- 3,948
- 731
pums
i get you...your og statement makes a lot more sense in 2016, the way teams are playing....but still, there's always a need for bodies banging in the painted area and idk if Bron is about that life
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I respectfully disagree.
Duncan was every bit as dominant as Bron. If not more. And more consistentThese are Duncan's stats and accolades from 97-07
22ppg 12rpg 3apg 2.5bpg
4 Championships
3 Finals MVPS
2 Back to Back MVPS
The only reason Duncan wasn't the "undisputed best player in his era"...is because he played with SHAQ..... Who you are making "assumptions" on his leadership ability.
When you look at the results and impact Duncan and Shaq had....its up there.
Them being big men....and not being flashy clouds some peoples judgment.
pums i get you...your og statement makes a lot more sense in 2016, the way teams are playing....but still, there's always a need for bodies banging in the painted area and idk if Bron is about that life
Positions overrated b
The he can't play the 1-5 he can just play
CP loves position discussions...what's your take?
I respectfully disagree.
Duncan was every bit as dominant as Bron. If not more. And more consistentThese are Duncan's stats and accolades from 97-07
22ppg 12rpg 3apg 2.5bpg
4 Championships
3 Finals MVPS
2 Back to Back MVPS
The only reason Duncan wasn't the "undisputed best player in his era"...is because he played with SHAQ..... Who you are making "assumptions" on his leadership ability.
When you look at the results and impact Duncan and Shaq had....its up there.
Them being big men....and not being flashy clouds some peoples judgment.
Yea it's splitting hairs I'm not even gonna look this up cause I'm on mobile but from 2006-2016 Lebby probably averaged something like 27 / 7 /7 with a block and a steal mixed in there
He had 4 mvps
3chips
3 finals mvps
Those are on par with timmys achievements
Well I mean Phil Jackson said Shaq went to practice but naked except for some socks and sneakers so there's that and he didn't look focus for large parts of the season
CP
*Rock clap gif*
They never want to put respeck on Bean's name. Dude was a beast for 15 years, how many others can say that? Kareem? Bron maybe in a couple years? That's it. Top 5 player if you don't want to say he was ever the best in the league (which is false) for 15 years.
points per game.
How would we judge players without that amazing sophisticated statistic?
I know, it's antiquated now, I know. Still, we throwin "dominant" out for 22 and 12's, then get Zach Randolph talk started in here. Let's start including Dwight Howard and his 22 and 12's as a top 10 All Time guy.
Surely that is over the top, I know he's better than they are, but if we're going to split these hairs with the immortals, things like that will come up. No back to backs, "dominant" 22 and 12's while other guys throw 40 and 7's at you. Or 30 and 6, etc.
Shaq was dominant with 30 and 12. 22 and 12 is supposed to move me? Why? I'm honestly asking you, why am I supposed to not bring these type of things up?
I know, it's antiquated now, I know. Still, we throwin "dominant" out for 22 and 12's, then get Zach Randolph talk started in here. Let's start including Dwight Howard and his 22 and 12's as a top 10 All Time guy.
Surely that is over the top, I know he's better than they are, but if we're going to split these hairs with the immortals, things like that will come up. No back to backs, "dominant" 22 and 12's while other guys throw 40 and 7's at you. Or 30 and 6, etc.
Shaq was dominant with 30 and 12. 22 and 12 is supposed to move me? Why? I'm honestly asking you, why am I supposed to not bring these type of things up?
Tim Duncan in his prime was probably not as good an offensive player as Kobe, or Chuck, or Dirk, or Karl Malone or **** David Robinson.
Tim Duncan's "domination" comes from being an elite two way player so that's probably why no ones looking at his no 26 ppg as some black mark. He was a top 5 defender ever maybe top 2.
Kobe, Bron, Kareem, MJ, weren't dominant two way players?
Tim Duncan in his prime was probably not as good an offensive player as Kobe, or Chuck, or Dirk, or Karl Malone or **** David Robinson.
Tim Duncan's "domination" comes from being an elite two way player so that's probably why no ones looking at his no 26 ppg as some black mark. He was a top 5 defender ever maybe top 2.
I think everybody here has Kobe as a consensus top 7 player. He's right behind Duncan and Shaq to me. It's splitting hairs. Duncan and Shaq were beast for the same time period. Let's not forget Shaq came in the league in 92....and won his last chip in 06 averaging 20 & 9. Let's not forget Duncan came in the league in 97....and was first team ALL NBA in 2013...and won his last chip in 2014 as an all star.
There a reason I group Kobe, Shaq and Duncan together. To me, they are the next 3 greatest players aver Mike, Magic, Kareem and Bill.
Personally, I don't see anybody touching Mike, Kareem, Magic and Bill.
Those guys fit all the criteria for GOAT. Consistency, longevity, rings, MVPS, stats, individual accolades etc. 5-10 is debatable.
What about 2008-2012 for Duncan? 2008-All NBA 2nd team/defensive 1st
2009-All NBA 2nd team/defensive 1st
2010-All NBA 3rd team/defensive 2nd
2011 & 2012-No ALL NBA team or All NBA defensive team
During that same period Kobe and Bron were all NBA 1st team every single year and all 1st team defense 4 outta the 5 years.
Only time Dirk has been better than Kobe is when Kobe started getting hurt the last few years. DWade was never better than Kobe. Love KG but nah. Maybe in 04. Lebron is the only one that a good argument could be made for. It was close during that time but I'll still go with Kobe.
Those are great shooting numbers. He was a great scorer but that's it. He could get 8 or 9 rebounds but he 7 feet he should.
Since when has being a great scorer, 6th all time on the scoring list, 50-40-90 club member, League MVP, Finals MVP....not been a great player. KG was a better two way player....but he wasn't an actual better player than Dirk...or had the better career.
It may just be preference with you. Seems to me like you value "all around" players more. I value players that make a huge impact, and contribute to winning consistently. They can have faults in certain areas. See magic defensively.
That's why I'm Dirk > KG. I would say '04 KG had one of the best individual seasons in recent memory though. But what Dirk did in 2011....sealed it for me. That was historical.