Aquamanjay_
formerly jaylaw15
- 8,180
- 9,259
- Joined
- Dec 18, 2014
Now that I have these, and have seen many pictures of the OGs, the heel tab on the 99s as well as the paint color and speckle density looks the worst (weird) to me
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
I think people need to stop comparing present shoes with pass shoes, they're not going to 100% identical. I'm very appreciative that I managed to cop these beauties.
I think people need to stop comparing present shoes with pass shoes, they're not going to 100% identical. I'm very appreciative that I managed to cop these beauties.
Why wouldn't anyone compare the shoes? It's a sneaker discussion. People have opinions and this is a forum.. lol. Not trying to be some smart but your comment doesn't really make much sense.
The 99 was far from identical, and for a lot of people better. All I care is that there's an NA on the back, but it's always fun to nitpick.Makes plenty of sense to me. We haven't gotten an identical retro in at least 10 years.
A lot of these comments about how they aren't OG are from people that weren't even born when the OGs dropped
The 99 was far from identical, and for a lot of people better. All I care is that there's an NA on the back, but it's always fun to nitpick.Makes plenty of sense to me. We haven't gotten an identical retro in at least 10 years.
A lot of these comments about how they aren't OG are from people that weren't even born when the OGs dropped
Nike retros have basically always been different. Usually due to destroyed molds (tsk tsk foams) or good design changes as seen in the AJ3 back in 94.I wasn't talking about the 99s. I was speaking in terms of retros from Nikes as a whole bruh.
Nike retros have basically always been different. Usually due to destroyed molds (tsk tsk foams) or good design changes as seen in the AJ3 back in 94.I wasn't talking about the 99s. I was speaking in terms of retros from Nikes as a whole bruh.
It's not been "10 years" that's all.I
Know
It's not been "10 years" that's all.I
Know
Anyways, back to praising WC4.
WC4 continues to be a neck breaker on the streets week after week it's just amazing to me. Young children, seniors, business suits, high school kids, even babies in strollers, no joke they would all turn and have a stare at these shoes.
I think people need to stop comparing present shoes with pass shoes, they're not going to 100% identical. I'm very appreciative that I managed to cop these beauties.
Nike retros have basically always been different. Usually due to destroyed molds (tsk tsk foams) or good design changes as seen in the AJ3 back in 94.
I think people need to stop comparing present shoes with pass shoes, they're not going to 100% identical. I'm very appreciative that I managed to cop these beauties.
Now....now....don't start introducing anything remotely logical in the forum, you may scare people outta here
Nike retros have basically always been different. Usually due to destroyed molds (tsk tsk foams) or good design changes as seen in the AJ3 back in 94.I wasn't talking about the 99s. I was speaking in terms of retros from Nikes as a whole bruh.
I
Know
These are a little more snug compared to the 2012. Not by much though.How'd you guys size on these in reference to the WC 2012s?
Smdh, TF man? Your second wear?My second wear is coming up Friday. I'll confirm then if the comfortability I felt initially is there.
I'm 99% positive it still is [emoji]128077[/emoji][emoji]127998[/emoji]
nonsense. I've sold lots of stuff on eBay with a no return policy and I have 100% feedback. My pics and descriptions are thorough. If you want it, buy it. If not, don't. Ain't got time for return nonsense and ain't nobody ever wanted to.The no return policy doesn't hold up to be honest.