- 16,431
- 2,119
- Joined
- May 12, 2002
McGee for 2 - ok
McGee & 6 for 2?? - Hell nah if I'm the Wiz
McGee & 6 for 2?? - Hell nah if I'm the Wiz
NBA Draft Thread 2011
- Thread in 'Sports & Training' Thread starter Started by al3xis,
- Start date
- 6,662
- 1,311
- Joined
- Mar 8, 2008
LAC and PHI have discussed Iggy for Kaman
- 6,662
- 1,311
- Joined
- Mar 8, 2008
LAC and PHI have discussed Iggy for Kaman
- 2,041
- 75
- Joined
- Oct 4, 2010
This trade makes a little more sense than trading an oversized 2 guard for an undersized one.
Still you're trading away a good player for one who hasn't been healthy for the past couple seasons and probably won't ever return back to his All-Star form.
|A-Man|
formerly atgd7154xbbxmz
- 17,340
- 2,011
- Joined
- Jan 5, 2011
If Minny throws in Beasely I think that'd be fair. That way Minny can possibly draft a forward @ 6.
Getting Beasely and Kanter to play with Wall is a come up. I aint sure about Darko and McGee as Minny's centers though.
Most of these Iggy deals are a wash. Aint making either team that much better. LAC gets slightly better defensively and PHI gets bigger (if they keep Hawes).
Getting Beasely and Kanter to play with Wall is a come up. I aint sure about Darko and McGee as Minny's centers though.
Most of these Iggy deals are a wash. Aint making either team that much better. LAC gets slightly better defensively and PHI gets bigger (if they keep Hawes).
|A-Man|
formerly atgd7154xbbxmz
- 17,340
- 2,011
- Joined
- Jan 5, 2011
If Minny throws in Beasely I think that'd be fair. That way Minny can possibly draft a forward @ 6.
Getting Beasely and Kanter to play with Wall is a come up. I aint sure about Darko and McGee as Minny's centers though.
Most of these Iggy deals are a wash. Aint making either team that much better. LAC gets slightly better defensively and PHI gets bigger (if they keep Hawes).
Getting Beasely and Kanter to play with Wall is a come up. I aint sure about Darko and McGee as Minny's centers though.
Most of these Iggy deals are a wash. Aint making either team that much better. LAC gets slightly better defensively and PHI gets bigger (if they keep Hawes).
- 2,041
- 75
- Joined
- Oct 4, 2010
This trade makes a little more sense than trading an oversized 2 guard for an undersized one.
Still you're trading away a good player for one who hasn't been healthy for the past couple seasons and probably won't ever return back to his All-Star form.
- 5,456
- 11
- Joined
- Aug 12, 2008
Philly is a tough spot right now. Their two best players last year (Iggy and Brand) have to win now so the 76ers can't re-build around them. Trading Kaman (not exactly young) doesn't really help in the re-building process or winning now since they lose Iggy. The trade helps the Clippers no doubt tho.
- 5,456
- 11
- Joined
- Aug 12, 2008
Philly is a tough spot right now. Their two best players last year (Iggy and Brand) have to win now so the 76ers can't re-build around them. Trading Kaman (not exactly young) doesn't really help in the re-building process or winning now since they lose Iggy. The trade helps the Clippers no doubt tho.
Ok, now we talkin. That's a good deal for both clubs imo. Wiz need plenty of help, sure, but getting Wall and Williams locked in young and building around them is a smart play.
And Minny makes out too getting Javele, and 2 decent picks to keep adding to their core.
Neither club is doing anything for a couple years so they need to make deals like this to get the peices needed for 20__ whatever year that is reasonable. 2014, 2015, what have you.
Ok, now we talkin. That's a good deal for both clubs imo. Wiz need plenty of help, sure, but getting Wall and Williams locked in young and building around them is a smart play.
And Minny makes out too getting Javele, and 2 decent picks to keep adding to their core.
Neither club is doing anything for a couple years so they need to make deals like this to get the peices needed for 20__ whatever year that is reasonable. 2014, 2015, what have you.
- 21,151
- 37
- Joined
- Mar 13, 2004
I dunno man...that seems a bit steep for only the #2. I'd have to see what else Minnesota would include. Can you imagine Beasley + Blatche on the same roster???
If they can somehow convince Kahn to do the #2 for McGee straight up...well, that's an offer that might be hard to refuse. Shoot, I'd even consider McGee + #18 for the #2....but throwing in the #6 is too much IMO.
- 21,151
- 37
- Joined
- Mar 13, 2004
I dunno man...that seems a bit steep for only the #2. I'd have to see what else Minnesota would include. Can you imagine Beasley + Blatche on the same roster???
