- 2,670
- 10
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Originally Posted by CP1708
And Stein reports the Blazers offered Odom a 5/40 contract........yeah? How's that? Convince Stern to get rid of the salary cap? They have no money to offer. Stupid idiot.
Originally Posted by JDB1523
@ MIL nearing the luxury tax...for what again?
Isn't the road thru the west Route 66 ?Originally Posted by CP1708
LMAO ot the road to the west goes thru San Antonio from a few pages back.
Those dudes can't ever beat us. 1 time this decade.
Originally Posted by UCLAMIKE
Originally Posted by CP1708
And Stein reports the Blazers offered Odom a 5/40 contract........yeah? How's that? Convince Stern to get rid of the salary cap? They have no money to offer. Stupid idiot.
the offer could of come before they signed miller
and Stein and Bucher only reported the wade meeting odom because wade said it on twitter just like everyone else reported it off of that
Originally Posted by heat23
YahooSportsNBAThe Knicks have been granted an exclusive five day window to negotiate a deal with free agent Jason Williams, league memo says16 minutes ago from mobile web
http://twitter.com/YahooSportsNBAhttp://twitterhelp.blogspot.com/2008/05/twitter-via-mobile-web-mtwittercom.html
About what's better, being cheap as hell or being in luxury tax hell?Originally Posted by Julian Wright
Wow I could've sworn ESPN said the Hornets and Grizz were talking.
Awhile ago. Maybe we're just trying to get rid of Hilton for a salary dump and I was high or something.Originally Posted by bhzmafia14
About what's better, being cheap as hell or being in luxury tax hell?Originally Posted by Julian Wright
Wow I could've sworn ESPN said the Hornets and Grizz were talking.
When did you hear that?
Updated: July 31, 2009, 3:43 PM ET
[h2]Sources: Knicks win Williams rights[/h2]By Marc Stein
ESPN.com
Archive
The New York Knicks have been awarded exclusive rights to negotiate with veteran guard Jason Williams through Aug. 6 after putting in a waiver claim Friday, according to NBA front-office sources.
All 30 teams were notified Friday that the Knicks will have five business days, until next Thursday, to offer Williams a contract. Without an offer in that time frame that meets league guidelines, Williams would then become an unrestricted free agent.
It is believed that the Knicks' pursuit of Williams is separate from their well-chronicled interest in Milwaukee Bucks restricted free agent Ramon Sessions, who is soon expected to sign an offer sheet with the Knicks.
The Los Angeles Clippers formally waived their exclusive rights to negotiate with Williams last Friday. He was then placed on waivers, giving any team the right by Friday to claim Williams and secure the exclusive negotiating rights that the Clippers surrendered.
L.A. faced a league deadline last Thursday to exercise those exclusive rights to re-sign Williams after the 33-year signed a one-year deal with the Clippers last August, only to decide in September to place himself on the league's voluntarily retired list to spend more time with his family.
In February, Williams' request to be immediately reinstated by the NBA was denied by a vote of 24 teams to six. League bylaws state that players wishing to return from the official voluntarily retired list need unanimous approval from all 30 teams to avoid a one-year mandatory waiting period, ostensibly so the league can discourage players from backing out of signed contracts to choose a new team.
Williams becomes eligible to play in exhibition, regular-season and playoff games on the one-year anniversary of his official retirement, which is Sept. 26.
In February, his agent, Dan Tobin, said the 10-year veteran was determined to come back in spite of the ruling that prevented Williams from latching on with a contender late last season.
"We anticipated this decision," Tobin said then. "So did Jason. But we look forward to seeing Jason back in the NBA in the 2009-10 season.
"One of the reasons we applied for reinstatement now was that we'd like to try to accelerate the process of him coming back."
The six teams that voted against letting Williams return last season were Atlanta, Chicago, Houston, Minnesota, San Antonio and the Clippers themselves. One suggested motivation for teams blocking Williams' return was an assumption that he would have quickly parted ways with the Clippers after reinstatement and signed with a playoff contender for the stretch run.
After signing a one-year deal with the Clippers in August, Williams abruptly changed his mind in September, informed the team that he was prepared to forfeit his contract and promptly filed retirement papers with the league.
In 679 regular-season games, Williams averaged 11.4 points, 6.3 assists and 2.4 rebounds while playing for Sacramento, Memphis and Miami. He has appeared in 53 playoff games, averaging 9.8 points, 3.7 assists and 2.2 rebounds and helping the Heat win its first and only championship in 2006.
He was drafted by Sacramento in 1998 following his junior year at Florida and was named to the 1999 NBA All-Rookie Team after averaging 12.8 points and 6.0 assists. He quickly became one of the most popular players in the Kings' Sacramento history, in tandem with Chris Webber.
Williams was dealt to Memphis in a trade featuring Mike Bibby before the 2001-02 season. Over the next four seasons he became the Grizzlies' career leader in assists and 3-point attempts. He joined the Heat before the 2005-06 season, as part of a trade which initially drew considerable criticism. But Williams and Antoine Walker helped Shaquille O'Neal, Dwyane Wade and Pat Riley win a championship in the newcomers' first season in Miami.
Williams' request to be reinstated has been described as unchartered territory because a player walking away from an active contract is so uncommon.
