raider5
Supporter
- 16,481
- 21,411
- Joined
- Aug 25, 2012
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Sucks to think about because we like the players and, in many cases, who they present to be as people but if I put on my crass businessman hat I put on when I play Monopoly, I'd do exactly the same.Because getting their most valuable years being the rookie contract is the most important part. I understand the emotional/human argument but it’s a business.
Top 10 RBs (statistically) from last year (included 11 since one was a QB):
1. Josh Jacobs (Raiders)
2. Derrick Henry (Titans)
3. Nick Chubb (Browns)
4. Saquan Barkley (Giants)
5. Miles Sanders (Eagles)
6. Dalvin Cook (Vikings)
7. Justin Fields (Bears) *
8. Christian McAffrey (49ers)
9. Travis Etienne (Jaguars)
10. Aaron Jones (Packers)
11. Jamaal Williams (Lions)
Of those teams 5 made the playoffs (none of the top 3 did). Such an important position to offense
Top 10 QBs (statistically)
1. Patrick Mahomes (Chiefs)
2. Justin Herbert (Chargers)
3. Tom Brady (Buccaneers)
4. Kirk Cousins (Vikings)
5. Joe Burrow (Bengals)
6. Jared Goff (Lions)
7. Josh Allen (Bills)
8. Geno Smith (Seahawks)
9. Trevor Lawrence (Jaguars)
10. Jalen Hurts (Eagles)
Of the top 10, 8 of them made the playoffs.
So let me ask y’all this, of those 8 playoff teams listed above, if you took their starting RBs away would they still make the playoffs?
If you had their backups in at QB would they still make the playoffs? Just asking since apparently backup QBs aren’t as important as a starting RB per certain NTers
The last 10+ years of SB participants have had
Todd Gurley, Fournette, Sony Michel, Joe Mixon, Miles Sanders, Devonta Freeman, Edwards-Helaire, Legerette Blount, Jonathan Stewart, Marshawn Lynch, Rashad Mendenhall, Ray Rice, Reggie Bush… and more.
Those guys were either 1000 yard rushers that super bowl run/season… or at least 8 of those guys were first round picks
So, they’re GOOD enough to help your team get to the super bowl but that’s where it stops
All them RBs you mentioned, would they still make it there without them vs without their QBs? I’ll wait
You forgot to mention that:
Herbert had Ekeler
Hurts had Miles Sanders
Lawrence had Etienne
Cousins had Dalvin Cook
Mahomes had Pacheco/Edwards/McKinnon
Goff had jamaal Williams
Despite what you said, those guys relied heavily on the run or threat there of.
Don’t care how you slice it, teams still need the running game. Whether singular or by committee
Shanahan literally had to move Deebo to RB because they were injured and stagnant at the position lol
Shanahan literally had to move Deebo to RB because they were injured and stagnant at the position lol
do you think saying a team had success playing a wide receiver at running back helps your argument
So you’re saying a WR can play RB
Thank you for proving my point
You know deebo was converted to WR at South Carolina? He plaid RB in high school
Tyreek Hill was RB in college as well
Who’s comparing RB pay or value to QBs? Everyone knows the QB position is most important.
No one is saying pay these guys QB money. Some of us are saying just pay them
The unfortunate thing is that the run block efficiency matters more than the actual running back. It’s hardly like that list was full of NFL superstars.The last 10+ years of SB participants have had
Todd Gurley, Fournette, Sony Michel, Joe Mixon, Miles Sanders, Devonta Freeman, Edwards-Helaire, Legerette Blount, Jonathan Stewart, Marshawn Lynch, Rashad Mendenhall, Ray Rice, Reggie Bush… and more.
Those guys were either 1000 yard rushers that super bowl run/season… or at least 8 of those guys were first round picks
So, they’re GOOD enough to help your team get to the super bowl but that’s where it stops