RustyShackleford
Supporter
- 63,687
- 190,992
- Joined
- Jul 20, 2009
[if IE]><embed src="" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="640" height="390" /><![endif]
Thanks for the recommendation brah, I being sincerely too.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
[if IE]><embed src="" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="640" height="390" /><![endif]
You can't really speak on majority of people's status that are on welfare, because you haven't heard their personal stories to know what they went through to get to that point. People that say all of these people in this same situation all have the same story don't understand that we are not the same. We all take different routes to our situation even though we ended up in the same place.Yea, you're right, some of those people on welfare worked hard and got screwed. However a lot of them didn't so I, myself wouldn't have any sympathy for them as well.
No matter how you slice it, many people below the poverty line and on welfare are looking for government handouts - some aren't.
I agree that the American Dream has definitely changed, you can't make as much money as you used to. Although I'm a believer in hard work and education. If you start off young and take school seriously and work hard you will be fine. You may not be a millionaire but for damn sure you won't be close to the poverty line.
Whoa there, Why can't I but why can you?You can't really speak on majority of people's status that are on welfare, because you haven't heard their personal stories to know what they went through to get to that point. People that say all of these people in this same situation all have the same story don't understand that we are not the same. We all take different routes to our situation even though we ended up in the same place.
I think the one's of the new age welfare are the able bodied people that take advantage of the government, but does that mean we should punish those that did everything right and still came up short? Does that seem right to you? Instead they should start a berage of free government training, and place stricker regulations on welfare. But the Romney's of the country don't want to teach theset young people how to fish their way out of poverty. Otherwise a welfare program like this for the younger able bodies would've been in affect in the 90's. I really think they enjoy the idea of having the potiental power of saying who can and can't eat.
Back in the day the message was you can also succeed with out a college education. We were thriving then with plenty of entry level American opportunities before the brite idea of outsourcing created by the Romney's of the world.
But the Romney's of the country don't want to teach theset young people how to fish their way out of poverty. Otherwise a welfare program like this for the younger able bodies would've been in affect in the 90's. I really think they enjoy the idea of having the potiental power of saying who can and can't eat.
Let’s set aside the question of whether this is what Mitt Romney really believes deep down in his heart. Maybe this is what he thinks. Or maybe he just thought it was a good line to buck up jittery donors. What we can say is that the last part is wrong. There is no fair accounting in which 47 percent of Americans take no “personal responsibility and care for their lives.” Take this simple breakdown from the Tax Policy Center of what households paid in taxes in 2011:"There are 47 percent of the people who will vote for the president no matter what. All right, there are 47 percent who are with him, who are dependent upon government, who believe that they are victims, who believe the government has a responsibility to care for them, who believe that they are entitled to health care, to food, to housing, to you-name-it. That that’s an entitlement. And the government should give it to them. And they will vote for this president no matter what …"
"These are people who pay no income tax. 47 percent of Americans pay no income tax. So our message of low taxes doesn’t connect… my job is not to worry about those people. I’ll never convince them that they should take personal responsibility and care for their lives."
Except that his numbers were wrong?I don't see anything wrong with what he said. It is what it is
I posted the article on the first page.still trying to see where Romney said something that wasn't true in the first video, if you find it let me know?
Future care to provide us with the right numbers then?
Except that his numbers were wrong?
No I think he is referring to the people in the Youtube video called Obamabucks check it out.So basically he's calling single moms (head of household filing status) making about $37,500 with 2 kids (2 x Child tax credits) a bunch of free loading Americans because they don't pay any taxes. So if this single mother loses her job, she is not entitled to food stamps? Section 8 housing? Medicaid?
This Romney guy is something else!
Nothing he does will make him innately lose because the people that reported this are channels that his base doesn't utilize.Thanks for the videos and the clear up FutureMD.
Whether the numbers are right or wrong tho doesn't matter. Mitt Romney just lost the campaign. I don't have a big problem with what he said but the news and Independents (which he needs) are not going to side with him at all for this.
You call it extremism I call it compassion for those who came up short and those don't know any better. What do you say to the young pupil that has a mom strung out and on welfare. All they've every seen and known is drugs, murder. prostitution, rats/roaches, etc. If there is no one around at all to tell you that you can rise above this, and you've never even known anybody that went to college what kind of mentality do you think you would have?Whoa there, Why can't I but why can you?
This is why I can't stand complete Left-wingers just as much as I can't stand complete Right-wingers.
1) Romney is not suppose to teach you anything. Thats up to your parental situations, education, and whomever you can learn from along your way.
2) Saying that that Romney and his counterparts actually enjoy watching people in poverty and can't eat is ridiculous.
3) Another welfare program would help? How so? And why? Give details. What kind of program? Don't try to shoot being vague.
The bias extremists have from both parties is astonishing.
People in his base would vote for Romney regardless when they see this. Like Romney said, it's the Independents that matter. Most Independents will hear about this and be extremely disappointed.Nothing he does will make him innately lose because the people that reported this are channels that his base doesn't utilize.
The only way he'll lose is if Fox News or people his base listen to, report this stuff.
Otherwise its just liberal-pornography.
Nice try brah, I'm not gonna get caught up with your circle jerking/trolling. Show me a video of Obama saying something similar about the Republican base.Wait, Obama doesn't do that? Oh...
Every politician does that, Not just Romney.
poor lyndon johnson rollin over his graveI consider myself Independent, lean towards the left, registered Democrat, and I will most likely vote for Obama (again).
However I see no problem with what Mitt Romney said. I'm sure the other 47% of voters are conservative so that leaves around 6% of Independent voters. That makes absolute sense. Whats the issue? I'm sure not all of the 47% of democratic voters are looking for government care but I sure bet most of them are.
fox just covering da middle east warfare...aka their pornNothing he does will make him innately lose because the people that reported this are channels that his base doesn't utilize.Thanks for the videos and the clear up FutureMD.
Whether the numbers are right or wrong tho doesn't matter. Mitt Romney just lost the campaign. I don't have a big problem with what he said but the news and Independents (which he needs) are not going to side with him at all for this.
The only way he'll lose is if Fox News or people his base listen to, report this stuff.
Otherwise its just liberal-pornography.