"My wife was pregnant at the time and it wasn't going too smoothly," Williams said in June of his sudden retirement in an interview with the Charleston (W.Va.) Daily Mail. "I just thought it was the right decision for my family.
"I'm just so blessed to have three healthy kids. It was tough [last season] because I missed playing, but I was glad to be home with my family."
Williams also told the newspaper that he would "like to play two or three more years" but insisted that "if it doesn't happen, trust me, I won't lose any sleep."
Marc Stein is a senior NBA writer for ESPN.com.
And really? These guys have a job to report off twitter? Then I guess you and I are reporters too, because we can read something and then "report" it right?
They are REPORTERS, they are suppossed to know what they are talking about and speak on it, if they didn't know for an absoulte I need to read NikeTalk's rules. that Wade and Riles was meeting, then they shouldn't say @#$%. They're bums, stop defending them
I highly agree. Real journalism has long BEEN dead my friend, trust it goes waaay further than just sports "reporters".
People using twitter as a reputable source
he shoulda went to the Cavs when he had the chanceOriginally Posted by KingJay718
If I'm Michael Redd, I'd demand a trade out of Milwaukee. They've failed to surround this dude with quality talent, since he re-upped with them.
What's wrong with reporting something off an athlete's twitter? As long as the twitter account is confirmed it's as good as an actualquote, provided that the reporter points out that his source was a tweet. If it's inaccurate, so be it, athletes and front office people lie all the timein interviews. Hopefully the reporter will dig deeper and confirm the information from the tweet with someone else but that's not always an option in theage of 24/7 sports coverage.Originally Posted by CP1708
Originally Posted by UCLAMIKE
Originally Posted by CP1708
And Stein reports the Blazers offered Odom a 5/40 contract........yeah? How's that? Convince Stern to get rid of the salary cap? They have no money to offer. Stupid idiot.
the offer could of come before they signed miller
and Stein and Bucher only reported the wade meeting odom because wade said it on twitter just like everyone else reported it off of that
LO's agent said he never even spoke to the Blazers.
If they did offer and yet another guy took less money to stay away from there, then great for me, but I doubt it.
And really? These guys have a job to report off twitter? Then I guess you and I are reporters too, because we can read something and then "report" it right?
They are REPORTERS, they are suppossed to know what they are talking about and speak on it, if they didn't know for an absoulte I need to read NikeTalk's rules. that Wade and Riles was meeting, then they shouldn't say @#$%. They're bums, stop defending them
Originally Posted by koolbarbone
What's wrong with reporting something off an athlete's twitter? As long as the twitter account is confirmed it's as good as an actual quote, provided that the reporter points out that his source was a tweet. If it's inaccurate, so be it, athletes and front office people lie all the time in interviews. Hopefully the reporter will dig deeper and confirm the information from the tweet with someone else but that's not always an option in the age of 24/7 sports coverage.Originally Posted by CP1708
Originally Posted by UCLAMIKE
Originally Posted by CP1708
And Stein reports the Blazers offered Odom a 5/40 contract........yeah? How's that? Convince Stern to get rid of the salary cap? They have no money to offer. Stupid idiot.
the offer could of come before they signed miller
and Stein and Bucher only reported the wade meeting odom because wade said it on twitter just like everyone else reported it off of that
LO's agent said he never even spoke to the Blazers.
If they did offer and yet another guy took less money to stay away from there, then great for me, but I doubt it.
And really? These guys have a job to report off twitter? Then I guess you and I are reporters too, because we can read something and then "report" it right?
They are REPORTERS, they are suppossed to know what they are talking about and speak on it, if they didn't know for an absoulte I need to read NikeTalk's rules. that Wade and Riles was meeting, then they shouldn't say @#$%. They're bums, stop defending them
I agree it's bad reporting if the journalist doesn't report the proper information off the tweet, but, generally speaking, I don't seeanything wrong with citing something off twitter.Originally Posted by CP1708
Originally Posted by koolbarbone
What's wrong with reporting something off an athlete's twitter? As long as the twitter account is confirmed it's as good as an actual quote, provided that the reporter points out that his source was a tweet. If it's inaccurate, so be it, athletes and front office people lie all the time in interviews. Hopefully the reporter will dig deeper and confirm the information from the tweet with someone else but that's not always an option in the age of 24/7 sports coverage.Originally Posted by CP1708
Originally Posted by UCLAMIKE
Originally Posted by CP1708
And Stein reports the Blazers offered Odom a 5/40 contract........yeah? How's that? Convince Stern to get rid of the salary cap? They have no money to offer. Stupid idiot.
the offer could of come before they signed miller
and Stein and Bucher only reported the wade meeting odom because wade said it on twitter just like everyone else reported it off of that
LO's agent said he never even spoke to the Blazers.
If they did offer and yet another guy took less money to stay away from there, then great for me, but I doubt it.
And really? These guys have a job to report off twitter? Then I guess you and I are reporters too, because we can read something and then "report" it right?
They are REPORTERS, they are suppossed to know what they are talking about and speak on it, if they didn't know for an absoulte I need to read NikeTalk's rules. that Wade and Riles was meeting, then they shouldn't say @#$%. They're bums, stop defending them
DWade twitter never said, "Pat Riley and I are flying out to LA to talk to Lamar Odom"
He begged and begged thru twitter, sure, but Wade never said Riley was flyin anywhere. That is bad reporting