MarvelSux
formerly brucewayne
- 2,215
- 1,241
- Joined
- Jul 19, 2012
^ thats a lie
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
The other dude Scott something was the thief not that Eric wouldn't but he started off as a shield agent that just took some Ant Man equipment Shield took from Pym.Wow that's cool. I was kinda thinking before the announcement that if Pym was in A2 he'd create Ultron and then die in the end and not Coulson die but really die.Plus I'm not even sure it's been confirmed that the Ant Man in the Ant Man movie is going to be Hank Pym. Since in the comics there's been 3 different guys to take up the name.
I believe Wright have been saying Hank Pym and then Scott Lang becomes the AntMan in the end. I remember him talking about the two teaming up as well.
Wright's way is cool too and probably keeps Pym around to be Giant Man or Yellow Jacket or Goliath l
Thought they would say that Pym was a scientist back during WW2 and built the tech then. He dies or goes missing, it's lost and Eric O'Grady finds it and decides to be a thief blah blah blah becomes a good guy. I can see Wright doing that.
Wolverine Origins, I have no idea where it falls since nothing in there makes sense. I think it is suppose to be before X1 but there are too many inconsistency.
The Wolverine (one coming out this week) is supposed to be after X3.
i thought it was during first class time period considering the cameo of him in there in the bar but guess since logan has no memory they can have the story in any year
One else like te Incredible Hulk more then Avengers hulk? Avengers one looked more real, but Incredible was a beast
Marvel Studios President of Production Kevin Feige forwarded the following exclusively to HitFix:
"We have made the decision to not bring Ed Norton back to portray the title role of Bruce Banner in the Avengers. Our decision is definitely not one based on monetary factors, but instead rooted in the need for an actor who embodies the creativity and collaborative spirit of our other talented cast members. The Avengers demands players who thrive working as part of an ensemble, as evidenced by Robert, Chris H, Chris E, Sam, Scarlett, and all of our talented casts. We are looking to announce a name actor who fulfills these requirements, and is passionate about the iconic role in the coming weeks."
Brian Swardstrom of WME responds with the following:
"This offensive statement from Kevin Feige at Marvel is a purposefully misleading, inappropriate attempt to paint our client in a negative light. Here are the facts: two months ago, Kevin called me and said he wanted Edward to reprise the role of Bruce Banner in The Avengers. He told me it would be his fantasy to bring Edward on stage with the rest of the cast at ComiCon and make it the event of the convention. When I said that Edward was definitely open to this idea, Kevin was very excited and we agreed that Edward should meet with Joss Whedon to discuss the project. Edward and Joss had a very good meeting (confirmed by Feige to me) at which Edward said he was enthusiastic at the prospect of being a part of the ensemble cast. Marvel subsequently made him a financial offer to be in the film and both sides started negotiating in good faith. This past Wednesday, after several weeks of civil, uncontentious discussions, but before we had come to terms on a deal, a representative from Marvel called to say they had decided to go in another direction with the part. This seemed to us to be a financial decision but, whatever the case, it is completely their prerogative, and we accepted their decision with no hard feelings.
We know a lot of fans have voiced their public disappointment with this result, but this is no excuse for Feige's mean spirited, accusatory comments. Counter to what Kevin implies here, Edward was looking forward to the opportunity to work with Joss and the other actors in the Avengers cast, many of whom are personal friends of his. Feige's statement is unprofessional, disingenuous and clearly defamatory. Mr. Norton talent, tireless work ethic and professional integrity deserve more respect, and so do Marvel's fans.
Did ILM have any involvement in the first two versions?
I believe it was money too. Weren't there articles not that long ago talking about renegotiations with Hemsworth, Evans, and them not getting fairly compensated for these ridiculously high grossing films? I think I even read in this thread that they could recast everyone but RDJ. (Not that I believed that part.)
Do people even read Hulk for Bruce Banner? I don't really care as I just wanna see Hulk tear **** up but people seem to really wanna see more Edward Norton.