3
39478
Guest
Originally Posted by DCAllAmerican
his face...is just too much
NFL :ESPN's Top 25 players this decade
- Thread in 'Sports & Training' Thread starter Started by ben roethlisberger,
- Start date
his face...is just too much
- 6,870
- 2,795
- Joined
- Sep 28, 2002
How do they taste? Salty huh?
Anyways I already stated some facts, I could def go on and on but the fact is no person ever played the position like Vick did with THAT much success. Dude hadleague defenses SCARED during his era. It was bannanas... But people will always hate.
- 3,692
- 1,275
- Joined
- Mar 22, 2006
^He barely played in the league.
Sure he had a good run and then he +@%$%+ up. He would have been on the list if he wasn't an idiot.
- 6,870
- 2,795
- Joined
- Sep 28, 2002
Originally Posted by Gregory House
^He barely played in the league.Sure he had a good run and then he +@%$%+ up. He would have been on the list if he wasn't an idiot.
Yea 7 years is def. BARELY
- 37,287
- 19,666
- Joined
- Nov 17, 2004
Yes.
- 6,597
- 10
- Joined
- Jan 13, 2001
Originally Posted by Gregory House
^He barely played in the league.Sure he had a good run and then he +@%$%+ up. He would have been on the list if he wasn't an idiot.
no - he wouldn't. Why are people confusing the fact that Vick wasn't a winner to begin with?
Dude has a lifetime 75 QB rating... the only thing that set him apart from a 2nd string QB were his legs, and even that would've barely kept him off mostof the elite team's benches.
- 9,264
- 58
- Joined
- Jun 30, 2003
you shouldnt have even responded to this .... NT be on some other stuff sometimes
- 8,766
- 12
- Joined
- Dec 19, 2007
[color= rgb(255, 255, 0)]that list seriously needs to be rearranged[/color]
- 3,938
- 11
- Joined
- Jul 22, 2007
Man you know damn well Vick isn't a Top 25 player this decade.Originally Posted by Jetpacunlimited
- 6,870
- 2,795
- Joined
- Sep 28, 2002
Originally Posted by Craftsy21
Originally Posted by Gregory House
^He barely played in the league.Sure he had a good run and then he +@%$%+ up. He would have been on the list if he wasn't an idiot.
no - he wouldn't. Why are people confusing the fact that Vick wasn't a winner to begin with?
Dude has a lifetime 75 QB rating... the only thing that set him apart from a 2nd string QB were his legs, and even that would've barely kept him off most of the elite team's benches.
Now we know who watched football and who didn't. After this statement your argument is null and your are ignored. Don't bother responding.
Originally Posted by Jetpacunlimited
Originally Posted by Craftsy21
Originally Posted by Gregory House
^He barely played in the league.Sure he had a good run and then he +@%$%+ up. He would have been on the list if he wasn't an idiot.
no - he wouldn't. Why are people confusing the fact that Vick wasn't a winner to begin with?
Dude has a lifetime 75 QB rating... the only thing that set him apart from a 2nd string QB were his legs, and even that would've barely kept him off most of the elite team's benches.
Now we know who watched football and who didn't. After this statement your argument is null and your are ignored. Don't bother responding.
Irony
- 115
- 10
- Joined
- Oct 24, 2001
hahaha at the thought of Vick on that list.
- 7,846
- 11
- Joined
- Jun 29, 2008
Roethlisberger shouldn't be on that list. Average QB but the rings def. helped.
- 640
- 10
- Joined
- Jan 9, 2007
Shaun Alexander
No Love for The Edge woww
No Love for The Edge woww
- 6,870
- 2,795
- Joined
- Sep 28, 2002
Originally Posted by CP1708
Originally Posted by Jetpacunlimited
Originally Posted by Craftsy21
Originally Posted by Gregory House
^He barely played in the league.Sure he had a good run and then he +@%$%+ up. He would have been on the list if he wasn't an idiot.
no - he wouldn't. Why are people confusing the fact that Vick wasn't a winner to begin with?
Dude has a lifetime 75 QB rating... the only thing that set him apart from a 2nd string QB were his legs, and even that would've barely kept him off most of the elite team's benches.
Now we know who watched football and who didn't. After this statement your argument is null and your are ignored. Don't bother responding.
Irony
As such it is, yall can hate the man all you want but football 2001-2007 wasn't the same when Vick was around. Sorry sir.
hahaha at the thought of Vick on that list.
Says the guy with Tony Romo as his avy. Say.. How manyplayoff games has Romo won?
- 3,938
- 11
- Joined
- Jul 22, 2007
Says the guy with Tony Romo as his avy. Say.. How many playoff games has Romo won?
You know damn well that isn't relevant at all unless the guy thinks that Romo should be on this list (which I really hope he doesn't thinkthat).
- 31,964
- 1,056
- Joined
- Jul 23, 2007
uh huh
DOWNTOWN43
no, because we actually watch football.
Peterson, after 2 seasons, is one of the best runners i have ever seen.
Lets address some fun points,
is it safe to say AD is running behind the best OL in the game right now? I say yes
How many times have you seen him have to make guys miss behind the LOS ? I havent seen many if any
Every run he makes he doesnt see bodies til the next level... truuu
is it a coincident Chester Taylor avg's 5.4 yards/carry behind that same line 2 yrs ago when he got carries (beat his highest ypc by about 1.5 yards )?I dunno yall tell me
there's no doubt Adrian Peterson has special God Given ability and crazy talent, but he has ALOT of help from that OLine
and not even touching on his HUGE fumbling problem.
- 43,528
- 8,416
- Joined
- Apr 24, 2005
I'm mad you're ad-libbing your own post.
- 31,964
- 1,056
- Joined
- Jul 23, 2007
- 6,597
- 10
- Joined
- Jan 13, 2001
Originally Posted by Jetpacunlimited
Originally Posted by Craftsy21
Originally Posted by Gregory House
^He barely played in the league.Sure he had a good run and then he +@%$%+ up. He would have been on the list if he wasn't an idiot.
no - he wouldn't. Why are people confusing the fact that Vick wasn't a winner to begin with?
Dude has a lifetime 75 QB rating... the only thing that set him apart from a 2nd string QB were his legs, and even that would've barely kept him off most of the elite team's benches.
Now we know who watched football and who didn't. After this statement your argument is null and your are ignored. Don't bother responding.
- 11,980
- 18
- Joined
- Feb 21, 2005
McNabb should have been there
- 37,287
- 19,666
- Joined
- Nov 17, 2004
- 21,365
- 812
- Joined
- Nov 20, 2003
jason taylorrrrr, yessir! JT = HOF.
Originally Posted by Chester McFloppy
Lets address some fun points,
is it safe to say AD is running behind the best OL in the game right now? I say yes
How many times have you seen him have to make guys miss behind the LOS ? I havent seen many if any
Every run he makes he doesnt see bodies til the next level... truuu
is it a coincident Chester Taylor avg's 5.4 yards/carry behind that same line 2 yrs ago when he got carries (beat his highest ypc by about 1.5 yards )? I dunno yall tell me
there's no doubt Adrian Peterson has special God Given ability and crazy talent, but he has ALOT of help from that OLine
and not even touching on his HUGE fumbling problem.
Similar threads
