- 33,427
- 39,199
Nike Air Jordan Retro 3 OG “Fire Red” 2022
- Thread in 'Jordan Brand' Thread starter Started by Jordanbball,
- Start date
- 329
- 1,146
These REPs getting super close! Be careful!
- 1,089
- 2,813
Yeah they got the price wrong too
- 9,863
- 34,334
- 13,435
- 11,948
oof, these Wish.com taobao 3s looking significantly better than 2013 FR 3s:These REPs getting super close! Be careful!
I honestly do admire Jordan Brand’s commitment to diversity/inclusion by hiring blind people to design retros though.
da r entertainment
Supporter
- 9,926
- 3,802
Release day is going to bring virtual bloodshed.
Well at least we got about 2 more months now. This worked out great!!
- 895
- 739
Wonder why they didnt make the cement pattern more darker like the OG Fire Reds?...oh wait i know...that will be done on the next Fire Red 3's retros..lol $$$$$$$
- 14,896
- 20,194
At this point idek what ya talkin bout in regards to the elephant print, there's really no pleasing ya 
- 285
- 340
I hope you're being sarcastic. The EP is very close to the OGs.
- 13,435
- 11,948
Lol remember when the 2015 Bord 7s and Aqua 8s came out? People had grown accustomed to the previous butchered retros JB had been pumping out of those shoes that some didn’t like the designs of the glitter on the Aquas and the darker midsole on the Bords that were actually closer in design to the OG releases
- 14,896
- 20,194
It happens every time, and JB has no one to blame but themselves
- 1,277
- 838
Every retro has a design flaw in one way or another. For some, there is a point where it can be excepted and for others not so much. If you purchased 2018 Black Cements, I can’t see why these would be any different.
I skipped the early 2010s 3 retros except for true blues and white cements. I didn’t have those colorways so I excepted them. Now I wouldn’t, but still have them and wear them. Either you except or move on, but I can understand the frustration that this company brings with there one step forward, two steps back foolishness.
I skipped the early 2010s 3 retros except for true blues and white cements. I didn’t have those colorways so I excepted them. Now I wouldn’t, but still have them and wear them. Either you except or move on, but I can understand the frustration that this company brings with there one step forward, two steps back foolishness.
- 13,227
- 14,701
For the record - these look phenomenal lol
Not sure why everyone is going on a rant on this page but if it’s at me just know it’s misinformed.
Only thing I stated was a half serious comment about “getting used to” the lighter shade of EP on these because the only real life handling of this colorway I have is from my 07 pair. Which I loved. So seeing them with the accurate EP is new to my eyes and is taking some adjusting. (In a good way)
Obviously I’m excited these resemble the OG’s more accurately than the 07 pair.
Not sure why everyone is going on a rant on this page but if it’s at me just know it’s misinformed.
Only thing I stated was a half serious comment about “getting used to” the lighter shade of EP on these because the only real life handling of this colorway I have is from my 07 pair. Which I loved. So seeing them with the accurate EP is new to my eyes and is taking some adjusting. (In a good way)
Obviously I’m excited these resemble the OG’s more accurately than the 07 pair.
- 4,319
- 7,451
It's a shame that every retro ever has been slightly off. Nike is just a bunch of greedy trolls.
- 13,435
- 11,948
While I agree with you, there is no excuse for mass produced fakes to be of higher quality than the retail products.
This is nothing new, or just related to Jordan retros-hell, look at how poor quality the retail Panda Dunks are.
- 914
- 1,723
There's no excuse for jB to be at least 96-98% accurate to OGs. There's pairs floating around of OGs that aim sire if they wanted collectors would sell/donate them so they can get the measurements right.
I'm also not buying their bs story of we lost the molds and blueprints. A multimillion dollar company lost their designs for their most profitable shoe for their most profitable? As stone cold would say, THATS BS!
When you have repmakers doing a better job with materials, shape, and QC than you're doing, and have customizers BUILD a more accurate 85 mold than you have (mercurymfg) than they really don't give a damn and only care about the money.
From a company that is a global juggernaut and sets the market, they should still be focused on producing the best quality product out and not just a brand name. Although that's what it is and will continue to be, that wasn't the og Nike vision when they were getting shoes from that Japanese tiger company.
That's just unacceptable from a consumer POV.
I'm also not buying their bs story of we lost the molds and blueprints. A multimillion dollar company lost their designs for their most profitable shoe for their most profitable? As stone cold would say, THATS BS!
When you have repmakers doing a better job with materials, shape, and QC than you're doing, and have customizers BUILD a more accurate 85 mold than you have (mercurymfg) than they really don't give a damn and only care about the money.
From a company that is a global juggernaut and sets the market, they should still be focused on producing the best quality product out and not just a brand name. Although that's what it is and will continue to be, that wasn't the og Nike vision when they were getting shoes from that Japanese tiger company.
That's just unacceptable from a consumer POV.
- 33,427
- 39,199
This right here baby
- 3,632
- 8,155
Except the consumers have spoken with their wallets and they do accept it.
It’s sad but it shouldn’t be surprising.
- 13,227
- 14,701
They can replicate them. They won’t. They don’t need to.
Most heads buy close resemblance or “they got all this right and threw faux aged leather on it.. but I’m in cause it’s *insert colorway* “
Just facts tbh
- 13,435
- 11,948
I mean they have improved their products when enough people complained and they were trying to increase prices like they did with the 2015 “remastered” program rollout. I don’t think it’s a coincidence that Nike is scared of New Balance falling into so much favor with Zoomers and are in the middle of a big lawsuit with StockX over reselling (since many fakes are getting insanely good now). They need to protect their brand value and have to market better/improved products over time, which includes retros. It’s annoying to all of us because this is completely self-imposed by Nike/JB since the OG products from the 1980s and 1990s are almost always far better quality than the retros they sell today and us sneaker enthusiasts know that this is completely intentional, which is maddening lolThey can replicate them. They won’t. They don’t need to.
Most heads buy close resemblance or “they got all this right and threw faux aged leather on it.. but I’m in cause it’s *insert colorway* “
Just facts tbh
- 914
- 1,723
I understand it's just as much as our faults for buying but we love the player and we have memories and nostalgia tied to the shoes. Plus they look stylish. That still doesn't excuse them. If you want to be the best like they say that put out the best product. Not QC issued pairs like we've been getting. And I understand things change over time, and business and shareholders and making a profit and yadda yadda, but if you gonna raise prices due to "inflation" or "catching up with the resell market" and you want to charge a premium price, better come with a premium product. And that's all I gotta say about that.
A case of don't forget where you came from and who made you. Also don't bite the hand that feeds you.
I was gonna type that but I was driving to get some chicken baby!
A case of don't forget where you came from and who made you. Also don't bite the hand that feeds you.
I was gonna type that but I was driving to get some chicken baby!
- 33,427
- 39,199
What kind of chicken?I understand it's just as much as our faults for buying but we love the player and we have memories and nostalgia tied to the shoes. Plus they look stylish. That still doesn't excuse them. If you want to be the best like they say that put out the best product. Not QC issued pairs like we've been getting. And I understand things change over time, and business and shareholders and making a profit and yadda yadda, but if you gonna raise prices due to "inflation" or "catching up with the resell market" and you want to charge a premium price, better come with a premium product. And that's all I gotta say about that.
A case of don't forget where you came from and who made you. Also don't bite the hand that feeds you.
I was gonna type that but I was driving to get some chicken baby!
rbk93
Supporter
- 14,158
- 13,420
- 10,625
- 23,557
Well that is more than disturbing.
- 914
- 1,723
It was some chicken express tenders and fries. Them fries and renders were hitting.
