonders.
We shouldn't dismiss anything Wu has done. But if you're going to judge these young n's in the game you better be supplying classic $+@ yourself and IMO Wu ain't doing that. If you're an old head still making music you don't have a right to say $+@ if that music is garbage.
And I never ONCE said that the only people that listen to Wu Tang are elitists and old heads. Where did you get that from?
I meant to type "talks", but it wound'nt have made a difference. It still would be false.![]()