- 10,719
- 43
- Joined
- Feb 12, 2008
wouldn't that look worse for the officers though? to put cuffs on him after the fact...Originally Posted by 22 Deuces 22
Originally Posted by rsdplaya
i don't think he was ever cuffed maybe...they had him zipped, which idk anything about this stuff, but is basically the same thing?Originally Posted by Dirtylicious
that makes no sense though...if he's zipped....there is really no need to cuff himOriginally Posted by 22 Deuces 22
Originally Posted by rsdplaya
has it been confirmed that grant was handcuffed?
Like I said before, if you watch the video, dude's hands are cuffed via zip-ties. You can just tell by the way his arms are positioned the whole time. Then after the cop shoots him, about 10 seconds later the other cop flips him over, while the shooting cop cuts the zip-tie. This is at about 1:38, that's when his arms come loose. Well this is what me and my boy concluded.
so they unzipped him after that to possibly make it look as though they never had him in control...pure speculation here...
Naw dude, I honestly think that they cut the zip-tie in order to put actual handcuffs on the dude (yeah, after he was shot). I come to this conclusion because I've read that he was handcuffed after the shooting.
So basically they had his arms locked via zip-tie, they shot him, cut the zip-tie, then handcuffed him.
rsdplaya, when I say zip-tie, I am referring to one of these:
it just doesn't make sense you know what i'm sayin?