If they can somehow convince Kahn to do the #2 for McGee straight up...well, that's an offer that might be hard to refuse. Shoot, I'd even consider McGee + #18 for the #2....but throwing in the #6 is too much IMO.
mr marcus
Banned
- 26,572
- 5,415
- Joined
- May 3, 2010
mr marcus
Banned
- 26,572
- 5,415
- Joined
- May 3, 2010
Originally Posted by DoubleJs07
I dunno man...that seems a bit steep for only the #2. I'd have to see what else Minnesota would include. Can you imagine Beasley + Blatche on the same roster???
If they can somehow convince Kahn to do the #2 for McGee straight up...well, that's an offer that might be hard to refuse. Shoot, I'd even consider McGee + #18 for the #2....but throwing in the #6 is too much IMO.
If you want to be great, you have to take chances. If Will and Wall are those type guys, you can't not do it.
You want to be eh, ok, then yeah, keep your pieces as is, maybe hit a second round, and Wall will leave in a few years to win somewhere that has balls to go all in.
OKC got started once they had Durant and Russ. The rest falls into place. Wall and Will could be that type of talent, the rest will fall into place.
Originally Posted by DoubleJs07
I dunno man...that seems a bit steep for only the #2. I'd have to see what else Minnesota would include. Can you imagine Beasley + Blatche on the same roster???
If they can somehow convince Kahn to do the #2 for McGee straight up...well, that's an offer that might be hard to refuse. Shoot, I'd even consider McGee + #18 for the #2....but throwing in the #6 is too much IMO.
If you want to be great, you have to take chances. If Will and Wall are those type guys, you can't not do it.
You want to be eh, ok, then yeah, keep your pieces as is, maybe hit a second round, and Wall will leave in a few years to win somewhere that has balls to go all in.
OKC got started once they had Durant and Russ. The rest falls into place. Wall and Will could be that type of talent, the rest will fall into place.
jpzx
Supporter
- 56,491
- 26,223
- Joined
- Feb 7, 2008
McGee for the #2?
I'd rather hug a cactus a thousand times over than do the #2 for McGee/#6/#18.
jpzx
Supporter
- 56,491
- 26,223
- Joined
- Feb 7, 2008
McGee for the #2?
I'd rather hug a cactus a thousand times over than do the #2 for McGee/#6/#18.
- 21,151
- 37
- Joined
- Mar 13, 2004
Originally Posted by JPZx
McGee for the #2?
I'd rather hug a cactus a thousand times over than do the #2 for McGee/#6/#18.
I think that's a great move for the T-Wolves....why do you think it's so bad?
CP....Williams is a solid player, but I can't see him and Wall having the type of impact that Russ/KD do in OKC. That's a lot to give up (assuming they don't get any players in return)
*Allen...I forgot what you said, but did you say you think Williams projects better as a 3 or a 4?
- 21,151
- 37
- Joined
- Mar 13, 2004
Originally Posted by JPZx
McGee for the #2?
I'd rather hug a cactus a thousand times over than do the #2 for McGee/#6/#18.
I think that's a great move for the T-Wolves....why do you think it's so bad?
CP....Williams is a solid player, but I can't see him and Wall having the type of impact that Russ/KD do in OKC. That's a lot to give up (assuming they don't get any players in return)
*Allen...I forgot what you said, but did you say you think Williams projects better as a 3 or a 4?
- 25,476
- 650
- Joined
- Sep 1, 2004
if you want to pick kanter with the 2nd pick why would you not give up Mcgee?
im not high on Mcgee like some of you. he seems like one of those players that will never get.
cant blatche run center if you want to draft williams and play him at PF?
im not high on Mcgee like some of you. he seems like one of those players that will never get.
cant blatche run center if you want to draft williams and play him at PF?
- 25,476
- 650
- Joined
- Sep 1, 2004
if you want to pick kanter with the 2nd pick why would you not give up Mcgee?
im not high on Mcgee like some of you. he seems like one of those players that will never get.
cant blatche run center if you want to draft williams and play him at PF?
im not high on Mcgee like some of you. he seems like one of those players that will never get.
cant blatche run center if you want to draft williams and play him at PF?
- 12,102
- 1,410
- Joined
- Jan 3, 2008
I do not believe he has any chance of being a 3 in the NBA.
4 all the way.
4 all the way.
- 12,102
- 1,410
- Joined
- Jan 3, 2008
I do not believe he has any chance of being a 3 in the NBA.
4 all the way.
4 all the way.