- Jul 10, 2013
- 4,412
- 2,001
Yeah me too, sorry if it came out like that.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
One thing ive noticed is that dudes in here and the fila thread have crazy knowledge on retros
Thats because most are older and actually lived through all the og releases of popular retros.
Nike and jordan brand their consumers are mostly young and impressionable hypebeast and resellers
I like it too, I always felt that the Question deserved a Pump from the get go, since it was a signature for a top tier player at that time, but again, Reebok were moving away form the Pump, which was a massive mistake IMO, that led to them going down eventually. Now the pricing is crazy, they are so out of touch of the market situation, all Attaq's are made with amazing quality and they still go on sale, what do they expect to happen with the Question, I saw it yesterday on kickdeals for like $122 and is still too much IMO.@NobleKane
You don't like the Pump Question?
Sad face...I like it, especially the new CW that just dropped. I do NOT however, like the price point. More than a Shaq Attaq...which hits discounts anyway makes no sense.
I believe those Shrouds got them DMX tech which is light as well. Unless they changed it which I doubt.^Haha, beat me to it.........$110 for the OG team bank colors. Digging the red joints. And Reebok is wildin' with the "inflation over time" thought process for a sneaker with zero tech.
oic thanks for the clarification....well at least them have some sort of technology i guess for being lite for ball...
Nope they never had a DMX of any kind, only 3D Ultralite, check the EastBay scan on the previous page.
damn i wanted to use these Shrouds for ball....I guess it won't help if its indoor basketball; however maybe outdoor ball then...
Due to the lack of outsole, kicks with 3D Ultralite were very slippery and had a lot of traction issues, so the tech was never truly adopted, the only benefit was the weight.
Dope pick up man. Can't go wrong with that classic.
I just copped these and man i can wait to wear these. I got these at finishline for $89 on sale. Dee Brown Reebok Pump Omni Lite. Memories!
As much as i hate to buy stuff from FL, i had to use up my gift and rewards cards.
Most of the writers are very young, we have team members that are 13-14 years old, only myself and another person are considered an "old" dudes so yeah...Yeah I don't like that price point either for the Shrouds. The Ultralite sole without reinforcement is like that white pencil eraser rubber from grade school. So soft and pliable. Definitely not for outdoor use. Reebok should have coated it lightly with carbon rubber at least. Oh well, the sole is comfortable for casual wear. I'll cop at $60 or less. The only reasons I can think of for the price point is that they must be paying Kemp to stay on board. They could be putting the price point high to make some profit when it hits discounts, since they know it's a trend with their consumers. As for Reebok going with the cheap Ultra lite instead of sticking with other tech. I think the Pump was way overused early on. The tech for comfort and performance should have been focused on more.
On the topic of these young heads. No disrespect to your peeps @trentbg over at collective kicks but that recent article of "How I became more of a Sneakerheads after I stopped collecting". That article made me [emoji]128514[/emoji][emoji]128514[/emoji] because I thought the writer was older. The first kick that made him interested was the KD IV galaxy when he was in high school. SAY WHAT? LOL