- 20,969
- 26,734
- Joined
- May 10, 2013
how many games did Vegas have the Giants winning last season?
NFL OFF-SEASON THREAD 2022-23: FanDuel getting everybody hemmed up. ESPN went Kamikaze. We in that dead zone of the year y’all.
- Thread in 'Sports & Training' Thread starter Started by aNYone,
- Start date
- Status
- 20,969
- 26,734
- Joined
- May 10, 2013
Those deals better be heavily frontloaded because on the backend those won’t be pretty.Yea that’s just terrible business. Especially with Saquon’s injury history.
dacomeup
Supporter
- 25,724
- 35,739
- Joined
- Jan 20, 2006
Better basically have an out after year 2. At that point, you’re probably giving them 2/30gtd
- 27,649
- 39,754
- Joined
- Mar 14, 2010
Yea that’s just terrible business
Gave Sterling Shepard 4-40 million and he’s equally injured
- 73,066
- 98,922
- Joined
- Dec 27, 2012
Are we not going to talk about Barkley only having two good seasons in the NFL? And one since 2018?
- 27,649
- 39,754
- Joined
- Mar 14, 2010
My dawg can’t even get Sterling Shepherd money 
- 23,607
- 18,764
- Joined
- Jan 22, 2010
So far I’ve heard they should get paid more because of marketability and now because they take so many hits
Do y’all really think GMs would ever take those things into consideration? Serious question
Do y’all really think GMs would ever take those things into consideration? Serious question
- 27,649
- 39,754
- Joined
- Mar 14, 2010
GM positions have more turnover than the very same position we’re discussing. A lot them aren’t credible. There are only like 8-10 good GMs in the NFL at any given time.
Dudes be fired after 2 years
dacomeup
Supporter
- 25,724
- 35,739
- Joined
- Jan 20, 2006
That GM is no longer employed because he was dog ****Gave Sterling Shepard 4-40 million and he’s equally injured
.
- 23,607
- 18,764
- Joined
- Jan 22, 2010
GMs, owners, investors, drug dealers who fund owners, whoever you want to bring into it that pays players. Do you think they look at a player and say “Wow he’s really marketable and takes a lot of hits, we should pay him more”?
aNYone
Supporter
- 28,558
- 33,435
- Joined
- Dec 31, 2012
Deebo smart as hell.
Cause he’s a RB playing WR out there but got himself WR money
All RBs should do this. Abandon the position.
Problem is, as a child coming up,everyone wants to play running back since you always get the ball.
Derrick Henry coulda been playing DE and made double the money.
Could y’all imagine someone with Saquon dimensions playing WR?
Make it 7 on 7 at this point.
Cause he’s a RB playing WR out there but got himself WR money
All RBs should do this. Abandon the position.
Problem is, as a child coming up,everyone wants to play running back since you always get the ball.
Derrick Henry coulda been playing DE and made double the money.
Could y’all imagine someone with Saquon dimensions playing WR?
Make it 7 on 7 at this point.
air spider 777
Supporter
- 5,748
- 5,056
- Joined
- Jul 5, 2005
I'd offer Saquan 3/36. If he doesnt want that, then see ya. IMO.
D
Deleted member 248173
Guest
How many good seasons has Daniel Jones had? How many full seasons has he played?
One good season he played every game that season.
2/30 is fair for your best player. Giants aren’t making the playoffs last year without Saquon.
It’s a contact sport, players get hurt. You can’t make that excuse when you just gave a QB with an injury history 41 a year.
Now your HC is gonna be asked daily about Saquon, Daniel is finally gonna have to deal with that “NY media” people always talk about. Every show today has started with, Daniel should have took less and got too much and now his best player might not be there. Ex players have come out said players look at management funny when they stiff their best players. Overall, horrible look for this team.
- 73,066
- 98,922
- Joined
- Dec 27, 2012
I would have tried to move off Jones years ago, let alone get to a point where you're facing a decision on an extension.
Saying "Well we gave Jones x amount of money so now we have to do the same for Saquon" is just compounding a mistake.
aNYone
Supporter
- 28,558
- 33,435
- Joined
- Dec 31, 2012
Nah.
The players left the tag in last CBA so imma use it.
I’d tag him until kingdom come.
The players left the tag in last CBA so imma use it.
I’d tag him until kingdom come.
- 20,969
- 26,734
- Joined
- May 10, 2013
The QB market and the RB market are not remotely the same at this point. We can’t keep comparing what a QB and what RB get now.
Last edited:
D
Deleted member 248173
Guest
Overpaying him when he had very little interest from other teams was another mistake. Let’s say you gave Daniel 30 a year and no one matched it. You can easily pay Saquon and a couple more players.
aNYone
Supporter
- 28,558
- 33,435
- Joined
- Dec 31, 2012
I wouldn’t have re-signed Jones but I understand the reasoning. If he’s even average or slightly above average, you have to re-sign him especially if you can get him on a friendly-ish deal given the current market.
I think they’re resigning of Jones shows more faith in Daboll’s play calling than anything.
- 25,325
- 45,201
- Joined
- Jan 30, 2010
If you got a J Tucker type kicker, definitely should pay them more than a RB…It’s a more stable long term investment
- 25,325
- 45,201
- Joined
- Jan 30, 2010
The only way Running Backs will get paid more is if they agree to have their contracts be short term…Re negotiate every 2-3 years, if they legit they keep making more bread till they like 30 and if they not or hurt teams can move on without much dead money going in the future
This will squeeze out the mediocre and back up runners tho, they’ll get nothing but 1 year deals
This will squeeze out the mediocre and back up runners tho, they’ll get nothing but 1 year deals
- 3,101
- 2,151
- Joined
- Nov 12, 2002
This debate is going nowhere in here.
The NFL is a passing league. Full stop. The fact of the matter is the majority of rbs are interchangeable and widely available. So their value is stagnant, if not decreasing. However there are outliers that deserve pay bumps and I believe Saquon to be one of them. What goes against him is that the dude can’t stay healthy. So I agree with
frshstunna
that the ultimate solution is gonna be shorter incentive laden contracts for RBs for the foreseeable future.
The NFL is a passing league. Full stop. The fact of the matter is the majority of rbs are interchangeable and widely available. So their value is stagnant, if not decreasing. However there are outliers that deserve pay bumps and I believe Saquon to be one of them. What goes against him is that the dude can’t stay healthy. So I agree with
frshstunna
that the ultimate solution is gonna be shorter incentive laden contracts for RBs for the foreseeable future.
DeadsetAce
Supporter
- 106,227
- 52,200
- Joined
- May 31, 2004
Not to mention that QB contracts keep skyrocketing while the cap doesn’t keep up proportionally
TipsyMcStagga
formerly kod843
- 12,174
- 14,447
- Joined
- Aug 1, 2011
- 20,969
- 26,734
- Joined
- May 10, 2013
Nicer uni than what they currently have
- 58,153
- 29,589
- Joined
- Feb 12, 2005
Love it, love it, love it.
Wonder if they ever do the classic road whites. Those my favorite too.
- Status
